Trump's WHITE HOUSE CALL LOGS SHOW 7-HR. GAP ON JAN. 6th

Oh Jesus, don't ask... because then he'll answer and we'll be more confused....

He seems to be in full spam mode today....

 

LOL... indignant ignorance, who could ask for more??

 

Hillary was not charged with, or fined for, "treason."
There is a difference-- since you apparently don't recognize this-- between a finable offense, and a criminal offense/something worthy of impeachment.

It seems like a strawman argument, you are making, cross- bred with points of whataboutism. Your argument, then, is what? You feel that Hillary broke some rules, therefore anything Trump did, is fine by you?

Really brilliant attitude.

 

You don't sound credible because that's not how things work. If what you are claiming was even remotely true NO head honcho in any field would ever be brought up on charges for anything because almost ALWAYS someone else did the actual **thing** that was unethical and illegal. He is still responsible because all his staff work for him.

Do you honestly think that Martha Stewart, herself, literally did her own stock transactions?

I'm not clutching any pearls. I'm calling you out for not having a clue what you're talking about. And, you are apologizing just like the idiots that shrug off what he did that lead to 5 Capitol police officers dying and hundreds injured. Just because he didn't say "go beat the hell out of cops for hours and threaten my VP based on the lie I told you" while he sat for hours and did nothing. So much for the "law and order president".

It's funny how he has decades of unethical, illegal and fraudulent cases in which he was found liable and you people still give him a pass on anything. In other words, you're part of the problem.

 

Much better done than what I was thinking about going with...

Somedays, they put the laser pointer on FULL RANDOM mode....

 

Drluggit, making claims that he can't even explain-- what else is new?
Oh yes, it's just like a Democrat, to expect you to actually state the meaning of your obscure words.

 

I only respond to this particular post because it has Matt Gaetz in it.... Are you aware that for one, brief, uncomfortable moment, you and he (and me) are likely in agreement on a topic? Party Boy was one of only 3 R's to vote to decriminalize MJ yesterday...

Makes me a little squishy... thank goodness there were only 3 of em, or I might have to reconsider...

 

Nope. Not yet. That would actually require someone to charge her for it, huh... How likely do you suppose that is with Biden in office?

 

About the same as with T**** in office before him....

 

Media’s ‘7-hour Gap’ Story in White House Logs Turns Out to Be Hoax: CNN

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media...in-white-house-logs-turns-out-to-be-hoax-cnn/

 

Touché!

 

Your ringing condemnation of the liberal DOJ folks duly noted...

 

That is still not an argument, as to the topic of this thread. BTW, the explanation as to why Trump's calls were not recorded in the Call Log-- because Trump used cellphones-- is not the end of this issue. The calls were supposed to, still, be recorded in the Presidential Daily Diary:

[Snip]

Calls also should have been documented in the Presidential Daily Diary, which is compiled by an Archives employee detailed to the White House. While it’s supposed to include “impromptu moments such as staff member drop-ins and telephone calls,” the diarist’s account is only as good as the information he or she receives from the President’s staff.

The former Obama staffer also acknowledged this process was more of an honor system and dependent on how meticulous aides serving in other administrations were or what instructions they were given.

No explanation has been given so far why calls known to have been made in the hours Trump was in the Oval Office are not documented in the presidential diary.

[End]

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/31/poli...trump-jan-6-white-house-phone-logs/index.html


The main reason this is important, just so you don't get lost, is so that the Jan. 6 Committee will be able to interview everyone Trump spoke to, just before, during, and after the attack on the Capitol. This just means, as I'd said in the OP, that the Committee will have to subpoena the phone records, of all Trump's aides who were there (since Trump was known to use others' phones), as well as Trump's own phone records. I only hope that an absence of any record in the Daily Diary, will help facilitate, and expedite, the Committee's subpoenaed requests, for these phone records.

 

never said they did, they impeached him for lying about a consensual affair

 

he lied about a consensual affair, that is what I said

 

The former Obama staffer also acknowledged this process was more of an honor system and dependent on how meticulous aides serving in other administrations were or what instructions they were given.

Perhaps you missed this in your rush to underline one part of what you quoted..

Any time i can help just ask ok?

 

Which state, Democrat or Republican?

 

So it's your supposition that you can convict someone on the basis of "come on"? My, what a stirring legal analysis.
If they direct the thing to be done that's illegal and that's what you're going to have to prove with cheeto dick. Rules are rules.
You're not responsible for the torts and crimes of others, this is a bedrock deep principle of American Jurisprudence.
Where do you have a license to practise law out of friend?

No, but she DIRECTED those transactions and received insider information, which is what was proven BARD at her trial prior to a conviction being possible. See how that works dear? First evidence the person you're charging actually committed a crime, THEN guilt, THEN punishment.

I'm not apologizing, I'm pointing out there are rules of evidence and elements to the statute you haven't proven. This is not 'Nam Smokey, this is bowling. There are rules.

Anyone who believed cheeto dick was going to be 'the law and order president' doesn't have two functional braincells to rub together for warmth. Go lob that **** at Trump voters, I voted 3rd party so you can all continue to snipe at each other while I continue to enjoy my popcorn.

 

Like trump did with the 2018 and 2020 elections? I mean it only seems fair to return the favor lol

 

As likely as it was with trump in office for 4 years lol

 

I read that-- I think you misread it. IOW, there was little, if any, enforcement; that is not the same as saying that it was, or is, meant to be optional. It still was supposed to be done. But if no one had any reason to suspect that it wasn't, in some cases, there would be no likelihood of any follow up: in other words, what nobody knows, won't hurt them (and these omissions, I am sure, generally resulted from hectic schedules, and a negligence, born of exhaustion).

But in this situation, the omissions are not a case of "and none will be the wiser." Can you follow that, scholar?