Signature Theory, signature belief. I have a signature theory and a signature belief. The maximum, observable length of time is ONE SECOND only. Do you have one? What is yours history, we do alter it more than once.
The maximum length of time observable is one second only. The ability to observe and catch the next and subsequent "maximum one second time frame" depends on the indivual's understanding and capability to harness them continuesly, thoughtfuly and vigorously. He who fails to do this shall have his memory suffer and as a result maybe a victim of this alzheimers disease. If one is to believe in infinity, he has then to challenge everything, including Capitalism and ALbert Enstein's E = mc².
Why one second? A second is fairly arbitrary. Is there something special about a second that makes it more observable than say two seconds? Also, what do you mean by "observable"? Do you mean like watching the second hand on a clock?
Not only "fairly arbitrary" - entirely arbitrary. We can lay any sized grid we desire upon space and time, using any non-zero distance (extent in space) and non-zero duration (extent in time) as a base unit for each. BUT - we would then have to modify accordingly any and all other physical units that depend on them for their own standard definitions. We can choose any definitions for any physical units that we please, as long as we maintain the same mutual relationship between them all that we actually measure in our experimental observations. It's the actual relative proportional relationship between measurable physical properties that are not arbitrary and that we are therefor obligated to maintain if we desire to construct useful mathematical representations of physical reality.
ok, so, put yourself in a test: in any conversation with your friends, lets us see how much of it ( length ) could you observe? in any movie or tv you watch, let us see how much of it (length ) could you observe? in any speech you hear, let us see how much of it (length ) could you observe? let us say you had a one hour conversation with your friend, could you ever recall the whole length of that conversation? I am telling you that it is always this "maximum observable one second time frame" that we can only observe, due to its length and speed. capitalism is not replaceable.
123v567890 How long did it take you to notice the v...... was it four seconds....or did you note it in less than one second once you reached it?
Sorry - that makes absolutely no sense as a response to my post or in any physics context. If you want to try to establish a more absolute system of measurement units for spatial extent and duration in time, I would advise you to look into Planck length and its dependent Planck time. The second is the basis for the MKS and CGS (and others) in the SI system of units, however units of time are defined in terms of observable (measurable), regularly oscillatory PHYSICAL phenomena - mechanical, electric or atomic clocks, etc. The second is defined as "9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom" - see Second. Unfortunately if you and I are moving uniformly relative to one another, we will not agree on each others' rate of clock ticks - see time dilation and photon clock for why this is so. Consider two observers with their own "photon clock", each clock consisting of two identical, perfectly reflecting, facing mirrors in a perfect vacuum, and each with a photon bouncing with perfect absorption and re-emission between the mirrors - an idealized notion, but useful. The two observers are moving relative to one another at perpendicular velocity v. Since the velocity of light (velocity of the photons in their own and the other person's clocks) as measured by each observer would be the same (equal to c in both cases) owing to the constancy of the speed of light from Special Relativity, the other observer's clock will appear to tick after traveling a distance of 2D while their own clock's photon will tick when a distance of 2L has been traversed. That means that the other person's clock must appear to tick slower than their own. In fact this has been verified by using to relatively moving atomic clocks. They do not remain synchronized as a result. How each of the two observer "sees" their own photon clock How each observer sees the other person's photon clock as the move by at velocity v. And "capitalism is not replaceable" (???), in the context of ...., oh, well never mind.
I guess you would need to define within the context of the conversation your definition of "observable" and "observation" Else we really cannot evaluate your theory one way or another.
capitalism cannot be replaced by socialism nor communism. socialism and communism can only challenge capitalism. there is no single solution to poverty. poverty is the pillar that keeps this stupid species alive.
frankly speaking you are just giving the definition of a "second". what I have been saying is that the ...the "maximum observable length of time is one second" only, and this manner is in a "frame". so in theory, what the brain sees in any event that takes place is always in a "maximum observable one second time frame". (regardless of how scientist has defined this one second). if ever you could notice, that whenever President Obama speaks before his crowd, he pauses, that is because this "maximum observable one second time frame" applies to his speaking engagement.
If you are really convinced of this then so be it - it's your tangent. It's quite obvious that if you can conclude that the photon clock Gedankenexperiment somehow demonstrates "the definition of a second" as opposed to say, the mechanism of time dilation and the relativity of simultaneity based on the constancy of the speed of light, then what more could I ever possibly say? [BTW - that's a rhetorical question.]
I believe that in any future, someone will in any way join me in this observation of mine. Maximum observable one second time frame. It is up to individual to have the capacity and capability to connect the series (max. observable one second time frame) of it without losing the accuracy of the contents of the actual events as they eventuate. Man's general physical movement is based on this max.observable one second time frame. The moment he extends his movement outside this max. observable one second time frame, he freezes out. One could have noticed that the size of informations that one processes affects his general physical movement. Maybe one day, this maximum observable one second time frame could benefit science. I know that this is so wild, because out of 7 billion indiduals, I am alone to this first of its kind observation.
