Wasserman-Schultz IT Aide Arrested At Dulles Airport While Attempting To Flee Country

They are not up in arms because they're moral reprobates. The synonym is 'socialist'.

 

Tom, we already told you the story broke on Politico. It's not fake news. Fox has been reporting it all day. It's MSM that is not your friend if you are looking for truth.

 

I absolutely love how Mark Steyn writes. Talk about biting prose: that article cut through the bone.

 

He's not looking for truth.

 

In addition to what I told you previously, that the story broke on Politico, it does appear that some MSM is finally picking it up be sides FOX who was on top from the start.

Here is what I found from NBC News and CBS -more than a day late but I guess they couldn't hold it out any longer.
It also on an FBI RSS feed

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...ltz-aide-arrested-trying-flee-country-n786651

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/former-wasserman-schultz-staffer-arrested-for-charges-of-bank-fraud/

Original Politico
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/25/debbie-wasserman-schultz-aide-arrest-240960

Truth hurts but it's real

 

You nailed it!

DC Detective of Seth Rich Murder: Follow the Awan Arrest Closely – Connect the Dots to “Other” Cases

 

To be fair though, there's a lot going on, on both sides, that needs to be addressed. There were clear political influences this election that we haven't seen publicly before (at least recently).

 

JOURNALISM IS ABOUT COVERING IMPORTANT STORIES. WITH A PILLOW, UNTIL THEY STOP MOVING: Networks Cover Up Wasserman Schultz’s Shady IT Staffer Being Arrested, Fired.

Just think of broadcast news as Democrat operatives with Chyrons, and it all makes sense.

 

He's great! You may also enjoy Steyn on the same subject. http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/07/...z-staffer-scandal-mark-steyn-collusion-russia

 

Calls Grow For Debbie Wasserman Schultz to Testify Before Congress on IT Staffer Imran Awan

 

Well... the Major 3 Broadcast Networks had over 24 hours to cover this story. Here are the results.

• ABC - Zero Coverage
• NBC - Zero Coverage
• CBS - 37 seconds mention (high level) on the morning show.

This is a huge story that has all the missing components of the Russia / Trump story, yet they refuse to cover it. When we say "Media Bias", this is certainly part of it. The leftists spew their propaganda to the "Useful Idiots". As a reminder they ignored Fast and Furious, Benghazi (for months), and a whole lot more that makes the Democratic Party look bad.

 

Democrat intelligence is an oxymoron, see Nov. 8th 2016.

 

And they relied on telling their supporters that any opposition to their party was 'racist', 'fascist', 'sexist', 'homophobic', 'anti-poor', 'Islamophobic' and so on. This led to a mountain of distrust among the American people and of course, even when the truth is out, these divisions sewn by the leftists continue.

In fact they're still playing the 'Islamophobic' card in this case. Luckily there are many good and honest people who understand the game being played on their country.

 

Well, if the DNC and Democrat lawmakers were willing to hire a Pakistani Intelligence undercover crime family to handle their IT, clearly do not have an Islamophobic bone in their collective bodies!

Pretty excited about the upcoming Dem House and DNC red wedding episode

 

He's saying that irrespective of the crime, any pursuit of a Muslim is racist. Which suggests Muslims cannot commit crimes, moreorless by definition.

Maybe it's in the Koran.

 

More likely something like: "Oh ****, they're onto us. Quick! Call em racists! Maybe that'll throw them off long enough for us to come up with a plan."

 

It sounds like a fleeting condition, like "working while drunk".

Obviously it's just incompetent phrasing by an illiterate who's managed to carve out a career representing Pakistani crooks. I'll bet there's a lot to choose from.

 

Mark Steyn is right ... all of the illegalities the Democrats have alleged with Trump are there is spades with Debbie. It's right under their noses. Where is the special prosecutor?

 

And I think that's important. Clearly Mule-Faced Mueller has enough on his plate, so set firm parameters for him so that his investigation doesn't interfere with the 2nd Special Prosecutor that looks into the rest.


That’s Weird. Wasserman Schultz Paid Imran Awan for 5 Mos. After He Was Banned from House Computers

 

Wasserman Schultz Planned to Pay Imran Awan Even While He Lived in Pakistan

.
Debbie Does Dulles:
Awan booked a round-trip ticket to Pakistan in July and planned to depart Monday, July 24 with a return ticket in six months. He was arrested at Dulles Airport during his attempt to leave.

The Associated Press reported that Awan’s lawyer, Chris Gowen, said Awan “had informed the House of his plans to visit his family.”

Wasserman Schultz’s spokesman cited Awan’s Monday arrest as the reason for ending his employment on Tuesday: “Upon learning of his arrest, he was terminated.”

