Why is Adolf Hilter a reason to end the white race?

People who want to preserve the "White Race" should realize that most of the DNA that people consider to be indicators of that "race" are recessive in nature. That means there is a strong genetic handicap against trying to do any such thing. Now if you wanted to preserve the "Chinese Race", a lot of their genes are dominant ones. The Mongols at the time of Ghenghis Khan were mixed Caucasian-Oriental (I believe Ghenghis had red hair) but too many Chinese war brides modified their geneset over time until now they are basically Oriental (I use Oriental because the scientists keep changing the scientific word).

 

Your 'economy' has been flushed down the crapper by successive white governments. Stable it is emphatically not!

 

In this multicult supremacy, the only way Whites will find peace is to surrender. We have more natural power than our enemies and the traitors who have brought us to this crisis. If we stand up for ourselves, we can crush them like grapes. It's time to quit whining and start making wine.

 

Well, there's one item there I would agree with. But really, black women and brown women and purple women and... even paisley women are pretty schweet, too.

 

The fact that you want it is not reason enough to give you one. Sorry.

There are plenty of other reasons besides those. But the best reason is this: You are not entitled to a state. You are not entitled to have a place where you can exclude other people simply because you want to.

The US belongs to all of us collectively. There is no way to give you a state without taking it away from us first, and we do not want to surrender it. So unless you can take it by force, you are SoL.

 

That sounds very interesting. red haired genghis? Got any sources for all this?

 

Here's one:

http://launchistory.blogspot.ca/2012/05/red-haired-emporer.html

 

Go move to Iceland.

 

These savages captured a lot of slaves from human races, so that's probably how Genghis Khan got his red hair. The Mongols were the worst of the worst, making Hitler look like Mother Teresa. Maybe Genghis's genes made him able to organize them, but he still led a movement of mass murderers killing just for the thrill of it. Maybe his conflicting genes is what made him insane.

 

I'm a big fan of Central Asian/Steppe Nomad history and that interpretation is just not true. Most of the peoples of the nomads were mixed white/oriental, with the mix varying the further West or East you went. It wasn't until the Chinese had regular interaction with those nomads that the oriental genes became predominant, and that was as a result of the success of the Mongol conquests. Prior to Temujin, the Mongols were a bunch of warring tribes who seldom captured anybody except members of the other tribes.

I would also disagree that Ghenghis was insane. Utterly ruthless and determined to conquer, but in fact his attitude was much like that of a White Nationalist. The Mongols were the true people of the world and everyone else was subhuman so it didn't matter that much what the Mongols did to them.

He even carried out a successful experiment in mass brainwashing - he killed all the adults and older kids of the tribe of his archenemies and then raised them under a new name (the Tartars), teaching them that the new Mongol way was the only proper and Gods-given way. The young boys grew up to be the most loyal and fanatical followers of Ghenghis' successors - much like many of the Hitler Youth.

 

The Mongols, Huns, and Turks were a different species entirely, much like the Neanderthals in Europe. But you can have your PC junk food from academentia, I'd rather feast on reality and common sense about it.

 

That is a very odd statement. How about a little scientific fact to back that up, PB? The Neanderthals had very different skulls and denser bone structure, which would be blindingly obvious if Mongols, Huns and Turks were that different. For that matter, some Huns actually ended up in Southern Switzerland (Anniviers valley) and they don't appear to be a different species (Neanderthals apparently had trouble breeding with Homo Sapiens, judging by the small amounts of Neanderthal DNA).

The Goths started out as steppe nomads around the Ukraine/Crimea area and they were about as Caucasian as you can get, so there is irrefutable evidence that some steppe nomads were Caucasian. Since no-one drew a dividing line in the grass between Caucasian and Oriental populations, the only question is to what extent the two gene groups mixed. The scientific evidence suggests they mixed a lot.

 

By a "white state" do you mean you'd take over the property of others? That's what people usually mean when they advocate the state. If so then I'm against it. Period.

If you merely mean a voluntary community, or your own property, then go right ahead

 

If other ruling class can degenerate, why can't academia? Acadummies are jealous, bitter, escapist misfits, so I'd put them all on Ignore.

The Great Wall of China is proof that the Chinese were surrounded by predatory gangs. These subspecies were also driven into the jungles of Southeast Asia and the mountains of Tibet. It is a fact that pioneers try to settle in the best land, not in No Man's Land. Why did they choose such inhospitable places? Why don't your PC self-appointed experts answer that? If it were allowed, the most likely answer would be that they were fugitives from justice.

 

Nomadism isn't a sign of inferiority. Its just the kind of lifestyle people adopted when they found themselves living on plains.

 

Absolutely not.

The government denies us a white state.

Yes.

 

The nomads in the North of China were actually hard to deal with militarily (hence the Great Wall) but out West the relationship was more complex: in some eras those to the West attacked China while in others they were attacked by China and in at least a couple of eras they lived at peace with each other and the Tibetans and Hsiung tended to copy China.

In the South of China the history was one of on-again, off-again expansion by the Chinese at the expense of the native people, some of whom were subsumed into the Chinese population (the Yaka, for instance) and others whose remnants were driven into the jungles of Southeast Asia (the Shan, for instance). Over time, the population of China definitely shifted its centre of density from Northern China to Southern China, because the better land and weather was concentrated in the South.

Just because people hadn't developed a higher level of civilization doesn't make them subhuman or a subspecies. There are quite a few cases of cultures developing a high level of civilization but not having the military strength to survive, including the Angor Wat culture of Southeast Asia or the unfortunate Incas in the Western portion of South America, so simply being civilized isn't a measure of final success.

 

You can't tell the difference between a predatory attack by the Mongoloids and a pre-emptive self-defense invasion of the predators' territory by the Chinese. My personal experience with the Vietnamese made me a "racist." As for the Incas, I have no sympathy for people who don't develop their self-defense. Perhaps their easy conquest of all the other tribes made them soft.

In the movie Apocalypto, we shouldn't feel sorry for the jungle tribe that got butchered. They were negligent in self-defense. They should have had nightly patrols to warn people of an attack coming. The way the Mayas were practically wiped out when they went into the jungle after that one native showed that the jungle tribe could have made their village secure.

 

I'm not white but even I can see that this won't end until the American and European whites tell the Jews they've had it with the immigration bs. Israel is strict about immigration, they don't just let anyone in, yet Jews in white countries are constantly pushing for liberal immigration laws.

 

Anti-semites always leave a yellow stain. You bootlickers of rich parasites don't have the guts to stand up to those quislings for allowing this invasion for cheap labor and as part of trade deals to set up sweatshops in Third World ratholes. No, you sissy loyal peasants always obey your thieving Masters' command to blame the JEWS!! What pathetic cowards and traitors to your class you are! We will incinerate all your Dresdens until your slave genes all turn into fire and smoke.

 

So a fanatic Muslim nation that developed a shield against nuclear weapons and wiped out the USA and Western culture with nukes would be the good guys, because the Western powers would have been negligent in their self-defence? The only true measure of culture is how highly evolved your ability to kill the other guy is? That's a pretty twisted argument in my book.

 

You are the one not being logical. If you're too lazy to lock your car or too cheap to buy protection from auto theft, does that make the subhuman criminal who steals it a good guy?

 

According to your logic it would, PB, because I would be the bad guy for failing to protect myself adequately. Now how the Incas were supposed to protect themselves against steel and gunpowder weapons when they had zero knowledge of either until the Spanish appeared on their doorstep ... They probably had lots of warriors armored in hardened wood and flint-edged weapons.