Bill O'Reilly has been fired

Maybe they can hire Mike Huckabee back. Huckabee had such a reputation for being nice to his guests that even liberals completely opposed to him were quite eager to appear.

 

So what happens with pretty much every company ever

Given it took a while to fire him that does not mean that FNC perpetuates racial hatred/sexual assault - their languidness regarding handling their cases of sexual harassment and racial hatred does not necessarily demonstrate that sort of culture - it could just mean they need to overhaul their HR.

 

It is relatively sad that he was only removed because of sponsorship exodus rather than for being a bad person.

 

Being that Trump came to his defense, he should speak to the *****-grabber-in-chief for advice.

Why does the right wing set their own traps for comebacks? Too funny.

 

Sponsors do have a tendency to enforce a kind of censorship on commercial media. Kind of sad, really, but that's what they get for relying on sponsors.

 

I wonder if he'll tweet about this. I figure there's a good chance.

 

geese...

 

I'm not defending trump. I bet orially becomes a leftist super star.

 

The rev huckleberry would fit right in, he could continue whining where
O’Reilly left off on the war on xmas

 

Does this mean Bill is banished? Never again able to hold a job? Bill Clinton still can hold a job. And Bill was loved by Democrats. Yet lesser hound dogs than Bill Clinton get banished. Figures....

 

Well, they're still cheerleading for the orange ***** grabber, so their hypocrisy about sexual harassment is laughable.
O'Reilly was just losing them money so he suddenly became expendable.

 

The Dirty Old Man's Network!

 

Like the Republican Party, Fox has a deep bench. They'll be fine.

 

Indeed. It is the censorship inherent to corporate sponsorship. It would be interesting to see a network such as Fox actually move from that to being listener supported, the way many YouTube channels and podcasts are now, and of course the way public broadcasting has long been.

 

if only Fox was that based

 

Hey it's our network not the left's Network. You got a problem with that?

 

You sure 'bout that?

 

[delet]

 

Someone please define what exactly is a principled Conservative. That would appear to be an oxymoron.

 

I was right on my Thread today.It was little snotrag attorney
Lisa Bloom { daughter of Gloria Allred } who used her smear tactics
and access to the media to force pressure and oust O'Reilly.
The same ******ned approach her Mommy uses,time and again.
They { Daughter and Mom } find some itsy bitsy little item or
thing said by someone and spread it around as if Godzilla was in
town.Lisa bloom is on - Lawrence O''Donnell - right now insisting how
' Scared ' her client was and that was the motivation to Go Full Hog
against O'Reilly.Little Lisa Bloom lawyer pulled this kinda crap
before and after the George Zimmerman verdict also on MSNBC.
There needs to be some kind of process to go after the Gloria Allred's of
the world.Pathetic ambulance chasing little haters who use this disgusting
compliant media for use in smearing those they feel emboldened by.
I'm not going to defend O'Reilly.But I certaintly aren't about to sit idly
by and see another example of Gloria Allred OR Daughter { Lisa Bloom }
style justice.

 

O'Reilly is done; it's highly unlikely any of the legacy networks will touch him. I believe we've seen the end of him for a while if not permanently.

 

Conservatism is a dead ideology, because it is a dead ideology the conservatives failed to win elections after 2008 and frankly if Kerry were a better candidate, he would've won in 2004 too. It's a dead ideology because you want to 'conserve' something that's not there. A State that was no longer. Now, you could build a State to sustain and to conserve, but you don't even do this.

And so while the Liberal programs eternally fail our country, at least they ARE programs. Since Conservatives offer nothing, people will be Liberal by default even if their programs fail us. Better a half-assed attempt, then no attempt at all. As for us Nationalists, I think we made two crucial errors.

The first error, is definitely falling for Donald Trump. An error I largely avoided, but I hedged back and forth on the need to defend what was now an elected president, so that the country doesn't go overboard. But now I calculate that it's too late and the country will capsize whether I support or don't support Donald Trump.

The second error, and here I agree with conservatives: It was the error of our alliance. We are Nationalists, Syndicalists and Third Positionists. You are Conservatives, you want to conserve a State that was no longer, we want to build a State that lasts for eternity. Opposite views of the world. In addition, we are not militarily-minded, contrary to what others think. So we can't defend a military-industrial-complex or a concept of policing the world which undermines our NATL defense.

The alliance may very well have led to a Republican victory in name only, but it really only served to damage the Nationalist Revolution.

But it's also true that many independents are anti-Liberal. If we Nationalists focus on it, we can become the new majority party in America. As an actual party.

 

...or Donald Trump on how to get away with it.