WAR ON WOMEN… South Carolina Dem Gubernatorial Candidate Calls Nikki Haley a WHORE

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Wehrwolfen, Oct 26, 2014.

  1. Wehrwolfen

    Wehrwolfen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,350
    Likes Received:
    5,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    by Jim Hoft
    October 25, 2014


    War on Women—
    Don’t expect the far left feminist groups to condemn this.

    South Carolina Democratic gubernatorial candidate, State Senator Vincent Shaheen, called Republican Governor Nikki Haley a “whore” during a stump speech this week.
    vincent shaheen

    Then he starts chuckling about it.

    [video=youtube;tLwiKhGtcHg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLwiKhGtcHg[/video]​

    Breitbart reported:(http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...haleys-dem-opponent-escort-whore-out-the-door)


    While giving a get-out-the-vote speech at a Florence, South Carolina political event, Democrat gubernatorial candidate, State Senator Vincent Shaheen, told cheering fans of his opponent, sitting Republican governor Nikki Haley, “We are going to escort whore out the door.” He then seemed to correct himself by exchanging the word “whore” with “her” while sharing knowing smiles and laughs with the Democrat crowd.

    Stay classy, libs.


    (Excerpt)

    Read more:
    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...haleys-dem-opponent-escort-whore-out-the-door

    The War on Women, attacking gender and misogyny are the prerequisites for Democrat Progressive Liberal politicians at all times, yet they point the finger at Republicans. Oh, I forgot only Republican or conservative women deserve the acrimonious attacks.
     
  2. Papastox

    Papastox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    10,296
    Likes Received:
    2,731
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I read where he's 17 points behind. With that comment, he will be double that.
     
  3. Wehrwolfen

    Wehrwolfen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,350
    Likes Received:
    5,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Where's Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Pelosi, or Fluke on this sort of cacka coming from of all people a Democrat? Should she the epitome of the Woman's Movement be out there with her bumbershoot beating this goy's head? Oh, I forgot he is after all a Democrat, so that's okay.
     
  4. Daybreaker

    Daybreaker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    17,158
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Huh. I have to admit, before I watched the video I was thinking that you were just taking an opportunistic shot at a verbal typo, but when I watched it, it did look deliberate.

    That's lame.

    Also lame is the deliberate obtuseness that republicans have about their war on women. It's not about stupid political attacks on individual women. It's about deliberate policy that restricts the behavior of women, specifically, and punishes them for making choices you don't approve of. And no, contrary to what you might believe, that's not the purpose of government.
     
  5. Karma Mechanic

    Karma Mechanic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    48
    More ignorant ranting from the right.
    Here is the thing. There are Republicans who say horrible things about individual women and there are Democrats who do the same. Neither of these are considered a war on women.

    Now when you create policies or promote ideas that attack women's ability to advance themselves. Then that is an attack on women. When you decide that rape victims "shut that whole thing down" and promote that idiocy, that is a war on women. When you have a hearing in Congress on women's reproductive rights and invite no women that is a bit of a war on women.

    Now when Rush called Sandra Fluke a slut for simply wanting to speak her mind the right jumped all over themselves to defend him, many still continue to call her a slut on her twitter feed every chance they get.

    While the jerk in North Carolina should be shunned and ridiculed for what he said we don't see nearly the reaction of people supporting his sexist statement.

    So tell you what. Here is your chance right wingers. Condemn Rush here. Say when he called Sandra Fluke he was being sexist and a jerk. If you can't or won't then you can just shut up about this (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) because you are simply a hypocrite.
     
  6. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,711
    Likes Received:
    3,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She's definitely a corporate "whore" given her extreme support of corporations who exploit women in general.
     
  7. Sanskrit

    Sanskrit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    17,082
    Likes Received:
    6,711
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, not equivalent, particularly when the woman in question is RW. Democrats win that nastiness hands down no contest. The scorn heaped on Clinton victims is the most egregious example, was telling because there were so many of them and there was no other side to the story possible. The man was at least a sexual harrasser and at most a rapist. But, admittedly, like your lame Limbaugh example, that was in the past. What the left does to Sarah Palin literally weekly is utterly inexcusable, hypocritical, inconsistent, yet it goes on constantly. The fact that you have to pull up a 2.5 year old Limbaugh incident proves you are hot air on the claim above. Dems do it weekly to Palin and other women who dare to be RW.

    Spare us the tired, bogus feminist narrative. Women, as a matter of cultural, political, and legal fact, are an advantaged majority in this country in many ways. Tempt me and I will list them, or maybe not because it won't do a lick of good with your ilk.
     
  8. Tram Law

    Tram Law Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    9,582
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This serves to illustrate one of the big reasons why I have problems with maturity.

    I don't see any of it in that video.
     
