Imagine there is no leftists

So We have to eliminate the return on investing capital since that doesn't actually involve working? Or does the money working count?

 

Well, I stand corrected then. But they are certainly on the way out, and that is due to improved technology. The whole coal mining industry is on the way out, due to improved technology.

And it is capitalism which has driven technological change, not leftist politics.

 

^^^^

The only correct answer, so far.

 

You plagiarize a leftist.Take out the left and you loose all U.S. allies....righties can't even stand each other...shown in the GOP....ISIS is right wing fascist too.

 

All work counts, investing capital provides liquidity to market allowing others to benefit. It takes skill, effort , experience and education to be able to invest capital. Why is it any less work then hammering a nail into a wall?

 

Without leftists, there would be nobody in the country with an ideology that requires them to agitate society in order to gain political advantage. There would be a lot more stability, which is the enemy of progressivism.

 

What I find funny about the left is that you wouldn't be able to tell if this post was made by a 20 year old college student or a 68 year old retiree. The combination of left-wing politics and Keith Olbermann/Jon Stewart Liebowitz type media consumption tends to stunt maturity, at any age. Really shows the level on which the left is operating on.

 

Nonsense. Leftist didn't stop that prosperity did by making it unnecessary for ten year olds to work for the family to survive.

 

Imagine there's no leftists.

Isn't hard to do.

No illegal immigration

And no ISIS, too.

 

Without leftists we'd still have an agricultural feudal society.

 

Trump is speaking to the right in terms they understand..... at the 4th grade level so that pretty much sinks your theory.

http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2015...rump-talks-to-voters-at-a-fourth-grade-level/

 

Well, ya, but righties don't mind cheap labor.....no matter what it is.....that's why they hire illegals and don't REALLY want to do anything about the border.

 

'Righties' on securing the border:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/immigration-reform
https://www.tedcruz.org/issues/secure-the-border/
https://marcorubio.com/issues-2/marco-rubio-immigration-plan-border-security-legal/

'Lefties' on securing the border:
https://berniesanders.com/a-fair-and-humane-immigration-policy/
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/immigration-reform/

 

Imagine there's no leftist
It's easy if you try
No paved roads below us
Above us only tyranny
Imagine all the people
Being bled by the few... ooh-ooh

Imagine there's no US army
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And more religious freaks too
Imagine all the people
Living life working...

You may say I'm an idiot
But I'm not the only one
There's also cousin-brother Bub over there
And the world should be like us

Imagine no diversity
I wonder if you can
A world for the one-percenter
A brotherhood of thieves
Imagine all the people
Living dull, secure lives of devotion... Oooh-ooh

You may say I'm an idiot
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world ... well (*)(*)(*)(*) the world!

 

You BELIEVE what candidates say ?!?! ....they say what their supporters want to hear.....[B]IF[/B] they were really concerned about illegals they'd jail every CEO who employed them.....THAT would end the influx of illegals...

 

If they were really concerned about illegals they'd jail every CEO who employed them.....THAT would end the influx of illegals...

Yup.

 

Without progressivism there would be no fire, no bows and arrows, no animal skins, no crop farming, no cheese, no bread, etc, etc, etc.

 

Sorry, but can you explain how redistributing power and wealth via Marxism is responsible for these things?

 

So, what you're saying is that absolutely no one wants to get rid of illegal immigrants?

Plus, as far as I'm concerned, the Houston Texans don't seem like an entity that has a plan on hiring illegals anytime soon.

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contrib.php?cycle=2016&id=N00033085&type=f

 

Well not no one. But not the GOP or the democrats.

 

Your misunderstanding of the terminology is not my problem.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/progressivism?

progressivism
noun

1.the principles and practices of progressives.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/progressive

progressive

adjective

1.favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, asopposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, especially inpolitical matters:a progressive mayor.


2.making progress toward better conditions; employing or advocatingmore enlightened or liberal ideas, new or experimental methods, etc.:a progressive community.


3.characterized by such progress, or by continuous improvement.

4.(initial capital letter) of or relating to any of the Progressive parties inpolitics.

5.going forward or onward; passing successively from one member of aseries to the next; proceeding step by step.

6.noting or pertaining to a form of taxation in which the rate increaseswith certain increases in taxable income.

7.of or relating to progressive education :progressive schools.


noun

10.a person who is progressive or who favors progress or reform,especially in political matters.

11.(initial capital letter) a member of a Progressive party.

12.Grammar.

• the progressive aspect.
• a verb form or construction in the progressive, as are thinking inThey are thinking about it.

 

Exactly.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, until I see otherwise, I'm gonna go with a candidate that at least has a plan to fix the problem rather than no one at all.

 

A "plan"....or a "claim"....

There's a distinct difference.

 

""""So, what you're saying is that absolutely no one wants to get rid of illegal immigrants?"""


No, I never posted that....just another righty "misinterpretation" ...

 

There is no one running that has that current plan. Your candidate can promise he will give everyone a unicorn but that will not happen either if both parties don't want it.