Why do lefties on this forum think at anyone has a RIGHT to come to the US

Worse, some/man lefties seem to believe the Constitution extends to protect and empower Abdul in his shop in Cairo...Where did that idea come from.

 

Not an issue - we will stay away in droves and that tourist industry that has all those jobs attached?

Good luck with that!!!

- - - Updated - - -

Native American Indians might just agree that would have been a good idea

 

Delusion???? Nobody has any right to enter any country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

In that case your best is nowhere near enough. The fact that you use the term 'xenophobes' tells us how little you understand the demographic opposed to mass immigration/refugee acceptance.

And the 'reality' you refer to has nothing to do with actual reality. A reality in which people of all colours and ethnicities are opposed to open borders.

 

Funny how only white majority nations seem to be the ones that need to be told to let other races in and overpopulate them. Funny. I don't see anyone telling the Japanese to be less Japanese, or the Chinese to be less Chinese, or that Africa needs diversity.

But of course most of the wealth is in majority white countries. And wealth requires intelligence. That is, money doesn't mean anything unless people have invented and produced things to purchase with it.

Anyway, refugees coming in, over 92% are immediately on food stamps/welfare and 5 years later over 60% are still on food stamps/welfare. It's a very bad deal for the native population to be forced to take these people in. These people need to stay in their own countries and fight and sacrifice for political change there. Our ancestors did it here. They should follow their example.

 

Speaking for the Forum.

They are brainwashed with the American dream.

Like the refugees sleeping in french tunnels, grassy knolls, on muddy fields. But they don't want France. They want the British dream!

 

When my ancestors came to the country, EVERYONE worked, and the country was not 20 trillion dollars in debt.

BTW my ancestors, and no other immigrants wanted to overthrow the government, or install their laws.

 

What does that mean, that you can't accept one immigrant and reject another?

 

Nobody cares about your misinterpretations. It's not a right, but you know that.

 

The collective labels anyone who disagrees with them a racist/sexist/bigot.

The term liberal has changed. People who call themselves liberals are anything but individualist who want small government. They are collectivist that worship the establishment. Drones is a much more accurate discription of the average liberal today. As for me being a high school white male... little old for that. But it's clear you stereo type white high school males as being kkk types.

 

Liberals don't really think, they "feel" their way through a problem.

 

LOL. You're definitely triggered by the Trump win. You deserve an award for projection, as we know the snowflake Leftists are the ones with their festered noggins looking for fascists under every rock. It's great viewing though, to watch their emotional tizzies, for example a harpy like Elizabeth Warren screeching at the top of her lungs leading an airport protest. Lmao

Yes, you liberals are demanding, in a de facto sense, that we allow poorly vetted refugees and illegals to come in. Because like Obama, you don't want the immigration laws enforced, especially when it comes to non-whites. And that's why only liberal controlled cities are sanctuary cities, another example.

And a conservative Republican judge? Lmao. Like Bush was a conservative, adding more debt in any President in history up until Obama, adding more federal workers every year, more regulations, more entitlements (prescription drug benefit), and overall increasing the size and scope of government in everyone's lives. You talking about that "conservative"? Lmao. Either liberals are too stupid to know what a conservative is, or they're always in lying fraud deception mode to confuse as many potential voters as possible.

By the way, how much is Soros paying you to post here?

 

So - the American Civil war did not happen?

- - - Updated - - -

You know I give up reading after I see the word "snowflake" because I know the rest of the post is going to be a right wing fantasy

Full of conspiracy theory and drivel with negative amounts of common sense

 

It's called the zeroth amendment and the text is found on a plaque near the Statue of Liberty.

 

Straw Man. The American Civil War was not a war started by immigrants, nor did it have anything to do with immigration. It was fought by natives, one group of which wanted to separate. The real animosity started with the Tariff of Abominations.

It's good that you gave up because you wouldn't want to be bothered by things like facts or logic. And sorry, I should have thrown in "cuck" as well. My bad.

 

Neith has terrorism anything to do with immigration

 

"Both sides" is a paranoid construct of the ideologically-impaired. Your messiah is not above the law. No president is.

He just throws more tantrumps when he is put in his place by the U S Constitution - as championed by one conservative, Republican judge in this instance, and his cultists get very pissy whenever that happens.

He won't be allowed to persist in crapping on American values.

 

I guess that the indigenous aboriginals of Australia and Māori's of New Zealand would concur.

 

Spewing your mindless ideological dogma does not address the question: Who is "demanding" that "we allow allow an untold number of poorly vetted refugees from some of the most dangerous nations on earth to simply walk in the door" as has been falsely claimed?

Trump cultists bottom feed on crap like this and recycle it but, when challenged to name names and document their wild accusations, they become flustered and resort to their silly hissyfits.

 

Try not to become flustered and hysterical when I ask you a simple question: Who is advocating an immigration policy of "open borders"? Do they have names?

You'll wee your pantaloons if you persist in scaring yourself with such airy-fairy notions.

 

[h=1]Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/20/hillary-clinton-embraces-george-soros-radical-visi/[/h]

 

Wrong, immigration of certain groups has a great deal to do with terrorism and other crimes such as sexual assaults, as certain groups are far more prone to that type of behavior.

- - - Updated - - -

 

The only one throwing a hissyfit is you and your fellow Leftists. You do this of course when the truth destroys your irrational policy positions and exposes your lies.

Gatewood just gave you the answer: [h=1]Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/20/hillary-clinton-embraces-george-soros-radical-visi/[/h]

Oops

 

I think the question is whether people have a right to not be judged by their religious beliefs. The idea that people are due that freedom caused folks to climb on the Mayflower in 1620.





​

 

The so-called president is now directing his hysterical tweetantrumps at the judiciary, have savaged US intelligent services as being like "Nazis."

His cult is orgasmic over the spectacle of the ingénue crapping on the US Constitution and American values.

Patriots across the political spectrum are disgusted by his his narcissistic, egotistical, megalomaniacal self-pleasuring perversion.