  9. Papastox

    Papastox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    10,296
    Likes Received:
    2,731
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It boggles the mind, doesn't it? There is some disconnect with Democrats' brains. They make it a focal point of their party's beliefs that women should be respected and be treated equally-----YET they are the worst offenders of their own belief. Can they REALLY be that stupid.? I guess they are...they don't "get" that Condoleeza Rice, Sarah Palin, Bristol Palin, Nikki Haley, Michelle Bachman are all WOMEN. But the worst part is that Liberal women are nastier to women than men are. They are disgusting...
     
    Tram Law and (deleted member) like this.
  10. Papastox

    Papastox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    10,296
    Likes Received:
    2,731
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But the Democrats have made this one of their signature policies---not because they care about women,because Democrat MEN made the policies, but because they need women's votes. Democrat men are just as sexist as any other man, and are total and complete hypocrites for trying to pass themselves off as something different. THAT is the point. Stop smearing women of ANY political persuasion. You might be respected more instead of bring the party of nasty.
     
  11. Wehrwolfen

    Wehrwolfen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,350
    Likes Received:
    5,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Thank you. You were more eloquent in your description of the Progressive Democrats war on women. It all comes down to ideology. Republican women according to the Left can only be described in low terms of intelligence and bad social values. I seem to remember when they felt the same about black people too.
     
  12. Papastox

    Papastox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    10,296
    Likes Received:
    2,731
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, if you have the audacity to not tow the Liberal line and not kowtow to their irrational beliefs, then you are not considered to be their intellectual equal. To that I say "hallelujah!" because a box of rocks is smarter than they are and I am probably insulting the rocks.
     
  13. Wehrwolfen

    Wehrwolfen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,350
    Likes Received:
    5,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You are right both Left and Right have made errors in language, however, this was deliberate as anyone can plainly hear and see. I seem to remember in the past how Democrats took the GOP candidates for words that were said. As
    an example the 'Macaca' incident with George Allen. Then there's the incident in Palin family incident in September that the MSM has yet to stop reporting on, but Hunter Biden's problematic drug addiction is swept under the rug. This too will be hushed up and placed into the dark black memory hole.
     
  14. junius. fils

    junius. fils New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,270
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If this is true, and it seems to be, then Vincent Shaheen is an a$$hole.

    Was there anything else?
     
  15. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,231
    Likes Received:
    16,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only right we are looking to terminate is the right, which should not exist to begin with, to terminate the life of another human being without due process. What's really obtuse is that leftists appear to believe that the statement pay for your own damn birth control constitutes a war on women.
     
  16. junius. fils

    junius. fils New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,270
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The whole issue revolves around the question of is a fertilized egg a person. I say no. The alternate claim is, I believe, based on religion or, rather, one interpretation of one religion and is not even supported by the Bible. When a fertilized egg has grown to the point where, taking the wonders of modern medicine (and, given some of the preemies I've seen, wonders in an appropriate word) it is viable, that is one issue. If it is not viable, to include not being able to function as a person - not an animal, but a person - then that substantially alters the matter.

    The simple potential is not enough. Every day, I stick myself with a needle and test my blood sugar. Each blood cell contains the DNA which, POTENTIALLY, could become a human being. DNA can also be found in hair, but I don't see religious fanatics shooting barbers, bombing barber shops, or running picket lines around the local tonsorial emporium. When a woman's body spontaneously rejects a fertilized egg, people don't hold a funeral. The entire anti-abortion noise is a creation of that same religious right which opposes birth control and insists on forcing THEIR version of THEIR religion on others, and the GOP is playing them for suckers in order to get their votes. This is not to say that the repubs have not conducted their campaign brilliantly. They have succeeded in phrasing the debate so that every abortion is pictured as the destruction of a healthy, viable baby, and most people like babies (I have six grandkids). This is a conscious lie. An amorphous blob of substantially undifferentiated cells is not a person.

    Birth control is an issue with at least two facets. One is a woman's right to control her own sexuality, the local constipated religious types (usually men) notwithstanding. These types are usually against any sort of sex education except that conducted in the back seat of a Chevy. Suggest, rather than the pill that the male wrap that rascal or get clipped, and they object. The other facet deals with the many and varied non-pregnancy-related aspects of female health, which the puritans and other civic joy-killers are willing to destroy in order to further their agenda.

    So much for that subject. It's time for me to stick another needle - insulin this time. Growing old can be over-rated.
     
  17. Koosie

    Koosie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A slip of the tongue can hardly be considered a "war on women".
     
  18. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why not? The Left does that sort of thing all the time by equating one isolated incident as being the irrefutable nature or intention of all of the Right. So one can promote anything at all as being indicative of a War on (fill-in-the-blank). Then it's up to the citizens to decide for themselves. Politics is fun, yes?
     
  19. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,231
    Likes Received:
    16,915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you go to Narals web site you will find that the average abortion is performed at around ten weeks. By that time, if you'll check any modern fetal development chart, you'll discover that the only significant difference between a ten week fetus and a newborn is lung capacity. And some people do. It takes about 24 hours for it to cease to be an egg.
     

Share This Page