GOP Lawmaker Gets a Tiny Fine for Having Sex With Patients

I don't agree with you.

 

What a smear job. CREW files a complaint, NOT the alleged victims base on stuff in his divorce file from 10+ years ago. Geez if that's the case then Obama should have an ethics complaint filed against him because he admitted to illegal drug use in his own book. This is a really comical attempt to smear on the part of liberals, is the best ya got?

 

No parallel. Monica went to DC planning on schtuping the POTUS.

 

Oh thats right. He was just a president. Guess that lets him off the hook.

 

I bet if he was a Republican it would be. You dudes are real funny.

 

Your sounding more and more like Ubama...when he doesn't agree with something then it must be right.

 

Now days thats all they got left.

 

When I was an auto mechanic I had sex with several of the women whose cars I worked on. Hell, I married two of them. Nothing wrong with being friends with your customers.

 

Yeah, it figures a Rightie would find being an auto mechanic having sex with his customers equivalent to being a doctor having sex with his patients!

I mean, who cares that the doctor has taken an OATH to not engage in such behavior, and that there are LAWS against such behavior.

And the doctor has the power to give his patient drugs to disable their will or even their knowledge of his attentions.

Yeah, no problemo for the Right! Hot nookie is always fair game...

 

Phony outrage.

Carry on.

 

Fair enough.

 

$ 250 is less than it would have cost him if he had contracted hookers.

The USA legal and political system is as corrupts as any in the world.

 

Was it consensual? If it was...I'm not some political Puritan that wants to jail people or fine them for consensual activities.

Get on wit ya bad selves Dems and Pubs...

 

The worst thing isn't that he did this, but the fact that the same electorate that elected him touting such "high moral values" and such despicable outrage to lib'rals will no doubt elect this jag bag for multiple more terms of office. I'm sure he'll apologize all Mark Sanford like and the conservative voting bloc in Tennessee (is there any other bloc in Tennessee) will no doubt re-elect him because "he ain't libral". It's funny just how much they'll accept from their own party, not realizing that a schmuck is a schmuck and most people that run for office in "red" states run as conservatives no matter their values or ideologies. The money only comes if you get elected.

So, maybe I should consider running in a red state. How hard would it be to state that I'm pro life, anti gay marriage, extra patriotic and that I hate the gubmint. See, I'm exactly like you guys, and as long as my name as an R next to it come election time, I'll every year, no matter what I do while in office. Accountability aschmountability.

 

Indeed. Its out in the open now and the voters will decide.
Incidentally, many of those who vote for guys like this are also full of hypocrisy. Don't believe it, do your research. Out of wedlock pregnancies, common law marriages/cohabitation etc are not really aligned with the conservative/biblical facade.
So I suspect that many of the voters may have also looked the other way, as long as the man gave good lip service.

 

Do you believe that Democrats are actually different? Oh my.

Obama ran on being different than Bush. He was going to close Gitmo, prosecute torturers, end government spying on Americans, keep our troops home, etc.

What a babe in the woods you are if you believe that Democrats are different.

 

I know. Let the voters decide if he's still trust worthy enough. But there's got to be a better way to making sure people are educated about voting.

 

The difference between the two is that Obama inherited all of that crapola and was almost immediately strapped down by the most worthless congress in history (yes, both sides). Bush created all of that mess. When Obama actually initiates the shear mass of stupid programs and policy that Bush did, let me know. But I don't think it would be possible in just 3 short years. If it were Bush again, I might believe it possible. Look, Obama had ideals, and I think if possible he'd still want to stop many of those things. But just because it a was stupid problem to start those problems doesn't mean that anyone wouldn't make it even worse by ending them. Gitmo is the perfect example. In all reality, it probably should never have formed the way it did with the purpose it did. But once there, what exactly do you do with a bunch of possible terrorists that you've been torturing for a decade? Set them free in your own country? Ask an ally to take them on? Send them to an enemy that doesn't want them? I mean, you are asking for more terrorists. Now, I can assure you that the type of torture and the rounding up of Gitmo candidates has slowed in his tenure, he probably doesn't have a proper exit plan that doesn't further endanger our world with now ANGRIER and more justified terrorists in their hate for our nation. This is the problem with ever letting a moron like Bush in office. Everything they touch turns to crap and it makes everything anyone tries to do about that crap smell of it too. You can't just wash stuff that bad off because you want to. I'll give Obama a hard look for his naivety, but I'll never hold it against him for having the ideology to want it to end.

 

Amazingly you can't see they are the same thing

poor behavior is only relavent if the law says it's wrong?

 

You seem to forget,the last 2 years Bush was in office,it was a democrat run congress,so it wasn't ALL Bush,and if you think Bush got where he is by being a 'moron',then I have to question YOUR intelligence

Fact is,Obama is the same s*** with a pretty package and half the country fell for it...again.

 

Nothing in this story indicated that the sex was anything but consensual. No drugs or other such influence was involved. We are talking about some false outrage about a man having consensual sex with a couple of women. Would you be as outraged if this doctor was given a tiny fine for a consensual homosexual relationship?

One other thing about your post - no where in the hippocratic oath does it say "I swear not to have sex with a patient". No doctor takes an oath not to have sex with patients.

 

Did you know that most people are not so immature that they consider consensual sex to be "sleazy"?

How old are you? Like 8 or 9 years old or something?

 

Have you ever wondered if that is even possible? I know, we could possibly start an entire thread on that theory alone.
It is my opinion that people hear, see and interpret whatever they wish. At least most, and not just in this case.
How many people actually research, compare, look at issues, instead of catching some spoon fed words on TV/radio?

 

No,, the homo Dr.s get a pass just like the homo dems do. Libs object to normal consensual sex between Dr. and patient but are fine with abnormal homo sex between boy scouts and their troop leaders.

There may be laws in some states about Dr.s having sex with their customers and my boss had rules about having sex with or even talking to the girls in the office but in the end he didn't have the balls to fire me.