Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Scientists Get Buried In Snow At Davos While Lecturing On Global Warming

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Josephwalker, Jan 23, 2018.

Page 2 of 13
  1. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, one can be forecast somewhat accurately for about 3 days out and the other is magic with the ability to forecast to 2100!
     
    Hoosier8, Jan 23, 2018
    #26
    AlifQadr and Thirty6BelowZero like this.
  2. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said: ↑
    Good GAWD! Yet another one who has no scientific knowledge of weather and thinks that "global warming" means it won't ever snow again....


    I guess you never saw an ice cube melt....:roll::roll::roflol:



    I KNOW I don't have to...... I stand behind every word of my post which you didn't refute in any way....in fact your kneejerk post has nothing to do with my post..
     
    FoxHastings, Jan 23, 2018
    #27
    Zhivago likes this.
  3. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said: ↑
    Good GAWD! Yet another one who has no scientific knowledge of weather and thinks that "global warming" means it won't ever snow again....


    I guess you never saw an ice cube melt....:roll::roll::roflol:





    That has nothing to do with my post which stands firm....
     
    FoxHastings, Jan 23, 2018
    #28
    Zhivago and VanCleef like this.
  4. VanCleef

    VanCleef Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    3,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Jesus this thread is cringe.

    "Science is wrong cause of my political affiliation!"
     
    VanCleef, Jan 23, 2018
    #29
    The Bear, Zhivago and FoxHastings like this.
  5. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what was CO2 ppm back then?
     
    Ronstar, Jan 23, 2018
    #30
  6. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The biggest blunder of the Gore crowd was calling climate change, "Global Warming". It gave the really stupid people the excuse to make really ignorant conclusions about a snowy day.
     
    Daniel Light, Jan 23, 2018
    #31
    Saganist, The Bear and FreshAir like this.
  7. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    agreed
     
    Ronstar, Jan 23, 2018
    #32
  8. _Inquisitor_

    _Inquisitor_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,542
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    FYI:

    The scientific term climate was introduced by Russian scientist Vladimir Koeppin.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Köppen_climate_classification

    “Climate is the long-term pattern of weather in a particular area.

    Different parts of the world have different climates.

    Climate is determined by a region’s climate system. A climate system has five major components: the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, the cryosphere, the land surface, and the biosphere…

    Climate features also include windiness, humidity, cloud cover, atmospheric pressure, and fogginess. ”

    https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/climate/

    As one can see in science there is no such thing as global climate or earth climate, it is totally fake term, climate is strictly regional.

    As one can see that climate is NOT determined by temperature.

    I can also inform the warming is not measured is units of temperature.

    Fake science, no definitions, fake terms, GW/CC is insanity in each and every move and turn.
     
    _Inquisitor_, Jan 23, 2018
    #33
    ocean515, Josephwalker and Your Best Friend like this.
  9. VanCleef

    VanCleef Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    3,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would need major citation that an entire scientific field is fake.
     
    VanCleef, Jan 23, 2018
    #34
    Zhivago likes this.
  10. _Inquisitor_

    _Inquisitor_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,542
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Usually corrections are made in no less than 30 years: http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-global-warming.524457/page-2#post-1068585733

    None of the climates has been showing any noticable signs of change when The International Panel on Climate Change was formed.

    GW/CC is nothing but ignorance, obscurantism, insanity, there is not a bit of rationality or reality in it.
     
    _Inquisitor_, Jan 23, 2018
    #35
    vman12 likes this.
  11. _Inquisitor_

    _Inquisitor_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,542
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Many fields of science are fake, but I would need you to read my links, quotes words about this one and make an objection if any.

    I am live on the air.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2018
    _Inquisitor_, Jan 23, 2018
    #36
  12. VanCleef

    VanCleef Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    3,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your words need massive citation, as they are incredible claims.
     
