Terrorist attack in London on Wesminister Bridge

Lol nonsense. The death toll re muslims on Muslims alone has been going up up up every Ramadan for the last decade or more. If you want to cite the Quran, name the book and verse, and I'll tell you where it's been abrogated and no longer applies.

 

[QU

Your quote does not state that Muslims must not attack during Ramadan. The very first big battle fought by Mohamed, Battle of Badr, was fought during Ramadan. There are others also celebrated.

http://www.arabnews.com/news/603436

You are being tricked by Muslims who are trying to distract you from their blood thirsty history. Listen to what Muslims say to each other, not what they say to the kuffar.

 

Absolutely, no doubt about it, the Israelis must be involved too.

 

9.5

 

notme, for the record, I don't think that Christians/Jews (and not their texts, either) are better than Muslims/Islam. I love equally.

 

You're not seriously going to claim that Christianity (the religion of god/Jesus/Bible) doesn't have a long and barbaric history, are you? Too bad that god/Jesus don't give a crap about humanity or they'd have come down in the last 1900 years and educated humanity more than the mistake-ridden book (Bible) educates us - which is appalling.

 

They RARELY answer my hard-to-answer questions - if a person pays close attention to that then they'll see what I mean. We. Are. Winning.

 

You are right the blame lies with the perpetrators, but I would rather be in Europe with the threat of terrorism than in the US with that Moron in charge. Trump is more dangerous than all of the UK attackers in the last few weeks put together. More people will die from his ignorant, egotistical, money grabbing policies than any terrorist organisation has killed in ear

 

Yeah I've been smiling for a while now, was kinda interested to see if he'd/she'd answer "this time", but part of me just wanted to see the monkey dance.

 

Yeah ok, just keep your hands out of our pockets mm'K?

 

Christianity (as it's name implies) has a lot to do with Christ. Christ preached "love thy neighbor", Christians adhere to Christ's preachings.

 

You mean THIS psycho? "Don't imagine that I came to bring peace to the earth! I came not to bring peace, but a sword." Mt 10:34.

 

Notice they never bring up pagan brutalism or Islamo-butchery in historical context. the Christians are absolute ***** cats in comparison, which is why they need to peddle all that ridiculusly hysterical exaggeration and outright lies re Christianity.

 

Or maybe its like this... and most consider it a waste of time.

 

No, they don't. Christians aspire to Christ's teachings but accept that they will fall short of his godly behaviour because they only men.

If you are a Christian you can kill, rape and butcher as much as you like, and then repent. And it's OK.

 

Stronger as in stronger armies - just be thankful that Allah isn't real (he doesn't answer Muslim prayers or Muslim nations would be stronger than most all nations of course), so Muslims don't yet have very strong armies, or they'd attack us per the Qur'an and Mohammad's example of spreading Jihad by the sword. Mohammad could win military victories, but as we've seen vs. Israel and the US (Iraq/Afghanistan), Muslims are not very good at fighting fairly - so they resort to terrorism. But if they DO get militarily strong enough then the world is in big trouble - they'll spread their Sharia Law to every country in the world per the Qur'an ("fight them until all worship is for Allah").

 

But Mohammad attacked during that month, so that's nonsense.

 

No, they do care about me/us, so if they had a good rebuttal they'd provide it. It's not a "waste of time" to provide good rebuttals to a person's critics on this forum....that's basically what the forum is for.

 

Yes, "no explanation is possible" because when one is driven by their fear (fear of "hell"), no amount of logic, reason, common sense, etc. will get them to see the truth - they are scared little lambs - scared silly by Jesus' barbaric threats of "hell" - for simply thinking for one's self (uh, I choose to NOT believe the story of "walking on water", nor "casting demons out" of a bunch of pigs, etc.) - I believe in reality too much.

 

For instance, Smartmouthwoman, when I condemn Jesus and pals for still, after 2000 years or so, giving their impressionable young children a book that says the following, you can't counter with anything but faith, can you? "women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church”

 

I am far better than your "Jesus", ethically, because, for example, I condemn Jesus' dad for his dad's barbaric genocide ("flood"), that was even worse than Hitler's genocide (Hitler didn't kill virtually all animals in HIS genocide attempt). I assume I'm more ethical than you as well, but hopefully you can prove me wrong, and I can learn from you.

 

lol rubbish. that 'verse' abrogates almost all previous verses re 'peaceful discourse'; it is in fact the most popular verse your terrorist Islmao-Nazi buddies use to justify their mass murders.

 

Who follows Q5:33 better, ISIS (they DO crucify, per 5:33), or the "moderate" (i.e. less pious) Muslims who apparently DON'T follow Q5:33? It's obvious that ISIS are better Muslims than your "moderate" Muslim neighbor is.

 

No surprise the meaning of that verse is lost on you. lol

 

Q9:5 calls for murder, yes.
Too bad the British PM doesn't realize this....she seems to think that internet providers are somehow to blame for Islamic terrorism, so she wants them to crack down on free speech.