ASU Students Slander Rittenhouse En Masse, Demand Disenrollment.

Kids these days.

Lies on top of lies on top of lies about this citizen who was not guilty of anything except being a dumb kid. These gaslighting blowhards (calling themselves "Students for Socialism") called K.R.'s attackers "innocent" and have stated they do not want a "murderer" on their campus.

Grow up, kiddies.

Arizona university students demand administration to 'withdraw' Kyle Rittenhouse: 'killer off our campus' (msn.com)

Looks like Kyle has some more defendants to add to his defamation lawsuits.

 

Kyle is undoubtedly enjoying a lot of adulation from trump and his minions but he is quickly learning that there is a majority of our population that doesn't want to have a thing to do with him.

 

That is their right. However, they ought to be truthful. Calling him a murderer is not suppoted by the facts, for example. If his conduct has not violated the student code of conduct, then these kids are idiots for their demands that he be expelled from the school.

 

What is untruthful about the 'opinion' that an extremely biased judge could easily had an impact on the decision reached by the jury.

 

Of course. All the hateful left that believe all the lies they were told.

 

Didn’t happen. The judge gave the prosecution so much leeway that they hung themselves. The trail should have been over when the prosecution violated Kyles constitutional rights numerous times.

The jury saw the facts unlike apparently most of the haters. Public opinion is certainly divided between those that watched the trial and those that didn’t but the law is never important for the left, only feelings are.

 

The woke mob is never satisfied. He was found not guilty by a jury of his peers. Deal with it...

 

They are entitled to their own opinions. They are not entitled to their own facts, however. The facts are as clear as they can be: K.R. broke no laws.

These immature little twits just want mob justice.

 

Objectively, this case never should have even been prosecuted.

 

True.

 

I support their right of free speech. I wouldn't want him to walk into my class brandishing his AR15, or maybe concealed carrying either. Who knows, he may feel he has to "protect" himself from those bad lefties on campus.

Of course, most likely, the campus is a gun-free zone. I wonder why the pro 2nd amendment crowd doesn't just boycott universities, in protest.

 

I don't think I stated otherwise. And I am using my free speech to state these effete little shits are full of ****. Also, freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences. The statements calling him a murderer and implying he's a white supremacist are defamatory prima facia in the absence of any evidence to support these claims.

Pure folly: The ASU campus is already a gun-free zone. Tilting at windmills. Not to mention, he would not be legally-able to conceal carry in AZ until he turns 21.

Sadly, given the thug mentality of the woke mobs, he is probably going to be facing various threats from these unhinged sycophants for some time to come.

It is a gun-free zone. Which of course just means the only people carrying guns on the campus outside of the authorized agents of the state are those who disregard the law. It has been proven that K.R. is not one of those individuals.

 

He also wasn't legally allowed to buy an AR15 in Wisconsin at the age of 17. Yet, he obtained one anyway through a straw purchase. So, how do we know that he won't disregard the AZ conceal carry age limit either?

 

Another case of not knowing anything about the trial.

 

did they call him a "Killer' or 'Murderer'?

the article is not clear.... calling him a murderer now would be wrong, same as calling OJ a murderer would be wrong...

 

looks like he upset QAnon

"Followers of the QAnon movement are lashing out at Kyle Rittenhouse for his comments on lawyer Lin Wood"

https://www.insider.com/followers-of-qanon-movement-are-lashing-out-at-kyle-rittenhouse-2021-11

"Another Telegram user on Watkins' channel with the ID And1THEONE went so far as to accuse Rittenhouse of being a child from the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, a common conspiracy theory in the QAnon-verse that posits that the shooting was a hoax."

 

Laughable nonsense failure to allow the prosecution to taint the jury pool before hand is scarcely a sign of bias. I wish the judges on the case of most of the 1/6 rioters were as scrupulous.

 

As would calling him a killer be wrong. He was found not guilty because of self defense.

ASU could be sued big time, if they disenrolled him. If they don't want to belong to the same university, then they can resign and go elsewhere. I am sure there are a large number of left leaning universities such as Berkley, who would be happy to have them. Might even give them a big scholarship.

 

So you think that the groups "Students for Socialism, Students for Justice in Palestine, Multicultural Solidarity Coalition, and MECHA de ASUStudent" represent the majority? Hmmm.

I would not bet on that notion.

 

Funny that's the one "crime" he wasn't charged with. Because it wasn't a crime. Because he didn't purchase the rifle and was in full legal possession of it on the night in question. The only person in this scenario who we know was illegally carrying a firearm that night is prohibited possessor and Rittenhouse attacker Gaige Grosskreutz - who as of this writing has not yet been charged for the two felonies he committed over the course of his encounter with K.R.

We don't. But that argument applies to every single person in the state of Arizona, and every single person who steps on that campus.

 

Please try to stay on topic.

 

I said nothing like that but why am I not surprised?

 

Are you joking? Here, I made it nice and big so you can see it.

"Even with a not-guilty verdict from a flawed ‘justice’ system - Kyle Rittenhouse is still guilty to his victims and the families of those victims," the demand letter states. "Join us to demand from ASU that those demands be met to protect students from a violent blood-thirsty murderer."​

To rational people, yes.

Not entirely analogous as we have clear video evidence of the K.R. events and no such evidence in the murders of Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ron Goldman. But it is true that Mr. Simpson was acquitted so it would be incorrect to call him a murderer.

 

He was acquitted - the ASU students are dead wrong in their demands.

They don't need to be friends with him, but he has every right to go to the school without issue

 

This is a thread that is discussing the outrage from those groups.

If your conclusion of "majority" is not based on the OP to which you replied, then on what basis are you concluding it to be the "majority"?

If you had said "a lot" that would have been a logical statement, but the word majority is rather specific, and to ask you where you get that specific conclusion is certainly fair game. To assume you were referring to the OP is also a reasonable inference.