A St. Louis prosecutor is investigating whether the white couple pointing guns at Black Lives Matter

All you have to do is watch the news to see what these groups have engaged in, burning, looting, breaking windows oh and now a report in Seattle a child was sexually assault in the anarchy district. ANYONE seeing those criminals breaking down the gate to enter that private property would have a reasonable belief their property and their lives were in danger and then of course the verbal threats.

 

Apparently St. Louis isn't a hotbed for individual property rights.

 

She was. He on the other hand muzzle swept his own wife like a total noob.

The mob broke down a gate to a private community, it is they who should be charged.

 

Democrat activists posing as reporters are below child molestors.

 

I was specifically addressing that group in StLouis who marched through that neighborhood by that house on their way to that mayor's house. Of in other cities and or other demonstration there was rioting, looting, and all sorts of bad schiest. I did not say otherwise.

 

The DA is a black woman who doesn't have a lot of love for white people. She got her position using Soros dollars. This is the same lady who released ALL of the rioters and looters who pillaged St Louis earlier this month. She apparently wants to burn the system down. You can expect charges. This should be yet another message to white liberals.... virtue signaling gets you nowhere.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/who-is-kimberly-gardner-st-louis-prosecutor

At what point can the federal government arrest for Soros for sedition? I do not believe there is a monster more evil than him on the planet. His fingers are ALL over the fiasco of the past month. At the very least, can't somebody sue him for the billion plus in property damage done across the nation?

 

At what point will the State Attorney General step in and protect the citizens from this mob DA?

 

YEA so was I, I make no distinctions between the criminals all marching under the same banners. The couple had every reasonable doubt they would engage in the same property destruction at the least and the criminals were clearly signally they would use violence against them.

 

Of course that match could have turned bad but at the time Bonnievand Clyde stood out there it was not, which is a good thing.

 

That was up to the criminals not the law abiding property owners protecting their property from them and their threats. I don't think angry criminal mobs are a good thing anytime how about you?

 

Two bad actors broke down their gate? Don't think so. Breaking the gate and uttering death threats, "peaceful protesters"..... right.

 

It's straight apologism for lawlessness and mobs in the streets.

 

Angry mobs make terrible judgement, that is why we transitioned to professional police forces, and advancement that the forces that want to make us more primitive seek to undo.

Last year, the question What law-abiding person needs an assault weapon? was asked as if it were self-answering and the answer was Obviously, no one. Last year.

It is impossible to understand the politics of the Left without grasping that it is all about deniable intimidation.

That’s why they don’t want you to own guns. And that’s why the Ken-and-Karen case has the left and its media enablers so upset. They want you cowering in your home, calling for police protection that their political action has made sure won’t come. Or worrying that that might happen so that you yield to their demands. If you’re out on the steps with guns in your hands, suddenly the script has flipped. Either they’re intimidated, which is bad for morale when you’re running a mob, or they escalate and become so violent that the “deniable” part of the intimidation is gone, because they can’t pretend even to themselves that this was a “parade” of “peaceful protesters,” and a more violent response to the mob becomes certain in the future. And while mobs can dish out violence, they usually don’t take it very well, lacking discipline and cohesion. That’s why the goal is to keep the violence ongoing, but at a low enough level that it seems easier to go along than fight. Open resistance interferes with that, and sets an example for others.

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/384110/

 

Of no one thinks angry mobs are good. Those two were hardly protecting anything, they were play acting.

 

I'm not surprised to learn that personal injury lawyers have a house like that in Louisiana. Awful state to be a defendant. 99% chance they're dems, too. About 1 in every 100 attorneys in the plaintiffs' bar are dems.

 

As you can see, they obviously thought an angry mob was not good and protected their domicile, your opinion notwithstanding. Bet if it was YOUR home, your tune would change.

 

That would explain their complete lack of understanding of gun safety, in general.

 

Why they didn't attempt to murder? Why not execute them for capital murder if you can put forth a bunch of punitive charges that had nothing to do with what they did?

 

Drama much?

 

They donate to both parties but have statements that support BLM.

 

She's a political activist. If she had something to charge them with she would have done it. Now she probably has a team trying to figure out some manufactured charge or arcane law she can use to punish people for protecting their property.

 

This is clearly a castle doctrine issue. These people were facing a mob of criminals which groups have engaged in nation wide burnings and looting private properties and even assulting those they beloved oppose their political views. And the DA wants to charge them instead of the actual criminals. Where is this country headed?

 

Absoluetly false on it's face. The were facing an angry mob of criminals threatening them and their property and no police to protect them.

 

As I routinely note one of the main purposes of the 2nd Amendment is clearly demonstrated here. The government cannot always protect you from roving bands of criminal marauders. As here go back to Hurricane Katrina.

 

I only have two problems. One, they both need some training, her most of all. Two, they didn't have enuf gun. If that was me, the fiance would have had the AR15 and I would have the AR10.