Hussein asking Moscow to help him get a second term is infinitely more complicated than him simply tripping over his tongue. Admittedly, the story is new; nevertheless, Ive not seen a single article that pulls all of the pieces together. Ill try to tie together a few of the pieces by quoting from several different sources. I am posting the full article that I think is most germane. The betrayal began long before Hussein was born: Irrespective of the rosy picture Reuters paints it does answer the question What specifically was President Obama referring to . . .: Obama vows to pursue further nuclear cuts with Russia Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:15am GMT By Matt Spetalnick and Jeremy Laurence http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFBRE82P01020120326 Remember that Hussein got a Nobel Peace Prize for his touchy-feely rhetoric. The things hes done, namely getting the New START Treaty ratified, is more than the rhetoric of a demagogue. His betrayals justify his Nobel to the International community if not to Americans. Even if he is nothing more than a fool, the only option he leaves Americans is to beat off enemies with his Nobel after his International pals are strong enough to attack a weakened America. Im sure that must have Moscow and Peking shaking in their boots. This next two quotes also come from the Reuters piece: Who the hell constitutes our? And if he has a vision he better tell the rest of us how he plans to change human nature. It is human nature that will forever keep Socialist/Communist utopian garbage out of reach. And you can take this one to the bank. You know it is a cover for treason whenever an influential Communist falls back on saying everybody who disagrees is wrong. On a lighter note: It was nice to see that Goofy Annan still has a hand in the game. I miss the old Goofer. He was a fun guy when he had the secretary-generals job. New START And this: Turner to Obama: What Flexibility? BY: Bill Gertz - March 26, 2012 1:19 pm http://freebeacon.com/turner-to-obama-what-flexibility/ Why would anyone believe a liar like Hussein in the first place? Democrats have a long history of making promises to get what they want then completely ignoring the promises when it suits them. Domestic promises like the ones they gave Ronald Reagan to get the first amnesty for illegals are bad enough, but Husseins broken promises betrays the country to foreign powers. The popular image of traitors has them working for their countrys sworn enemies. Traitors in Hollywood movies meet their contacts in secret places in order to pass top secret documents to foreign governments; sometimes because they are true believers; sometimes for money; often because they are being blackmailed, or because they are just plain old-fashioned scoundrels. Is it treason in real life when favors are given to an enemy on the diplomatic level? No dark deed from the past need be used as leverage. It comes down to one Socialist innocently talking to another for the purpose of advancing an agreed upon global agenda. These little exchanges could take place over dinner, or perhaps on the golf course certainly not during a debriefing session in a windowless cement room. Where would the harm to the United States be if a couple of Socialist big shots talk a little politics? In Husseins case no money changed hands unless you make the case that Russia helping him to a second term is payment of a sort. The cynics among us insist the US is harmed. What about the others? Every Democrat senator voted to ratify New START. There is no doubt in my mind that every one of them is in complete agreement with Hussein and Russia. Not a one of todays Democrats has any connection to the last good Democrat, Harry Truman: They can try to coverup by saying they did not fully understand their president until now, but that does not explain all of the betrayals since 1945. Nor does it explain why House Democrats made Nancy Pelosi Speaker of House knowing full-well what she is. The problem is one the intelligence community should be handing. Unfortunately, Democrats now control every intelligence agency. Theres not a freaking chance any high-ranking Democrat traitor will be investigated let alone convicted. At least in the early years of the Cold War traitors had to be careful. Today, they operate with impunity so long as they do their dirty business for the International community and/or the United Nations. Finally. Will anybody ask the eight RINO who helped the Democrats ratify New Start be asked how they feel about their vote now? Specifically, will Indiana Senator Richard Lugar, the worst RINO of the eight who voted to ratify, pay the price in his reelection fight for the Republican nomination? Will Lugars opponent have the courage to make the New START vote a campaign issue as it should be? After all, Hussein provided the opening. So if the Republican mantra is Anybody But Obama should that not include those Republicans who helped him? Heres a foundation article that puts all of the others in perspective. Its in two parts: Is THIS the 'flexibility' Obama promised Russia on nukes? President caught on mic asking Moscow for 'space' until 2nd term. Published: 8 hours ago by AARON KLEIN TEL AVIV What specifically was President Obama referring to when he told Russian President Dmitri Medvedev he would have more flexibility after the November election to deal with controversial issues such as missile defense? In remarks caught on mic and later broadcast around the world, Obama asked Medvedev to tell incoming Russian President Vladimir Putin to give him more space, indicating missile issues can be resolved during a second term in office. Obama made the remarks in a bilateral meeting at the Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul. Stated Obama: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but its important for him to give me space. Medvedev replied: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you. Obama then stated: This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility. Last year, Obama committed to reducing stocks of U.S. weapons-grade plutonium and signed an agreement that will lower the countrys deployed nuclear arsenals. Obamas science czar, John Holdren, long petitioned for the moves in a magazine whose personnel were used for the benefit of Soviet propaganda in an attempt to disarm America, according to a former top intelligence official during the Soviet era. The magazines founders were accused of providing vital nuclear secrets that helped the Soviets develop an atomic bomb.