Feminism. The cancer of Western women.

There have been several frankly hate inspired and twisted philosophies that became a popular position at one time or another. Few have acted in the same corrosive, destructive and nefarious manner as the phenomenon that we call “feminism”.
Let’s be very clear from the outset what this philosophy wasn’t. It was not a good natured and ultimately well intentioned ideology. It was always an ideology with deeply hateful writers that breathed life into it, pick up any known feminist writing and that hate and misandry drips from every sentence.


But it didn’t end with merely hating men, all men had ever done, and all men had ever been. It was ultimately(and perhaps mostly) damaging to women themselves.

We can clearly see that is true a few decades on from when the first seeds were sown.
Contrary to what people may be taught today or told be feminists, the Western and Christian world has always very much respected and cherished the best of our women. If we were such an inherently female hating society, why would the virgin Mary hold such reverence for so many men, right across the Western World?


Feminism as an ideology set out to destroy the bond between men and women. It purposefully set out to turn one against the other.

There is nothing goodly or benign about an ideology that sets out to go against nature itself. Feminism not only wanted to alienate women from men, but it aspired to undermine marriage and having family. They sold ideas to women that they could just have lots of casual sex instead, without the responsibility, love or commitment.
Hey, they could even have that career as an executive something or other



They usually regret it of course. By the time they are 40 they have no kids, no husband, and less men even want to take them home for cheap empty sex. Their career no longer fulfils them and they are soon on the anti- depressants and drinking too much to blot out the reality of dying alone.

What else has it brought girls today? STI’s in abundance. I guess that’s sort of a gain. After all, if she gets one she may go infertile. This ensures she has yet more time to pursue that important career marketing cardboard boxes. There is certainly far more porn and nastier porn around than there was in the days when women were supposedly “oppressed by the patriarch”™. If you think your daughter falling in with the wrong crowd and ending up a porn “star” is giant leap for women hood, then hurrah for feminism.

Women have all these opportunities and chances to make a name for themselves in so many good ways these days, right? But what do we see? We see “(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) Riots”, we see a generation of stupid females that paint messages on their boobs and upload their attention seeking vid to U Tube, we have Femen and their degeneracy. We have a nation of women that are mixed up, highly neurotic, often lonely, and they are on prescription drugs and drink too often.

“They aren’t being oppressed by the patriarch though”…

 

You are aware "feminism" started with The Bible?

Sexism is quite rampant in the Torah, considering the Hebrews were once a very chauvinistic society when it was written. As a feminist, I find it my duty to site the following verses and remind fellow women of the sexist pig they are told to worship. I can not possibly list all of the injustices that the Torah mentions. Everything from the story of Lilith (who was booted out of Eden for having dominant sex with Adam) to how women are blamed for the fall from grace. I had to settle for merely presenting a sample list as of right now and I shall add more verses as I thumb threw the Pentateuch a second time. In the mean while, please feel free to utilize anything you see here.

Genesis 3:16 Says that all women must suffer great pains during child birth due to Eve eating the fruit of knowledge. (As if it is somehow just that humans should pay for their ancestor’s sins nor is a woman dying in labor some how befitting of a crime she did not commit.) The verse finishes of by saying a husband shall “rule” over his woman, stripping us off all power in between the sexes.

Genesis 19:8 Tells of a man named Lot who offers his daughters to a crowd of would be angel rapers. Later, Lot impregnates his own daughters after God kills his wife for simply looking back at the remains of her city.

Genesis 38:16-24 Tells a very interesting story of a man named Judah whom lived with his widowed daughter in law. His daughter in law was grieving and wearing the veils of mourning which Judah (a rather stupid man) mistook for the clothing of a prostitute. He ended up impregnating his daughter in law and she left the city. On a later date Judah sees the young woman again and demanded she be burned for being a prostitute (I like how only the woman is punished when THEY BOTH engaged in the sexual act). It wasn’t until Judah recognized the woman as his daughter in law and she was with his child, that he decided not to kill her. Basically, Judah can commit incest, use a prostitute (in his mistaken perception), and impregnate a MUCH younger woman, yet he thinks she is the one deserving of death.

Exodus 21:3-4 Says that if a male slave is given a wife by his master (regardless of how long they are wed, how much they love each other or if they have kids) he can not leave servanthood with his wife or children. The woman and children are merely property of the master and their personal happiness or sanctity of family doesn’t matter.

