A rather obvious question to be answered by the Russian investigations...

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by SillyAmerican, Aug 4, 2017.

  1. SillyAmerican

    SillyAmerican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3,678
    Likes Received:
    1,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Lou Dobbs states it quite plainly on the August 4th edition of Lou Dobbs Tonight:

    And I've been saying here that the number one question in the so called "Russia collusion" investigation -- which is a manifest joke, by the way, from top to bottom in my opinion. But if there is a question to be answered, it is how in the hell did the DNC get away with telling the CIA, the FBI to get away from their servers just because they had some sort of national security interest in it all, and why in the world did the FBI and the CIA say "oh, very well, Democratic National Committee people, we'll just step back and get out of your way, and let the Russians have their way with you." I mean, this is absurd.

    Does anyone have a good answer to this rather simple question? How does one tell the FBI to go take a hike? And in what universe does the FBI, once told, say, "Ok. Sorry to bother you..."? As Dobbs says, the entire situation makes no sense whatsoever.
     
  2. gophangover

    gophangover Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    5,433
    Likes Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Comey did extensive investigation into the emails, and found no crimes. Congress did many investigations, and found no crimes. Hours and hours of testimony from Hill....nothing.
     
  3. SillyAmerican

    SillyAmerican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3,678
    Likes Received:
    1,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your response fails to answer the question. The FBI knew that the Russian's were up to something, and approached the DNC with that information. They were told to get lost. The questions are (1) how/why does somebody tell the FBI to take a hike, and (2) how/why does the FBI comply with such a request? The facts in this regard are fairly straight forward: the FBI talked to the DNC, the DNC told them not to be concerned with their servers. The rest, as they say, is history.
     
    JakeJ and PrincipleInvestment like this.
  4. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They told the DHS to take a hike too.
     
    PrincipleInvestment likes this.
  5. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How does one do an "extensive investigation" into something they have no access to?

    It's like having the fire inspector do an arson investigation by interviewing the homeowner and then drafting the report.
     
    JakeJ and Stevew like this.
  6. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,497
    Likes Received:
    6,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The answer is quite easy. The CIA, FBI, and others did not want it to appear as they were involving themselves in the 2016 presidential election and trying to influence it in any way.
     
  7. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, instead of "grossly negligent" he found them instead to be "extremely careless".
     
    JakeJ, Stevew and PrincipleInvestment like this.
  8. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,795
    Likes Received:
    32,504
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't care what questions get answered or not.

    As long as the end result is:

    Trump getting hung from his Stitched Horsehides.
     
  9. icehole3

    icehole3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2017
    Messages:
    8,414
    Likes Received:
    10,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Congress
    Comey was told to by Lynch the email investigation was a "matter." There is a ongoing investigation by Chaffetz on the emails. So no Congress hasn't had many email investigations that found nothing, youre mixing the Benghazi scandal with the email scandals.
     
  10. icehole3

    icehole3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2017
    Messages:
    8,414
    Likes Received:
    10,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    wet dream
     
    Dayton3 likes this.
  11. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I've no doubt Debbie Wasserman put her crack team of Pakistani hackers straight to work on the DNC servers once the breach was discovered ...
     
  12. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,497
    Likes Received:
    6,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    More like complete idiocy. No matter what he did Donald Trump will not go to prison for anything relating to this.
     
  13. icehole3

    icehole3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2017
    Messages:
    8,414
    Likes Received:
    10,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hillary maybe not Trump. She's probably chitting in her diaper right .about now.
     
  14. Stevew

    Stevew Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2015
    Messages:
    6,501
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Comey also admitted wrong doing UNDER OATH as well. When the phony political and media drumbeats start to die down, then rational legal minds will begin to weigh in on this whole issue. But currently, it is too hazardous to say anything against these irrational dems.

    Just like the 2016 election, the American people are watching this BS and it might end up that the next election being completely opposite of what dems and media are TRYING to convince people of. It's very likely dems will destroy their own credibility for at least a generation or so. What else can they do but fight back SOMEHOW, but their hole keeps getting deeper.

    Steve
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2017
    JakeJ likes this.
  15. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You also posted in the past you don't care how many people were killed as long as Trump did not become president concerning Seth Rich, correct?
     
  16. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Another unanswered question is why only Russia? Why not ANY country that interfered and why not ANYONE who illegally tried to influence the election?
    That question alone proves the goal is REALLY to maintain and escalate the Cold War against Russia for the $$, jobs and power it brings. Obviously, Democrats openly colluding with the Ukraine government to defeat Trump was A-OK.
     
  17. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,543
    Likes Received:
    11,219
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The FBI needs a warrant. They didn't ask for one or have one. I think all part of the DOJ collusion with and tacit support of Hillary and the DNC.
     
  18. SillyAmerican

    SillyAmerican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3,678
    Likes Received:
    1,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes. And riddle me this: why would an investigative agency interview someone under investigation without first mirandizing them? Does that make any sense whatsoever? I mean, other than going through the motions and hoping nobody notices they're not actually taking the investigation seriously?
     

Share This Page