The office’s insistence that his termination was prompted by the Monday arrest — and not the House Sergeant at Arms banning him and his wife from touching congressional computers or his six months in Pakistan — suggests that had he boarded the flight without incident he would still be on payroll.

“Does that mean if he had boarded the flight as planned the office would have been paying him for six months while he was abroad?” TheDCNF investgative group asked Wasserman Schultz’s spokesman Thursday. “Why would it do that?” The spokesman did not respond.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/29/w...-pay-suspect-even-while-he-lived-in-pakistan/

Why was Wasserman Schultz so loyal to Awan family?
Why would she continue to pay a man who is no longer providing a service?
Why were they paid over $4 million dollars over the course of their employment even though they were accused of a cyber-security breach?

One main reason is because THEY KNOW that the DNC wasn’t hacked by the Russians. These IT staffers have all the dirt on the underbelly of DNC.

How long until Imran Awan flips on Wasserman Schultz and begins to sing like a canary?

 

THE DEMOCRATS’ PAKISTANI IT SCANDAL:

Asking no more questions, the credit union wired the money . . . to Pakistan. As you let all that sink in, consider this: Awan and his family cabal of fraudsters had access for years to the e-mails and other electronic files of members of the House’s Intelligence and Foreign Affairs Committees. It turns out they were accessing members’ computers without their knowledge, transferring files to remote servers, and stealing computer equipment — including hard drives that Awan & Co. smashed to bits of bytes before making tracks. . . .

Why were they paid so much for doing so little? Intriguing as it is, that’s a side issue. A more pressing question is: Why were they given access to highly sensitive government information? Ordinarily, that requires a security clearance, awarded only after a background check that peruses ties to foreign countries, associations with unsavory characters, and vulnerability to blackmail. These characters could not possibly have qualified. Never mind access; it’s hard to fathom how they retained their jobs.

The family controlled several properties, was involved in various suspicious mortgage transfers. Abid Awan, while working “full-time” in Congress, ran a curious auto-retail business called “Cars International A” (yes, CIA), through which he was accused of stealing money and merchandise. In 2012, he discharged debts in bankruptcy (while scheming to keep his real-estate holdings). Congressional Democrats hired Abid despite his drunk-driving conviction a month before he started at the House, and they retained him despite his public-drunkenness arrest a month after. Beyond that, he and Imran both committed sundry vehicular offenses. In civil lawsuits, they are accused of life-insurance fraud.

Democrats now say that any access to sensitive information was “unauthorized.” But how hard could it have been to get “unauthorized” access when House Intelligence Committee Dems wanted their staffers to have unbounded access? In 2016, they wrote a letter to an appropriations subcommittee seeking funding so their staffers could obtain “Top Secret — Sensitive Compartmented Information” clearances. TS/SCI is the highest-level security classification. Awan family members were working for a number of the letter’s signatories. Democratic members, of course, would not make such a request without coordination with leadership. Did I mention that the ranking member on the appropriations subcommittee to whom the letter was addressed was Debbie Wasserman Schultz?

This stinks to high heaven.

 

Wasserman Schultz Aide In Pakistan Still Liquidating Assets In US.

Imran Awan, a congressional aide arrested by the FBI after wiring $300,000 to Pakistan and misrepresenting the purpose, had previously wired money to the Muslim country and was frantically liquidating multiple real estate properties on the day he was arrested.

Imran’s real estate properties provide a source of money that could be sent directly to Pakistan when two upcoming home sales close. Prosecutors have since filed paperwork saying they fear “the dissipation of the proceeds of the fraud and destruction of evidence in other locations.”

Imran was arrested July 24 — four months after the FBI says his wife Hina Alvi moved to Pakistan after learning the family was the subject of a criminal investigation into their work as IT administrators for House Democrats. On the day of Imran’s arrest, the couple accepted a buyer for one house owned by Hina with an asking price of $618,000 (Hawkshead Dr.) and listed another property for sale at $200,000 (Pembrook Village), real estate records show.

On June 20, a third house his wife owned was “sold” to his brother-in-law for $360,000 (Sprayer St.). In November 2016, a fourth home his wife owned was “sold” to his brother Jamal for $620,000 (Linnett Hill Dr.). In both cases, the bank financed nearly all of the purchase.

Home sales could be a vehicle to continue moving large amounts of money to Pakistan even after Imran’s arrest. Authorities released him with a GPS monitor and confiscated his passport.

The whole thing reeks.

 

Have you asked President Trump or Attorney General Sessions? It sounds like you have a serious bone to pick with them.

 

Poodle Schultz needs to retire. Noone likes her in either party.

 

Could you imagine that?

She will cry her eyes out.