“Significant Increase” in USDA Employees Viewing Porn on Govt. Computers During Work

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Professor Peabody, Mar 26, 2018.

  1. Nonsensei436

    Nonsensei436 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    960
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

    Anyone still talking about Bill Clinton's affair has forfeited any right to ever tell anyone else to get over anything.
     
  2. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    earning your user name I see.

    Anyone Ignoring Bill Clinton's numerous dalliances has forfeited any right to ever tell anyone anything about alleged affairs..
     
  3. Nonsensei436

    Nonsensei436 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    960
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Refusing to use any semblance of critical thinking you possess, I see.

    And I am not ignoring Bill Clinton's affairs. They're just utterly irrelevant to Trump's affairs. You're the one stuttering "b-but whut 'bout Bill n Monica??!?!?"

    Nobody cares anymore. Its not relevant anymore. You don't get to use it as a shield for Trump. He ****ing paid someone to keep quiet about his affairs which is just a step removed from paying them for sex, and you don't give the slightest **** about it after decades of hammering everyone else over the head with family values.

    We aren't EVER going to forget this. You guys are all a pack of transparent ****ing FRAUDS.
     
  4. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,317
    Likes Received:
    9,645
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nice dodge.
     
  5. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course his affairs are relevant unless you planned on banning Bill from the White House if Hillary had won. Do you have proof Bill would have been barred from the White House had Hillary won?
     
  6. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not a dodge, just a comparison to point out the hypocrisy on the left.
     
  7. superbadbrutha

    superbadbrutha Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    52,269
    Likes Received:
    6,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is what you have been told.
     
  8. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,317
    Likes Received:
    9,645
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What hypocrisy ?
     
  9. An Old Guy

    An Old Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2015
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    2,318
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump, government employees and porn - the buffoon is leading the way, LOL.
     
  10. Nonsensei436

    Nonsensei436 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    960
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This is the sort of comment that reminds me that, without a doubt, conservatives are so in their own world that they may very well be literally from another dimension.

    I have absolutely no idea what your logic here is. You’ve lost me utterly. I don’t understand the subject, train of thought, the path you took to the conclusion or the conclusion itself.

    Your thought process is so remarkably alien to me that I have no idea how to respond. If you had inserted the words waffle and spaceship randomly into your reply it would have made no less sense.

    Why would we ban Bill Clinton from the White House under any circumstances? What the **** are you talking about?
     
  11. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still too big, since that number includes justifiable ones.
     
    Professor Peabody likes this.
  12. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They're just trying to research Trump's latest girlfriend - after all, he is their boss, and it's good to keep up on the latest.
     
  13. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Uh...Trump's affairs from 18 years ago are relevant but Bill Clinton's aren't.
     
  14. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Try that for starters. If you supported Hillary, you supported putting that man back in the White House.

    If you did it would scare me to death.
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2018
    vman12 likes this.
  15. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Was the NDA illegal?
     
  16. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,317
    Likes Received:
    9,645
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please show me where I said that
     
  17. Nonsensei436

    Nonsensei436 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    960
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    First of all that story is from a rag. I can’t even find a corroborating story on Fox News.

    Second, Hillary Clinton would be the president not Bill. If you mean he would physically be back in the White House then yes you’re right, but who cares?

    I doubt even you understand your thought process. Just some glue and twine mixed in with “**** libs” and random smatterings of Clinton and Benghazi.
     
  18. Nonsensei436

    Nonsensei436 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    960
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hahahahahah so ****ing predictable. I make a post about the morals your ilk have just been exposed as only pretending to care about and you come back with a question about legality.

    Way to really drive my point home. ****ing frauds.
     
  19. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You didn't, but your fellow alt-left posters have.
     
  20. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you really think alt-left sources would carry the story?

    I do! I would only agree to the philanderer who soiled the Oval Office rug, being back in the White House if there was a written agreement that the Clinton's would be personally responsible for any of Bill's dalliances NOT we the people. You think that's going to happen?

    Delusional much?
     
  21. Nonsensei436

    Nonsensei436 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    960
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When you’re so bonkers you consider Fox News to be left.



    How would we be responsible to begin with? When the Lewinsky scandal broke, did our taxes go up or something and I missed it?

    Honestly I don’t know how you arrived at some of your ideas but it’s clear you aren’t thinking.

    No I’m sane. I only seem delusional to you because you’ve gone so far off the deep end you don’t even know which way is up anymore.
     
  22. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You said you couldn't find corroboration on Fox, so now you can?

    Alt-leftists never do.

    Your alt-leftness has blinded you to the truth.
     
    vman12 likes this.
  23. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LoL "morals".

    You lot tried to elect the most immoral woman alive.

    I love when you guys talk about "morals", the "Constitution" and "rule of law".

    Makes me laugh every time.

    You're not fooling anyone.
     
  24. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,317
    Likes Received:
    9,645
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't lump me in with them. My positions are pretty clear.
     
  25. Nonsensei436

    Nonsensei436 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    960
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Democrats weren’t the party screeching about family values for the last five decades. Now comes this blatant womanizer and adulterer which are probably the least of his moral failures and one of you give the slightest ****. You give him a total pass. Where’s your hyper focus on family values now? What happened to it?

    Any value you can shut off at will was fake to begin with. Like i said you’re ****ing frauds and now more than ever before, everyone knows it.
     

Share This Page