This is what has Hillary terrified...

A gay man speaking the truth.

Perhaps he's not "the good kind" of gay...thats what dems refer to gays as.

[video=youtube;Lgl53EXInPc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgl53EXInPc[/video]

You can see the fear in the hosts eyes.

 

That was hilarious!

 

Dude, I watched the video, and I can tell you, trying to take anyone who works at Breibart seriously is like trying to take Alex Jones' claim lizard people live among us seriously. Nice attempt though. Speaking as a dem though, gay is gay. I don't think there's a "good kind" of gay. A 70-year old guy could make love to Donald Trump, or a 70-year old guy could make love to Al Franken at Whole Foods, and I still wouldn't care.

 

All hail king milo , the wrecker of all things progressive.

 

The democrat party feels otherwise. They get your support.

 

Today Hillary had to walk back calling millions of Americans "deplorable" but she still blames the alt right for her own shortcomings.

Its time Hillary did some serious self-assessment.

 

You do have to admit, however, that some of Trump's policies ARE deplorable, and those who support those policies through and through could be considered, "deplorable."

 

Deplorable is a subjective term, leftist.


Hillary will take yet another hit with this-as if she needed another challenge.

 

Cheap attack.

I know the term, "deplorable" is subjective. And much of Trump's agenda IS deplorable, proposals neglecting two important principles that make America what it is. The ability to welcome multiculturalism, and the ability to practice any religion freely, including Islam. To a extent, Hillary has a point.

 

The left handed dont understand, theyre offensive......

 

He should have at least asked them what they are on about when they asked if the alt-right is homophobic. Just saying "racist" or "homophobic" and then hoping the bait will be taken is getting sooooo old.

 

Wasn't one of our core values, at the start of the European invasion of this continent, much less the founding of this Republic, the fact that religious freedom was sacrosanct. That coming here wasn't a continuance of religious oppression? But now, Christianity wants to shut the doors. We (by we, I mean ass hats) have tenets that allow us to judge the value of other people's religion. I doubt that anyone in the Republican party has given Mohammed Ali the benefit of the doubt. I think that he would float like a butterfly and sting you if you espoused disrespect for his religion. You ass hats now think that since Ali is dead that no one will punch you out for disrespect. Go ahead, disrespect Islam because you were too chicken (*)(*)(*)(*) to disrespect it in front of someone that chose to defend his religion.

 

When has america been multicultural? Back when great great grandpa was importing cultures from africa? Maybe back during the indian wars, perhaps? Oh wait, it must have been during the civil war when the slave owning culture was fighting the manufacturing culture. Back when those guys at the alamo were welcoming the mexican culture with open arms?

And no, we don't allow people to practice religion freely. The mormons couldn't so they tried moving to a place they could, but we found them and forced them to change their religion to the point their entire polygamous culture was made illegal. The muslims are not free to practice their religion because many of the core tenets of their relligion are illegal.

They are free to change their religion so that it's islamic in name only, but that's it. Until this happens, they're not welcome.

 

Rubbish. America was built on assimilation. And Islam, for it to be practiced, brings sharia for the muslims. We have secular law, and no place for sharia. Trump also believes in what America was founded on, national sovereignty. Which means you control immigration. During the great depression, we basically sealed our borders and stopped immigration, because we did not need more unemployed people, and we needed to employ our own people We do not need immigration today. If we ever get to where we need workers, we will do as we always did, and allow people in, as long as they will assimilate. If you do not want to assimilate, but bring your complete culture with you, stay in that culture, and let us keep ours.

We have been around long enough as a species, to find out what works and what does not work. It looks like modern liberals never learned what 6000 years of civilization taught humanity. They want to (*)(*)(*)(*) into the wind, and stay dry. It has never worked out like that. Division creates conflict, a hard, historical fact. So assimilation was intelligence. For it sought to minimize conflict within societies. Multiculturalism creates conflict, because it creates division. If you want a healthy society, instead one with costly conflicts, you assimilate people and you have a national policy that does that, as we used to have. What humanity learned through trial and error has been thrown at the door, by irrational, incoherent, modern liberals. At least the old liberalism had some damned sense.

