Zimmerman granted $1 million bond

Just pointing out Zim's contradictions [lies]. Zim said he was not following Trayvon at this point. Said he was looking for an address to give to dispatch.

A question to those who say it was Zim crying for help. Zim said Trayvon covered his mouth and nose so he couldn't breath or cry for help. So which is it?

 

GZ didn't need to be part of a NW to report a suspicious person to the police, to stay on the phone with police, to keep an eye on the person, or to ask the person what he was up to. There are no laws against any of those actions, they are not provoking anything, and GZ was well within his constitutional rights. However, TM sucker-punching him and beating him on the ground "MMA_style" was certainly unlawful and a deadly force assault. GZ had every right to shoot him, when he continued to beat him.

_

 

Zimmerman's DNA on Trayvon's hoodie.

 

Really? Do you have link that shows this and makes the connection to it proving GZ attacked first?

_

 

LOL! You don't have to say anything about Crump to show you are one of his parrots....

 

He covered his mouth for the entire confrontation???

His covering of the mouth leads me to believe that TM was trying to silence the screams for assistance. Hardly, the act of a person trying to get away from GZ.

_

 

Well Lioness, if you haven't read Judge Lesters ruling on the last bond then you don't know much about this case.

 

LOL! Sounds like you posted phony info. Here is a written transcript of the call:

What's up with that?

 

Certainly, and in fact, why have a trial at all. Just detain him and call him guilty already, right?

 

HAHAHA! Why do Crump's Chumps have no concept of time and sequence of events.

 

There minds were affected well prior, its just showing now that's all.

 

The problem is, you don't want a fair trial. You and your supporters already have him convicted. If we were to treat criminal cases in this manner, we might as well be living in a dictatorship.

 

I have made this argument several times to some of my less than unbiased friends and they just look at me without an answer. Where would he hide at this point that we can't find him? In fact, the best way of escape for him is to cut a tree, fashion it into a canoe and make way off the coast of Florida. That would be the only way he would go un-noticed, and even then, someone would question the missing tree around his gaurded compound.

 

Good evasive answer and PA.
Want to deal with facts. Want to claim you deal only with facts. Suggest you do so and do so with out evading questions put to you about assumptions, not facts that you post.

I get most of my info from
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/Zimmerman_Discovery.pdf
Not from Crump, not from Omara, and certainly not from the provenliar Zimmerman. They have their own jobs / agenda's in what they have to say.
I do take what the Judge says seriously unlike Zimmerman.

 

Everyone is a lying SOB. Clearly, someone not being completely up front about their financial standing in an enviornment of public prosecution and judicial politicalization means Zimmerman is guilty of murder.

 

But it seems you haven't read the Judge's ruling on Zimmerman's second bond. Try catching up.

...and why do you post a lie like this:

LOL! Sounds like you posted phony info. Here is a written transcript of the call:

What's up with that?

 

No, I didn't say Trayvon covered Zimmerman's mouth so he couldn't yell for help. Zimmerman, the proven liar said Trayvon did.
Imagine this though;
Trayvon had no DNA,blood, saliva or snot of Zimmerman's on his hands. This after punching Zimmerman in the nose, supposedly [so says Zimmerman] covering his mouth after giving him a bloody nose.
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/Zimmerman_Discovery.pdf
Read the evidence, not the words of a proven liar Zimmerman.

 

I posted a link to the video with that post. This was on the video loooong after Zimmerman said that to the dispatch. Long after he left his car. After Zimmerman walked the path all the way to the other street and back to the 'T' with the investigators. At that time Zimmerman was no longer even on the phone with dispatch. After dispatch told Zimmerman "we don't need you to do that.
At the time Zimmerman said he had stopped following him. Used the excuse he was all the way to the opposing street to get an address for them.

Did you view the video? Do you know understand the timeline?

 

Of course. But why post something deceptive like that...

 

How thorough was the DNA test done as far as collecting samples? Did the police cover Martin's hands while it was raining? How long was the body in the rain? Answer these questions and your claim may have merit, until then it proves nothing.

 

Deceptive..probably...it is the words from Zimmerman's mouth. Did you listen to the tape?

" yes because I'm in the area."

Those are words straight from Zimmerman's mouth, not mine. When he was doing the re-enactment walk through with the investigators.

 

So what? You say you get your "facts" from the discovery released but then post a YouTube video? LOL! Hilarious, Some "facts"....

 

Rain, water, does not wash away blood evidence. Bleach does. Rain could wash away the appearance of blood, but not the entire DNA of it. That takes cleaner or more so bleach. Do you think someone bleached Trayvon's hands before his autopsy?

http://www.enotes.com/disturbed-evidence-reference/disturbed-evidence
[, and invisible traces nearly always remain. These can be visualized using a luminol spray,

Trayvon's arms and hands were found by police under his body when they first arrived [of course Zimmerman says he held Trayvon's hands away from his body AFTER shooting him]. Suppose he tucked his arms and hands back under his body before police arrived.

The whole point is that Zimmerman is a proven liar. Want to prove or dis-prove a point, using Zimmerman's words to do it don't work. Evidence, photo's, forensic's, other people's testimony...perhaps. What Zimmerman says, the next day he says the opposite. Has been proven in a court of law, by his own differing statements, to be a liar.

If someone is innocent, why would they have to lie?

 

Still haven't watched the video? Yet you argue against it?

It IS Zimmerman speaking on that video geezzzz.

 

But again you don't know how well the swabs were done or how thorough any evidence like that was looked for. To make these claims is ridiculous.

Anyway, I have stated many times I don't put much stock in what anyone with "skin in the game" says. They have motive to lie, that includes Dee as well.