Trump is a bad person. Why would anybody vote for him?

Ex post facto law is prohibited in The United States.

 

So she said.

 

Here you go! It wasn't even in secret...

 

Massive appeal to sympathy fallacy.

 

Yeah! How dare we demand sympathy for children as they are being tortured by "The Orange Deity", right?

 

And the Judge later clarified that the finding meant rape, hence the rape recording in Congressional records.

 

Massive falsehood.

 

Still not a conviction.

 

Right over your head. Research "logically fallacies" and get back to us. here, let me help you. <--link

 

This is the same Trump who says stuff like this about his daughter?: He dignified Howard Stern's comments about Ivanka.

In an October 2006 interview, Stern remarks that Ivanka “looks more voluptuous than ever,” and asked if she had gotten breast implants. Trump is willing to engage in the discussion about his own daughter, telling Stern that she did not get implants.

In a later interview.

“By the way, your daughter,” says Stern.

“She’s beautiful,” responds Trump.

“Can I say this? A piece of ass,” Stern responds.

“Yeah,” says Trump.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/08/politics/trump-on-howard-stern/index.html

 

couldn't care less-we have a leftist judge proving he's biased. there was no conviction and the judge is a disgrace since he knew what the NY statute says. He's claiming that the NY definition (which Trump was never convicted of violating since this was a CIVIL court) WAS INSUFFICIENT and he was using a colloquial definition of rape that includes any penetration by any item-fingers, johnson's dildos, pencils, batons, bananas, etc

 

I don't know how this is so confusing to someone who most likely does have a law degree, albeit not in the USA.

 

Well right up until it gets over turned because the Judge wouldn't allow exculpatory evidence such as the fact that her story was lifted straight out of her favorite TV drama law and order.

 

You say that as though it is a revelation. It ain't, it is common ground, undisputed.

 

the fact is-Trump has not been convicted of anything as of today. That Judge should know better

 

Welcome to American politics.

 

Yes to all of the above but I have zero evidence that the Judge was a leftie or biased. It is written, the beneficiary*** of your enthusiastic ongoing support and very active defence is a rapist.

*Rapist
*Swindler
*Bordering on pathological

 

I’m gonna have to ask for a source on that because from what I’ve seen the vast majority of people who claim this don’t do it at all, in fact they’re just as guilty as anyone else is.

 

We are in violent agreement so I have no idea what burr is under your saddle.

 

Don’t know about that but there’s way too many dick headed Trump supporters out there that share way too many similarities.

 

Nothing I can prove, just observations that’s all. Your fellow forum members are perfect examples of it and it’s very apparent.

 

He's a CLINTON APPOINTEE

what has Trump done to cause this level of ire from someone who isn't even a US voter? did you know that if he was a private citizen he could sue you for defamation for calling him a rapist because that is defamation per se?

 

that makes no sense

 

How is that in any way 'exculpatory,' (assuming what you say is true?) Further, Humpty's*** Attorney was allowed to cross-examine her about that.

Link.

*Rapist
*Swindler
*Bordering on pathological

 

Then let me put it like this: your fellow forum members that are Trump supporters like him because all the provocative **** he says in public is what they’d love to say in public if they could get away with it.

He’s made people with less than appealing viewpoints more comfortable speaking their minds out loud.