    VanCleef, Jan 23, 2018
    #37
    Zhivago likes this.
  13. _Inquisitor_

    _Inquisitor_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,542
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2018
    _Inquisitor_, Jan 23, 2018
    #38
    guavaball likes this.
  14. VanCleef

    VanCleef Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    3,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    VanCleef, Jan 23, 2018
    #39
    Zhivago likes this.
  15. _Inquisitor_

    _Inquisitor_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,542
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    If the real science with over a hundred years of practical application which invented the term climate says one thing http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-global-warming.524457/page-2#post-1068585733 and 100% of climate scientists, HASA, HOAA, NAS, IPCC and 234 academies of science say totally different thing then feel free to think that the latter are not doing fake science.

    Insanity is not punishable by the law, it is already the harshest punishment.

    As I said Read, understand if you can, make objections if any, or feel free to keep on existing in the state of denial of the simple reality which is in front of your eyes.

    http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-global-warming.524457/page-2#post-1068585733
     
    _Inquisitor_, Jan 23, 2018
    #40
    drluggit likes this.
  16. Labouroflove

    Labouroflove Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    12,838
    Likes Received:
    6,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Political concensus isn't science, it's the opposite.
     
    Labouroflove, Jan 23, 2018
    #41
  17. VanCleef

    VanCleef Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    3,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The scientific consensus. And scientist consensus.

    This means a majority of the data and studies.

    Not politics.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2018
    VanCleef, Jan 23, 2018
    #42
    Zhivago likes this.
  18. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,072
    Likes Received:
    10,580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok, fun. I want to play!

    What happened before the previous ice age.
     
    jcarlilesiu, Jan 23, 2018
    #43
  19. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,072
    Likes Received:
    10,580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Our climate has been changing since before cave men discovered fire.
     
    jcarlilesiu, Jan 23, 2018
    #44
  20. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,072
    Likes Received:
    10,580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Science is wrong because it's manipulated FOR a political agenda.
     
    jcarlilesiu, Jan 23, 2018
    #45
  21. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,485
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And?

    Awful logic on your part., your awful logic being "climate changed naturally before, therefore humans can't change climate."

    That's every bit as stupid as saying "Forest fires occurred naturally before, so humans can't cause forest fires".

    No, _your_ cult pseudoscience is wrong for that reason. Your denier side is the only group proudly faking things due to their politics, so if you stop doing it, the problem ends.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2018
    mamooth, Jan 23, 2018
    #46
    The Bear and Zhivago like this.
  22. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28,072
    Likes Received:
    10,580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope. That's you inferring.

    Rather, it's "climate changed naturally before, so proof that humans are now contributing has only been 'proven' by manipulating the data."

    You are attempting to phrase my perspective as it allows you top argue against it.


    Uh... why do the climate models that "prove" man made global warming consistently only consider data into history for a certain duration, then stop?
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2018
    jcarlilesiu, Jan 23, 2018
    #47
  23. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,301
    Likes Received:
    31,359
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And forest fires existed before man can along. Doesn't mean man never causes forest fires.
     
    yardmeat, Jan 23, 2018
    #48
    Zhivago likes this.
  24. _Inquisitor_

    _Inquisitor_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,542
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    No working theory of natural sciences, no written law of natural sciences, none of the invention we use ever needed or used scientific consensus.

    It has never been a part of the scientific methods, rules of natural sciences.

    Appeal to scientific consensus and/or to a majority is a proof of pseudoscience.
     
    _Inquisitor_, Jan 23, 2018
    #49
    AlifQadr and Labouroflove like this.
  25. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,485
    Likes Received:
    2,217
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, that's a conspiracy theory on your part, one unsupported by any evidence.

    Where do you get such nonsense?

    First, the models do no such things.

    Second, the directly measured evidence proves man-made global warming, not models. The stratospheric cooling, the increase in backradiation and the decrease in outgoing longwave in the GHG bands are all smoking guns for a human cause. There are no "natural cycles" explanations for those directly observed things, hence the "It's a natural cycle!" theory is wrong. Models have nothing to do with those direct observations.
     
    mamooth, Jan 23, 2018
    #50
    Zhivago likes this.
Page 2 of 13

Share This Page