The Grand Jury In Michael Brown Shooting Case Is Mostly White

You claimed Williams grabbed the officers gun and was shot for it.

 

Unlike some i dont post under multiple screen names. I am not JP5.

Now do you a citation for an autopsy where they had access the Browns clothes or not?

 

So far as we know only the results of one autopsy was released and that was the one done by the hired gun for the Brown family and he reluctantly admitted that it looks like Brown was shot only from the front. He would not have had access to the clothing nor to a corpse before it was washed clean.

 

Yep. I guess instead of admitting that he wants to pretend i said something and move the goal posts.

 

(Shrug) So far -- with only two interesting exceptions -- this is shaping up along the same lines that the leftwingers engaged in regarding the Trayvon Martin event. Make outrageous claims based on hysterical hatred of guns and on kneejerk playing of their tattered old race cards, and then one by one their outrageous statements of opinions and fantasy-based suppositions that are presented as irrefutable Mainstream Media generated 'facts' get methodically debunked one after the other after the other, and so then they double down on both the hysteria and shrieks of "Racism!"

The only meaningful difference is that this time their innocent little angel was actual caught on video being a practicing thug and the stolen item was found on his body after the fact AND for once Barack Obama actually refrained from opening his mouth and shoving his racist foot ankle deep down his own throat. So far there hasn't been one of those glorious "If I had a son he would look like . . . " moments or indeed a moment resulting in the historical-first political damage control Beer Summit. Um . . . so far, that is.

 

AHHHH so he should go to jail because of the REST of the country and he was a coward for patrolling those areas even in the dark of night taking the calls of an armed man seen running or a burglar in a house laying his life on the line for the people of that community and then having the gaul to not let Brown beat the crap out of him probably causing serious bodily injury. Gotcah.....

 

Well since their names are usually chosen for either voter rolls, and we know the black citizens in that area don't vote, or from drivers license and according to you guys blacks don't have drivers license, you know the no voter ID thing, and you must have a clean criminal record and we know blacks disproportionately engage in and thus get caught committing crimes, why would you expect more blacks serving on grand juries? If blacks will register to vote, get a proper ID and then not engage in crime perhaps more will be selected for grand juries.............where am I going wrong here?

 

His assault on the officer in the car as alleged and witnessed certainly contributed it to it.

 

If he was a real cop he could have subdued Brown without firing a gun.

""Last year, in total, British police officers actually fired their weapons three times. The number of people fatally shot was zero. In 2012 the figure was just one. Even after adjusting for the smaller size of Britain's population, British citizens are around 100 times less likely to be shot by a police officer than Americans. Between 2010 and 2014 the police force of one small American city, Albuquerque in New Mexico, shot and killed 23 civilians; seven times more than the number of Brits killed by all of England and Wales's 43 forces during the same period.

The explanation for this gap is simple. In Britain, guns are rare. Only specialist firearms officers carry them; and criminals rarely have access to them. The last time a British police officer was killed by a firearm on duty was in 2012, in a brutal case in Manchester. The annual number of murders by shooting is typically less than 50."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025426367

 

I'm not going to wade through the trash otherwise known as Huffington P

so i will address your title alone

the grand jury is mostly white

hey, guess what... So is the country.

Everything is racism, isn't it?

how utterly sophomoric... juvenile ..
not to mention Tiresome..


____

 

If you are a regular black person your life is worth about 2 cents. With a 80 percent white jury it is going trouble for the prosecutor even if the facts are on his side. A white cop killed oscar grant and alI he just said it was an accident. They gave give less than a year with of video of the whole event.

 

So......since blacks represent about 12% of the nation, give or take.....that would mean that on NO JURY should the numbers of blacks be more than about 2 out of the 12. Is that the point you're trying to make here?

 

Awesome. Please continue the Anti-Law and Order platform the Dems have blundered onto. It's WONDERFUL.

Make sure you continue to try to make "race" the Big Issue for November.

 

I just saw something interesting on the news about the riots. A reporter was interviewing a few young black men about the looting and such. Of course the young men all justified the looting on the grounds that they had no job and that there is very little opportunity in their neighborhood.