Exodus 21:7 God not only sanctions selling ones daughter into slavery, but he also gives out laws on how it should be done.

Exodus 21:10 God ordains men taking several wives and even sets up laws as to how multiple wives should be handled.

Leviticus 12:1-8 Explains that a woman has to be purified after giving birth because she is “unclean”. It goes on to say that birthing a male is cleaner then birthing a female, hence a mother must purify TWICE as long when having a daughter. This is BLATANT sexism from the point of birth. A woman is dirty simply for being a woman; this is obviously very biased and chauvinistic.

Leviticus 15:19-30 Explains that a woman having her menstruation must be avoided to the point of not even touching what she has touched. It is quite curious that women are punished for simply having a biological function that “God” claims to have created. What is so just about vilifying what you created?

Leviticus 18:19 Goes onto say that even LOOKING at a menstruating woman is wrong.

Leviticus 19:20 Says that if a man has sex with a slave or betrothed woman he must then “scourge” her. Scourging is a term for a severe flogging or whipping. I find it quite curious that the woman shall be punished to the point of a beating for such an occurrence, yet the man gets to go free for the deed.

Leviticus 21:9 Explains that unchaste daughters of priests must be burnt to death. What about his unchaste sons? Of course this isn’t even answered in the Torah, we are to assume yet again that men have the power to do as they wish and a woman must suffer the punishment for BOTH of them.

Leviticus 27:3-7 God places a dollar value on human life; with women worth less than men.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now that you have seen the source of sexism, let's re-post what YOU stated.
"But it didn’t end with merely hating men..." and "Feminism as an ideology set out to destroy the bond between men and women"

There will be SOME Feminists with a grudge, that's for sure. But most women just want to be treated equal and want to have the right to speak in church.

There is always a rubber band affect with oppressed classes. Look at us Christians, we killed off the Indians to find "freedom" from oppression. How dark and ironic is that?

 

You are correct about ancient times and the bible but that is irrelevant to modern feminism especially 3rd wave feminism which is what we have now.

Feminists and even women in general are not looking to be treated equal.

Most women like to be treated as SPECIAL. Feminists want to oppress others and be treated as superior.

The struggle for equal rights ended long ago there are no rights that men have which women do not have. However thanx to feminists women have some rights which men do not. So much for wanting equal rights which is a consistent lie feminists claim.

No one has the right to speak in a church unless the church members allow it. Churches are private clubs and therefore make their own rules for membership. Most let women speak but some do not and many forbid women from being clergy. Don't like it? Find some other church or grow a brain and be atheist.

 

the "Feminists" you mention are of such a minority it hardly worth mentioning

I think we can agree the bible had it wrong.... but

sometimes the church members take that into the real wold though, look at the clerk refusing to treat people like equals

.

 

A minority sure, insignificant? Far from it.

It is this minority which has brought us draconian and brutal domestic violence laws which do nothing to combat violence against women but instead erodes constitutional rights for many, mostly men.

They are fighting hard to follow this up with atrocious laws such as the misnamed violence against women act which would do more to undermine basic rights and protection under the law while ignoring real crimes. Hillary is a major supporter of this bill.

They are pushing laws for " equal " pay when no such laws are needed. Based on false claims such as a pay gap which does not exist. But of course such laws would allow even more interference in business than already exists while only lowering pay for many and creating more welfare for others. Once again Hillary supports these bills.

One must also remember that Obama recently joined with radical feminists to fight the mythical epidemic of rape on college campuses. He did so by instituting policies which coerce universities to investigate and take action against alleged sexual assault and rape on college campuses. This of course strips away due process by removing such accusations from the realm of law enforcement and placing it in the hands of unqualified but biased administrators. It also ignores the victims of such crimes.

They may be a minority but they do have great influence and are quite dangerous.

The clerk is where she belongs.

 

It's a shame what they have done to western women. Even if there is a good western woman out there, they are still poison to anybody with two nickles to rub together. You can't raise a family for fear the courts will sentence you to 18 some years of paying for children that you cannot be a father to.

Some guys still risk it, but it's like handling a venomous snake. They might not bite you, but if they do, you're in for a world of hurt.

 

I believe universities are biased and should not be involved in investigating rape, all rape victims should call 911 and get the real police involved

"The clerk is where she belongs."

agree 100%

.

 

Yup, those "evil" feminists insist men not be allowed to beat, rape and kill women with impunity......some people don't like that , they see it as eroding men's "rights"..

