Are Unions inherently Evil?

Unions are a way of slowing down natural selection. These (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bag peasants trying to "band together" to oppose the edicts of actual intelligent people (the management) who are the brains of the operation, do nothing except benefit themselves at the expense of future generations of mankind who would undoubtedly be a lot better off if they had sacrificed themselves.

 

Source?

 

My source is something that you liberals don't have: common sense.

Business owners are the smartest people. Their management staff is the second smartest. The workers are DUMBER THAN HELL. They're bottom feeders, and serve nothing as tools for smart people to use for profits, and RIGHTFULLY SO.

The history of human evolution has dictated that the smartest get their DNA to remain in the species, and people such as your union workers, do not. Period. Why should that change ALL OF A SUDDEN now?

We can't simply reverse this process and return to being low intellect apes!! That's not moral, nor possible. Stop acting like it is, liberals!!

 

If management was as smart as you maintain, they wouldn't have unions in the first place. Obviously they were so smart, they ended up having unions organize their shops because the working conditions were so good. Or they were so smart they hired so-called lazy employees which made it easy for unions to organize. Yep, management is definitely a smart bunch. Business owners are even smarter for hiring managers who hired these so-called "lazy" employees. Your definitley in the groove pal.

 

Eureka. I've found out why left-erals hate success: because they're envious of the intelligence, charisma, and noble status that people with money have.

 

All unions encourage murder?

Source?

 

Do you own a business?

 

Dude, stop trolling and use actual logic against conservatives instead of trying to come up with the dumbest chariacature that you can.

 

Couple of comments that unions are "un-American". American unions are very American in fact.

 

I might exaggerate things, but I do actually think that most poor people are impulsive slugs, based on personal experience. Have you ever read the relationships, given by real data, between IQ and wealth?

 

Yes, but IQ is not the only measure of intelligence. Qualifying as a college professor isn't a goal for a large section of the population so they only know what they need to know.

 

Do you own a business?

 

Noble status? LOL. Intelligence, charisma? I know many rich people without anything of this.

And the left people, at least me, want to have a good life, live well, being able to live comfortably and well also I have the bad habit to want to have three meals for day. You know.

And your ignorance about the world is incredible. Do you mean that people like the King of Spain is rich thanks to his intelligence? or Rodrigo Rato? or George Bush?

 

I guess if you count making DMT and selling it, lol..

But no, I don't. Not *yet*.

 

Isn't that illegal?

 

That is very true, IQ doesn't *accurately* measure "intellect". But true intelligence is not something that can really be easily defined by anyone, and I doubt that anyone has ever accurately even defined true intelligence..so we have to rely on tests of certain mental strengths, not because that predicts anything with any fine degree of probability, or because they define "intelligence", but because they're the best we got, so to speak.

But some IQ tests are designed a lot better than others.

 

Ahhh. Not me!

But it depends. It's not illegal in..Africa. hmm.

 

I mean, by all measures I would consider you to be a 'small business owner' then, lol. But I'm not sure your fellow conservatives would...

 

If a "conservative" thinks I shouldn't be allowed to do that with voluntary customers and for myself for recreation or for any purpose, then they're not conservatives, they're Republicans.

 

Its very obvious that in your relatively short time in here, you cannot be taken seriously. Your not intereted in debate; rather trolling is what you appear to enjoy best.

 

Hey man, I agree with you. You are engaged in possibly the freest market that exists right now. I'm just saying that you will probably have to deal with crap from the bottom-feeding 'conservatives' on this site now.

 

that doesn't happen in my state and we are a right to work state. When employers suck, we get a better job somewhere else. Generally, the employers want loyalty and dependence; so, they end up doing a pretty good job of keeping employees by adding benefits and raises and decent pay for the level of work being done without unions having a whole lot of 'say so'.

We generally get paid less than people working tge same jobs in non-right to work states, but our cost of living is much lower.

Hell, our NWGEs (non working government employees, I.e. welfare recipients) can get away with basically having no job because of the low cost of living.

My only point is that your hyperbole, Kilgram, is false. There are plenty of places that don't let unions control industry (thereby driving up the costs of property, goods, and services), and they can still perform financially well without child slavery or mandatory 12 hour work days. Supply and demand doesn't end with purchases alone. It also works with employment.

 

No unions are not inherently evil. So long as those who run them do the will of the workers instead of as is the case in Wisconsin, ignoring what the workers want and demand, to instead carry out the will of the leftist socialists and their big one world government cronies.

 

Crony capitalism is the precursor to socialism..and then you know how that goes. The precursor to socialism is not a "worker's revolution".

 

So freaking WHAT?

It ain't easy digging coal out of a poorly-ventilated hole in the ground, and you are five times more likely to die a slow and horrendous death if there is no union telling the boss "fix the ventilating system or no coal comes out of the ground."