Then they went on to say that if the businesses which were destroyed during the looting don't rebuild and return, " there will be he'll to pay" in Ferguson. They complained that they need to travel miles and miles to find a Wal Mart where they can buy cheaper goods that they can afford.

It just dawned on me that the black leaders in these communities always oppose the building of a Wal Mart in black neighborhoods as they claim they add to the urban blight.

So, people complain about what they don't have, but oppose putting what they need and don't have in their community.

Then, why would a business want to rebuild or relocate to a neighborhood they know will be destroyed when the people become unhappy for whatever reason?

 

Hence why I asked for your evidence to this assault. So far we've heard lots of stories, but little in the way of evidence....well, other than the fact Williams died with six bullet holes in him.

 

No, all I saw was him saying the black jurors won't get to have things go there way.



.

 

Yeah, I know... this is just another race-baiting thread and should be considered trolling... but I have a question...

What exactly is a jury doing trying to "prove" anything ?

Are you so set on posting race-antagonism threads that you don't care that what you're saying makes no sense whatsoever ?



Lol... jury members won't be able to "prove" anything.... ffs


.

 

This grand jury was picked prior to this case coming up. A grand jury hears every case that comes up that term of court. If this jury returns a "No True Bill" the state can bring that case again with the next grand jury, if they want. In Missouri a grand jury is selected randomly from a master jury list. It only takes nine members to find a "true bill". It was once said, "You could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich." There's a pretty good chance that this case gets handed up for trial. If it doesn't, you can bet there is some information that we are not privy to at this time.

 

Because the Politics of Division and Victimhood are the ONLY CARDS LEFT in the LEFTIST's DECK, and they know it. They think they are going to make the midterms about "racism", the idiots.

 

White people have terrible history with racism, with the possibility of this case being race based it is a bad sign for the prosecutor.

 

He had graduated the academy was sworn in was wearing the badge, he was as much a real policeman as Brown was a real criminal. So Brown is within 30 feet of him rushing him at full speed with the intent to bowl him over doing more injury to him. What would a "real" policeman have done?

And when the UK has the same violent black culture we have here get back to me.

 

What do you call the contemporaneous account of events that was recorded on the cell phone call? What do you call the injuries sustained by the officer?

 

The prosecutor doesn't want a 'true bill' from this Grand Jury.........his police officer father was killed by a black man.......he knows who the 'Gentle Giant' really is........and what he was capable of doing.

 

Ok proggie, asking that a jury reflect the race of the defendant is borderline segregation.

And you can shove this "White establishment" rhetoric back up the plumbing it came from.

The vast majority of accomplishments in human history have come from, and will continue to come from, Whites.

That's why Whites hold most of the wealth, businesses, properties, lands, positions of authority, and recognitions of merit.

And yes other races are a close second but where do Blacks land?

Not just in last place, but so far in last place you would think somebody left out a few thousand years of history.

Blacks in America live better than all other Blacks have at any time period and in every measurable way, and they still slaughter each other in droves and spread epidemic levels of violence throughout every place they inhabit.

Real hard to get ahead as a people when your pop-culture idolizes feral thugs who, beat women, snort crack, rob gas stations, shoot cops, and sag their shorts a whole 2 feet under their buttocks.

So ya, we have a "White establishment" because Whites come out on top.

Deal with it.

 

LOL. People get a little drawn into surface issues.

The way I see it, people tend to have a corrosive look on Black people in general. Black tends to mean "guilty before proven innocent" to some people, and in some neighborhoods or places that is a definite way of life. We can go on about what should be or what could be, but no one really knows what's on the minds of these people.

Have a jury of all white people, you're going to come out with a biased verdict.

Have a jury of all black people, you're going to come out with a biased verdict.

Have a jury of about half and half and you're probably going to need some security in the deliberation room.

There's a chance that cooler heads will prevail and any of the jurors will look on the evidence dispassionately, but that seems to be the long shot. I'm sure people are not unfamiliar with racists juries in America. It certainly would not be fair to condemn peoples suspicions of racism or bias in the legal system as absurd. The condemnation would be absurd in and of itself.