Everything here: https://911speakout.org/wayne-coste/ It's always the same, up go the repeat claims, passed around, all the rebuttal is ignored! http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/9-11con-the-pentagon.598106/page-19#post-1074651381
That's from pages back! What irritates here, is that @undertheradar posts this deliberate cherry-picked and very deceptive observation about a CNN reporter. @cjnewson88 answered it completely in post #455, as did I in post #454 and then quoted it with @ user link in post #472! Now why have you avoided all the responses to that deceptive spin on the CNN reporter's statement?
Conspiracies happen all the time. What about the claim that Iraq had WMDs? If that wasn't a conspiracy to mislead the public in order to justify war then what was it? Where does that prove that whatever hit those poles was a Boeing 757?
What the hell! He's given links, he's given rebuttal - ignores the whole damn lot. A cluster **** error. But let's put it in to real perspective. Why didn't they just pretend to find WMDs or simply plant them? You going to pretend not to see that as well? Every video tackles one section of the no-planes lie. It's from big players in the so called "911 truth" movement! Are you really afraid to watch it? It's rather twisted to ask such a question when given something that does nothing BUT answer it! https://911speakout.org/wayne-coste/
A few things, Shinebox. Firstly, I was asking for a video which showed the wreckage of a Boeing 757 but you responded with this one which only talks about the downed light poles. Am I to conclude that no such video exits? See this photo which was taken soon after: Do you see anything resembling the wreckage of a Boeing 757, like the tail section, the fuselage, the wings, passenger seats and luggage? The 757 is not a small plane. IOW, most of the unidentified 'debris' seen in photos outside the building looks small enough to be carted away in a single garbage truck. Secondly, speaking of Lloyde England and his taxi, even he doubts a 757 hit the Pentagon: continues here: https://truthandshadows.com/2019/03/20/lloyde-englands-tall-pentagon-tale-part-1/ Part 2: continues here: https://truthandshadows.com/2019/04/28/coste-chandler-fraud-about-england-part-2/ Thirdly, see here for more on Coste and Chandler: continues here: https://truthandshadows.com/2018/09/04/cabal-props-up-pentagon-official-story/
Why is it, without fail, every time rebuttal is offered to a garbage conspiracy, the response is always ignored. Afraid to admit you were fooled by somebody lying to you? WHY DO YOU KEEP AVOIDING REPLIES! Instead of watching and learning, you choose instead to search out somebody else's "analysis" and automatically side with it! I love also that you seek to cast aspersions on MAJOR players in the 911 "truther" narrative and all because of the insane notion of no planes? That's a special kind of dedication!
Still waiting for someone to point out the wreckage of a Boeing 757 in this photo: The 757 is not a small plane. So where is the all the wreckage? Anyone? Or to put it another way, does anyone really believe Chandler's claim that,
Were you to spend time watching the videos, you wouldn't need to spam the same crap from 20 years ago. The plane went into a very strong wall. Google "smithereens". Stop wasting everyone's time with this old hogwash.
