Most terrifying poll result I've ever seen

And out come the dick pics...

Absolutely no one has changed their vote over the last 4 years because of HB's penis shots.

 

Poll isn't about "leftists"

MOD NOTE: Why is the term "leftist" OK while the term "MAGAT" is considered an insult?

It is about the rich.
AND
For the most part the rich are not "conservative" or "liberal" but simply rich and their ideology is getting more.

You should learn the difference.

 

Republicans already cheated and Stole the SC

 

Do you have a short memory of the events that transpired on his inauguration day in Washington DC?

You don't get to have so many elected Democrats calling him an illegitimate president and then they get to whine when he says the same thing they did

 

Please illuminate me.

How many police officers were killed and injured?
How many were arrested?

False equivalences are false, not equivalent.

 

You mean the protests where no one got killed and they never even tried to storm the white house like the capital.

 

more nonsense, and I don't expect you to stop.

 

Never mind all this bull **** lawfare is slowly collapsing.

 

There's just no talking with you people.

Ok, I take it all back again. So we're back to:

Sure he did. That’s what he has done for his whole miserable life: cheated.

Cheated for money, cheated for power.
Trump's a con man. That’s all.

 

I'd laugh at such willingness to believe obvious BS but it is just too sad.

 

I didn't get the number; it's what Rasmussen reported it looked at in the analysis of data.

 

character /kăr′ək-tər/
noun

1. The combination of mental characteristics and behavior that distinguishes a person or group. synonym: disposition.
   Similar: disposition
2. The distinguishing nature of something. synonym: quality.
   Similar: quality
3. Moral strength; integrity.

I was refering to #3, when I said tRaitor tRump has zero but, I could go along with you and, "many others", if you're suggesting he has a negative amount.

integrity /ĭn-tĕg′rĭ-tē/
noun

1. Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code.
2. The state of being unimpaired; soundness.
3. The quality or condition of being whole or undivided; completeness.
   

Again, unless you're considering negative values, I'll stick by my first impression and, there are many others that agree.

I'm not even going to look up honesty. TRaitor tRump lies when the truth would serve him better and, he's been proven in courts of law to be pathologically fraudulent time after time ... after time. He's indicted 91 times, mostly, for felonious fraud and deception. Which pretty much covers all three, character, integrity and honesty; his lack thereof.

 

This guy Rasmussen should maybe do some homework. The article starts out with bad information and like most other times reading biased articles ,they are bad information from start to finish

if they can’t not even do enough homework to verify things like the percentage of people earning over $150k and what is the income of the top 1% , then why bother reading past that?? Most likely it is all a lie

 

You make the assumption that what you want to believe is right because you want to believe it. This is not a solution, it's a problem- that nobody can help you with.

You are saying you see nothing wrong with the conduct of the people you want to believe, and everything wrong with those who oppose them.
To me- this is the little kid covered in pink fingerpaints saying he has no idea why that same paint is on the walls, the furniture, or himself.
He hasn't yet learned the value of honesty, even with himself. YOU may believe that kid. Rational people know that would say that your mind and the kids... work on the same level.

You don't pretend to have rational discussions with that kid. He has no idea what that is.

 

And that little kid in your example would be the Orange Stain ? I see your point.

 

It says LIBERAL rich people don't mind rigging the system in their favor.

" The elite 1%—individuals who make over $150,000 a year, live in densely populated areas, and have postgraduate degrees—are overwhelmingly liberal."

 

Just because they failed doesn't mean they didn't try.

 

That a rich guy supports women's rights while his rich next door neighbor doesn't ignores the fact that both of them would rig the system to increase their wealth and power.

That you try to differentiate between rich liberal guys wanting power and the entire 2024 GOP is ...

LAUGHABLE

 

Everything the left doesn't agree with is a lie. Or misinformation. Or racist. Or white supremacist. Or terrorististic.
That's why they continue to screw up; they can't bring themselves to address facts they don't like about themselves.
They rush to challenge or discredit anything that reveals their ugly side, thinking that sufficient denial will make it not exist... and therefore not need to be faced.
The man who denies facts he doesn't like- is a fool. And the easiest person to fool.... is yourself.

The Rasmussen Polls are rated by fact-checkers as having High Reliability, the top rating.
Chances are- Rasmussen does their homework vastly more carefully than you or the average person.

And they aren't asking for your opinion, nor am I...it's just stating the results of a poll.
If you don't understand what you read... you are the only person who can improve that.

 

True- just as winning doesn't mean they didn't cheat.

 

I differentiate between winning power honestly and winning power by cheating. Sounds like you think they are the same thing.

The poll demonstrates quite clearly that certain groups among the wealthy are far more comfortable with cheating than others- and what identifies those groups.
It's not a surprise at all; only a confirmation of what has been obvious.

 

Many Americans are conditioned to support one side or the other of the uniparty. They don’t know of or even consider other options.

 

can you explain why we should ignore policies, judicial appointments etc and vote for Biden, who is mentally deficient, corrupt and senile over Trump

 

Yes, but claiming an election was rigged without substantiation over and over again makes the claim dubious.

 

Of course. It is the difference between stealing an election and merely attempting to so.