9/11 The New Pearl Harbour

Discussion in '9/11' started by Cornergas, Sep 10, 2017.

  1. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    This documentary categorically shows how ridiculous the official account of 9/11 really is....there is more but this is good for starters...
     
  2. Just_a_Citizen

    Just_a_Citizen Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Messages:
    9,310
    Likes Received:
    4,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,390
    Likes Received:
    1,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dr. Leroy Hulsey has confirmed the lunacy of NIST's WTC7 "collapse" theory in scientific terms. If their WTC theory is not workable or trustworthy why should anyone accept their twin tower "collapse" theory as legitimate?
     
  4. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I watch this documentary every year to remind myself how ridiculous the official story is. Outstanding work by the filmmaker.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except it is not a documentary it is fictional entertainnment
     
    Margot2 likes this.
  6. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    To the mentally challenged it is probably like you say, but to people who have the brains and courage to analyze and question, it provides lots of answers to the unanswered questions about the 9/11 inside job.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  7. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It only speculates.

    It is fiction with no evidence.
     
  8. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Have you watched the whole thing? Be honest.
     
  9. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes and it only speculates it presents no evidence.
     
  10. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,687
    Likes Received:
    13,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your "documentary" is crap. Didn't you expect the towers to collapse? The planes cut their spines and fire did the rest. They fell down as opposed to over. I know you have heard of gravity.
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,390
    Likes Received:
    1,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is that all supposed to be serious? Expected to collapse? They fell down? Keep your day job Margot, science and comedy just aren't quite your forte.
     
    nastimarvasti likes this.
  12. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have never used any science at all and you have consistently ignored the fact that science crushes and destroys your every assertion and claim.

    Follow your own advice boy. Keep flipping burgers you are wholly unqualified at anything else
     
  13. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Actually, I specifically remember thinking on that day that the top portions might fail but not the entire structures. Gravity and fire alone don't destroy the remaining 80 floors of a steel structure in seconds.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  14. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    So you don't find it at least a little curious what was done with Minetta's testimony? Let alone the rest of it.
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Irrelevant as the video is fiction with no evidence like all twoofer delusions
     
  16. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,687
    Likes Received:
    13,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you knew anything at all about the design or the architect or the aluminum skin, you would also have expected it to fall (collapse) into its own footprint.
     
  17. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Not including an important piece of testimony in the report AND changing both the wording and timing of the events is irrelevant? I didn't ask about evidence. I asked if you thought it was curious what happened to Minetta's testimony.
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,390
    Likes Received:
    1,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok I'll bite, what is it about the design, the architect and/or the aluminum skin that would cause me or anyone to "expect it to fall (collapse)"? Are you saying the architect built it with the expectation that it would "fall (collapse)"? And is that true for all 3 towers? And why is it not the case for any of 40+ high rise steel frame towers that didn't "fall (collapse)" in their entirety before and after 9/11 despite some having infernos engulf the entire building, last much longer and even one that was hit multiple times by missiles but stood and is currently in use? And for bonus points, why didn't the North Tower "fall (collapse)" during the 1973 fire that encompassed at least 9 stories if it was designed with the expectation that it would "fall (collapse)"? Or these buildings?:

     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2017
    nastimarvasti likes this.
  19. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    A reminder too that all skyscrapers are built with airplanes in mind. It's why they have red, blinking lights on the roofs/antennas.
     
  20. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it is irrelevant.

    The evidence completely refutes and debunks the conspiracy foolishness displayed in your video.

    Even the details you are talking about are irrelevant and evidence of...........nothing
     
  21. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because that is an apples and oranges comparison.

    The 1973 fire was not started by a plane crash.


    Massive fail but you knew that.
     
  22. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Irrelevant or not, I'm still waiting for your answer. You're dodging.
     
  23. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    The fire in Building 7 was also not started by a plane crash and yet, here we are.
     
  24. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,390
    Likes Received:
    1,199
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It probably wasn't started by the debris either. There were 2 buildings immediately on either side of WTC7 and neither caught fire from the debris. But of course there was never any arson investigation as required by NFPA protocol.
     
    nastimarvasti likes this.
  25. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one said it was but it was a bigger fire and the building was badly damaged by debris.

    The point is that each building fire or collapse is different and asking idiotic questions like " why didn't this one fall the same way " merely shows a lack of intelligence.
     

Share This Page