#1 reason I will be voting straight Republican

By "this policy" I'm assuming you mean the policy that those dressed as women use the women's and those dressed as men use the men's.

That is the way it has been for a very long time. I don't see any likelihood of a law that would improve on that.

What you seem to be asking for is for those assigned as female at birth, but who live as men to be using the women's bathroom dressed as men. And, vice versa for the men's. I'll have to tell you, I don't see that as better. The real bottom line is that you are quite unlikely to know the full story on someone's sexuality by a glance while washing your hands.

 

That's funny because nobody does that.


I'm sorry, you're probably a tranny fan.

 

But regardless of how they dress at the end of the day they're either male or female. And no amount of delusions, surgery or makeup will change that.

 

give me a break, me thinks your a conservative and always were

 

republicans in the bathrooms... we should make a law



.

 

Most people KNOW that bathroom issue is made up; it's a catalyst invented to propel other aspects of discriminatory Republican (anti-LGBT) legislation. That is all it is.

- - - Updated - - -

Amen to that!!

 

LOL! The same would apply anywhere a perp might to that. Groping a 10 year old is illegal everywhere. And all it would take for an arrest is for the 10 year old to report it to an adult.

These seems to be really hard for you.

 

False. If the guy says I didn't touch him, I was just in there peeing. You can't prove he did anything and you can't show that he was somewhere that he shouldn't be. As such you can't convict him in a court of law.

However if he's not allowed in the woman's bathroom then you CAN prove he was somewhere he shouldn't be and you CAN pass the criteria of "reasonable doubt".

 

Well, medical science disagrees with you on that, noting that human sexuality is actually more complex as it derives from a variety of factors that usually, but not always, work together.

I think the shocking part of all this is that some are finding out that when they follow a stranger into the bathroom they really don't know as much about that person as they thought they did. That is, the larger change is coming in the awareness, not in some rule change.

 

How do we tell the difference between a person carrying a firearm for their own protection and a mass shooter about to start killing people and just waiting for the right opportunity?

 

Medical science does not disagree with me. When someone believes they are something that their genetic code dictates that they are then they are, by definition, delusional.

Is the girl who identifies as a cat actually a cat just because she believes she is? Of course not. She's delusional. And so are transgenders.

 

one flaw to your logic, you want women that look like men to go to the womens room, so if that happens then what is to stop a man that looks like a man from doing the same

then all the guy has to do is say he is transgender women and walk right in...... doesn't even have to dress like a women first

I think we should not punish transgenders for the actions of heterosexual perverts

.

 

We require gun owners to get gun permits so that we can know who they are. Furthermore they're required to PROVE with legitimate paperwork that they are legal gun owners.

If you'd allow for us to have a registration for transgenders or even better make them be able to prove they're ACTUALLY transgender with a psychiatric diagnosis then you wouldn't have pushback on this issue.

But something tells me you won't say that's acceptable will you?

 

It might have something to do with the many cases of transgendered individuals being assaulted in bathrooms.

- - - Updated - - -

And you can tell on sight if a person is a permitted gun carrier?

 

only if the gun is concealed

wear the gun strapped to a leg and no permit needed

or even carry the gun strapped over your back, no permit needed, the NBP often do this

.

 

That's true however if he does something wrong then we can show he's NOT actually a transgender woman which would make it even more likely to get a conviction for his actions if he does something nefarious.

And we punish all men by keeping them segregated away from women's bathrooms based upon the actions of SOME heterosexual perverts.

Why haven't you been upset that we are punishing all males for the actions of a few heterosexual perverts?

- - - Updated - - -

No but if confronted the gun owner has to be able to prove he's a legal gun owner. But you won't require that for the trannies.

- - - Updated - - -

A gun permit is needed to purchase the handgun.

And I'd just like to point out that the gun owners haven't committed a crime and yet we punish them by requiring them to register or get a permit to even exercise their right to a firearm.

 

should we punish all preachers cause of the actions of some perverted preachers... maybe make a law that they can't be alone with children?

then if they are alone with them, we can arrest them on the spot

.

 

Do you live in America? In 90% of the country you do not need a permit to buy a gun and in places with open carry, you don't need a permit to open carry one.

So I ask again, how do we tell the difference between a person legally open carrying for their protection and a mass shooter waiting for the opportunity to start killing people?

 

You have absolutely no clue what you're talking about. If a 10 year tells a police officer that she was inappropriately touched/fondled/whatever by a man in a bathroom, that's PC and that's good enough for an arrest. And yes, it could easily go to trial on any number of different factors.

Oh, boy. Where'd you study law? Pep Boys?

 

If you can show a statistical over representation of priests that molest children then you might have an argument. As I said we as a society routinely punish large groups for the actions of a small subset of that group. But we qualify that by assessing the statistical over representation. If we can show that a group is vastly overrepresented in regards to a violent crime or child molestation or something of that nature then our society will lay consequences upon the entire group to dissuade the subset from engaging in the taboo activity.

But I think your claim is based more upon your personal bias than it is any actual statistical analysis.

- - - Updated - - -

But when it goes to trial the offender will get off unless you can do one of two things. Either you have to provide evidence that he did commit a crime. Or you have to prove that he was somewhere that he shouldn't have been.

If you can't do that you aren't going to win the vast majority of the time if all you have is their word against his.

And I don't really care what you think about my education. There is a plethora of evidence to back me up.

 

Are they the party of liars? And attracts similar/

 

Wow! You really have zero clue how trials/prosecutions work, do you?

No conviction is ever guaranteed; it depends a many different factors and the testimony of the assaulted child IS evidence. It's up to the jury to determine how reliable it .s

 

show how many fake transgenders have molested children in a bathroom, bet it's less then preachers molesting children in a church

.

 

No, I won't disappear. You tried to link target's bathroom policies to peeping tom incidents. Your comment...

1. your first link was from may 28, 2015 before the bathroom policies you accuse of causing this behavior.
2. Your second link is not even from Target, and oh look, it's from October 8, 2015. Also, before the Target bathroom policy change. You're 0 for 2.

You linked peeping Tom incidents, which happened before Target changed their policy and will continue to happen afterwards. They will happen independent of Target's bathroom policy because perverts exist, most of which are heterosexual white men.

Next time try searching for links that confirm your bigotry that are not so easy to disprove. You need to try harder.

So now that i've destroyed your premise, close minded and silly that it is, will you disappear?