Trump should concede now.

Why? So the urban shitholes get to tell the rest of the country what to do? Thank the Sovereign God of Creation, Jesus Christ that our Founding Fathers were wise to institute the Electoral College. This way, it keeps the urban sewers on a tight leash.

 

No reports of ballots with missing barcodes or watermarks. No reports of stolen ballots from citizens out of their mailboxes. No instances of non existed voters on ballots. No evidence that any county had 130% voter turnout.

 

No, 100% of Trump's pending cases involve sufficient fraudulent votes and there are only a few counties in a few states involved. You should stick with "SCOTUS is unlikely to decide in Trump's favor on the merits" which would be a legally and factually correct statement as opposed to the above fabrication.

 

You aren't aware that many of the cases thrown out were thrown out by Trump appointed judges?

 

There were exactly -0- forensic audits in any of the counties in question. Some audits of some voting machines were ordered, yet not completed to date. Not the same as a ballot audit. Calling a mere recount an audit fools no one who knows the difference, so of course the MSM and the fraudsters did exactly that, relied on the electorate not knowing the difference.

 

Reread what I wrote. YOu missed a vital word.

 

Georgia did an audit and found no wrong doing. The machines matched the paper printout receipt and no votes were switched.

 

I missed nothing, and stick with my post exactly as it stands. You posted a ridiculous fabrication when you could have simply posted a statement of the truth that still comports with your opinion. You did not.

 

He can certainly investigate.
But he was trying to bribe a foreign gov't. With a shadow gov't. Guiliai had no official gov't role to investigate on behalf of the USA.

 

No, Georgia did -not- do an "audit" of any county's ballots. They used the term "audit" but no audit was conducted. Words have meanings, audit has a relatively clear one. Already dealt with the difference between a machine audit and a ballot audit.

FYI, an audit occurs when all the ballots in a jurisdiction, county, precinct, ward, etc. are matched with lawful voters on the voting rolls, and also against all the other procedural and substantive state laws with respect to balloting and voting were observed, proper matched signatures on mailed ballots for one of many examples.

Again, no audits were conducted in any of the suspect counties. In every county where they were requested they were resisted furiously OR nonaudits equating to mere recounts were conducted and wrongfully claimed as audits.

 

Odd thing about this thread, is you keep giving your personal opinion. Making you, and your opinion, the topic of some posts.

Post evidence so evidence can be the subject. Instead of your personal opinion.

 

Yes you did. I asked for serious pending cases. You forgot that 'serious' part. We have already seen 52 of the other kinds. You have absolutely nothing and that is why regardless of jurisdiction, subject or court, your allies lost.

 

Ballot recounts is part of an audit. In Georgia they checked the integrity of the machines by ensuring the paper receipts matched up with the machine tally. This is a type of audit.

 

Logic simply won't work on some.
Especially on the likes of trump.

 

Simply stating there's faked ballots capable of changing the election outcome, is nothing but conspiracy thinking.

 

No audits, within any reasonable accounting or legal definition of the word, were conducted in any of the suspect counties. None. You can call a mere recount of stacks of fraudulent ballots an "audit," or call a banana or grapefruit "audits" all you like and be factually wrong. Up to you.

 

There is nothing illegal with mail in ballots and voting.
Are you just upset that voting was made to accomodate voters in a world wide pandemic?
I think mail in voting ought to be how most voting takes place in the future.

 

I didn't forget anything. "Serious" has no legal meaning whatsoever. Both strains of the Trump cases are as "serious" as any other case, the Constitutional strand was not dismissed with prejudice and the fraud strand has yet to even go to SCOTUS. You remain out of your depth and should have taken my earlier advice about a reasonable claim of facts.

 

It was done. It's called canvassing. It's done in every state following an election.

 

Yes, Biden was trying to bribe a foreign government... with my tax dollars... to quash an investigation into his lowlife dirtbag hooker-beating kid porn cokehead administratively-discharged kid's gravy train.

 

My opinion -- and by extension yours -- *IS* the topic of this thread. YOU -- and by extension ME -- are not.

 

I am not the one out of my depth here. You still have provided no case from any court, in any state, in any appelate jurisdiction that you can point to as your legal star child that leads to the decertification of several states full of electors, sufficient to overturn this election. The term does not need to be in a law dictionary to have significant and discernable meaning to attorneys, judges, and law professors can distinguish between a serious claim in a brief or courtroom and one that is a waste of time. My Dad ( a law professor) used to talk about the giggle test and the laugh test when he was discussing just these less than serious suits , claims, and arguments you are hitching your ambivalent wagon to.. We will pick a synonym you will find. There are no colorable claims in any federal court based on fraud or constitutionality left to litigate based on fraud or constitutionality that any court officer with three legal synapses won't role their eyes at. . If I am wrong, I am sure you can prove 'your league' by citing the case or cases that will wind their way to a serious hearing in front of the full SCOTUS court.

Don't use words like 'fraud' or 'constitutionality'. That is what people out of their league do. Just cut to the chase. These cases are already in the works, winding up the ladder. Name the cases with a colorable claim and sufficient breadth of scope to get the job done.

 

I see. You think Biden got impeached?

 

He doesn't have to concede or say anything. I wish he would simple issue a simple statement saying he accepts the results of the EC. After the way he was treated by the Dems/Left/MSM beginning before he was even elected up until this very day and how it will continue can't blame him if he says nothing. As FOX has been showing even up to recent times the Dems especially Hillary say he is an illegitimated President so why should he issue a concessionary statement?

Here go search YouTube for Dems call Trump Iligetimate and you will get this list, just go watch them and get back to me about how concessionary they were.

 

What's good for the goose is good for that gander isn't it? And the Reps are just getting started. And there is already a criminal investigation into the Biden family and he's not even sworn in yet.