 

Trump would serve himself and his chances of winning by walking back some of his idiotic statements immediately after making them.

 

What you just said, was it was subjectively deplorable.

This is an admission that there are other valid viewpoints.

Which is why characterizing Trumps policies with such silly terms (lefties love subjective mush) is so ineffective.

There just isn't enough meat to Hillary's arguments-and her corruption and blanket smears of 70+ million Americans who support Trumps policies (which stand on their own, regardless of childish smears) isn't going to help her anymore.

BTW, Hillary used the term deplorable several times-and put it in her teleprompter. Bill called miner from the south "coal people" and disrespected them because they now vote republican. Hillary meant for it to be there. Her VP pick says she should have kept it in.

Its a sign of desperation. The Clintons are in internal disarray.

- - - Updated - - -

They are the door to door salesmen of politics.

 

Im not religious and I support closing the doors to muslim immigration (any high risk demo for terrorism, as per our own FBI).

Who are the faces of this "Christianity" calling to shut the doors?

There are lots of minorities who are Christians and support open border democrats (paradoxically)

Are they to blame?

 

lol! It wasn't about religious freedom, but rather to escape religious persecution. Most of the religious types were fleeing the catholic church. The anabaptists (now known as the amish) were being attacked, and of course the protestants who were being hounded due to the reformation which wasn't exactly non-violent.

As for Ali, he was just a boxer. If he wanted to change his name, nobody cared.

 

You are so full of crap that I can't even begin to describe it. We also interned American citizens in Japanese internment camps. We decided, against all of our principles, to inter anyone that seemed Japanese to us. Yes, there was a war. It was a war against the Japanese. They attacked us. Yes, you are so clever, that it seems reasonable to you to imprison our own citizens, because there is the possibility that they may want to fire-bomb us. What happened to religious freedom? What happened to lady Liberty?

We did not make Japanese soldiers suffer the way that they made our soldiers suffer. That is bad on them. But to be like them, is not an American value. We are not Trump. We are not ass hats.

 

Well, maybe the 'Christians' include ass hats. I think I mentioned this before. The Christians that are calling for closing the border are you, ass hat freak.

 

What you failed to include that it was a Democrat President and a Democrat majority in the Houses of Congress that mandated the internment of not only Japanese but Germans and Italians. Although the internment of Germans and Italians were not as large as the Japanese, they nevertheless were interned. BTW, there is no talk of internment here, it is the close scrutiny of those who want to come to America. BTW that included the segregation of our troops.

Internment of German Americans
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_German_Americans
During WWII, German nationals and German Americans in the US were ... mass expulsion of ethnic Germans and ethnic Italians from the ... A total of 11,507 people of German ancestry were interned during the war.

~~~~~~~~~~~~​

Internment of Italian Americans .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Italian_Americans
The internment of Italian Americans refers to the government's internment of Italian nationals in the United States during World War II, similar to that of the Internment of Japanese Americans and Internment of German Americans. ... In 1942 there were 695,000 Italian immigrants in the United States. Some 1881 were taken ...

 

Are the two exclusive to each other?

There were many reasons europeans came here. Religious freedom (to observe as they wished) was common.

- - - Updated - - -

It sounds like you are reduced to simple name calling.

This suggests your argument isn't very compelling.

I accept your concession.

 

No problem. Hillary will just put him in the basket of deplorables....

 

This is basic history and yet it escapes most lefties.

- - - Updated - - -

I think Hillary does not like him because he's a gay migrant.

 

While we're bashing Hillary, why don't we look at what Hillary did for the firefighters health after 9/11, and what Trump didn't do for the firefighters health after 9/11. It was Clinton projecting calm in a tense situation. I know users like US Conservative don't want to hear (nor recognize) it, but Hillary is actually human.