 

Take some time and study logical fallacies. Your picture should be in the dictionary next to the definition.

No one advocates men being able to rape with impunity. In fact few men would commit such a heinous crime and such crimes have not been protected or permitted.

They are not opposed to rapists being free to commit their crimes because such a scenario is fiction.

Clearly you know what I said was accurate as you did not address it making up fantasy instead.

Did the duke lacrosse players rape with impunity? Did Rolling Stone uncover a gangrape where the criminals acted with impunity?

State with specifics where in the us such criminals act with impunity. State with specifics where such crimes are happening to such an extent that it justifies eliminating constitutional protections for the accused.

 

Correction. The Clerk was not seeking to undermine anyone or any liberal campaign...she is simply following the 1st amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"

And that is exactly what the SCOTUS decision does. It establishes religious practice and it violates the free exercise of religion.

She is going to jail to begin the process to repeal this disaster. Bravo to her.

 

The fantasy that feminism is evil derives from misogyny.

I never mentioned the Duke people or Rolling stone ....


Your ignorance of history doesn't excuse misogyny.

It wasn't until the 1970's that it was deemed illegal for men to beat their wives......and it wasn't a crime for men to RAPE their wives...until feminists made it a crime.


The world didn't start the day you were born.

 

You are quite wrong.

I never said feminism in its current form is evil but it is. That is simple fact derived from their actions lies and beliefs. Not mysogyny. In fact the knee jerk reaction of labeling honest criticism as misogyny is more proof of feminist lies and contradiction. They do not want equal rights but superior rights.

Your claim it is misogyny is baseless, ignorant and cowardly opinion and nothing more.

I said you mentioned duke or rolling stone. I mentioned them asking specific questions which you are running away from.

The facts ABSOLUTELY prove it is you who is ignorsnt of history.

Before the 1970s it was illegal nationwide for a man to beat his wife. There were no states which allowed it and all states had laws forbidding it .

Your claim that it was only made illegal in the 1970s is an absolute falsehood.

The courts made it illegal for men to rspe their wives which at one time was ignored by law. On the other hand it applied both ways and it was also legal for women to rape their husband's and is still ignored when they do.

Once again though you have to dodge and evade in cowardly fashion.

I asked for specifics of men raping with impunity you gave none. I did not ask about history.

Your claim that feminists oppose such crimes is proven false as you cannot and will not cite one example. You also cannot and will not address the facts

 

Your claim that feminism is evil is misogyny , baseless, ignorant and cowardly opinion and nothing more.


Of course you didn't ask about history, you don't know it. And it shows just how beneficial feminism was and is.

 

Wrong my claim is supported by facts yours is not.

Yours is strictly knee jerk labeling to avoid facts.

History supports me and proves you wrong therefore you are the one ignorant of history

Now answer my questions or run along

 

Misogyny is general hatred of women.

Feminists are not all or even most women. In fact quite a few feminists are men. Feminists do not speak for or represent all or most women.

Feminism is an idealology and feminists are acolytes of said idealology.

There fore any claim that opposition to feminism equals misogyny is a proven lie.

 

Yet another paean to oppression in general by conservatives, butthurt because the people they have formerly been able to beat, rape, kill, enslave and repress have finally decided to OBJECT.

Imagine that, a woman who can't understand how much it benefits her to make 75% of what a man does for the same work, how ongoing discrimination against her should so satisfy her basic nature and how men who want to compel her to have a rapist's children even if it kills her have her best interests in mind.

It truly boggles the mind that anyone, even conservatives, should put forth the above and expect anyone who is sane to agree, but then these are the same people who think we should give all our money to the wealthy so they can give it back to us and generally maintain that none of us are really happy unless we're miserable

 

The verse finishes of by saying a husband shall “rule” over his woman, stripping us off all power in between the sexes.


The little, rancid porker John Hagee loves that verse in the bible. One of the favorite rants that he shouts to the heavens, and that gets his belly jiggling is: "A wife shall obey her husband!!!!!!!! Creepy.

 

Where have I heard this argument before?

Replace feminists and women with gay and homosexual. Or, replace with black and minorities. Pages from the same playbook.

 

Nope does not work.

Your comparing apples and oranges.

 

Today, feminism supports the idiotic "war on women" accusation.

If you don't want the government pay for some law student's contraception so she can f--- like an animal in heat, you're labeled "anti-woman".

 

Good observation.