Alabama’s Draconian Abortion Ban Has Women On Twitter Ready To Fight

You are entitled to that opinion (albeit that it's absurd), but you are not entitled to impose that opinion on others.

I mention that it's absurd because "conception" produces a zygote - a single celled entity. Identical twins spring from a single zygote, that's why they're called monozygotic. There are also monozygotic triplets and quadruplets. So there's something wrong with the notion that a zygote = a distinct human life.

 

Your vacuous OPINION does not alter the DOCUMENTED FACTUAL REALITY that the right to an abortion both existed and was practiced when our nation was founded. You have consistently FAILED to even attempt to provide any shred of substantiation for the insipid content of your posts.

Until you learn to refrain from PROJECTING your own shortcomings onto others you have effectively DISQUALIFIED yourself from any further meaningful interaction on this topic as far as I am concerned.

Have a nice day!

 

I guess I could be a pompous ass like most liberals and just claim to know everything about everything

 

So your arbitrary standard is the ability to reside outside the body

But how long can a newborn survive without help from someone?

minutes or perhaps hours

The same as many elderly people who we can assume are next on the lib chopping block

 

I asked you a question and you failed to answer

Are you a Christian now?

 

I am saying that men make laws defining what is a person and those laws can be changed with the stroke of a pen

But Nature through science knows that unborn children are as human as you or I

An unborn child has the dna that proves it is a distinct human being

 

It is with libs who desperately want to dehumanize the unborn children who are being killed

 

The laws against killing innocent human beings exist in Christian societies and in godless lib/progressive societies alike

You just prefer a standard that does not include unborn children

 

Dont be silly

Of course I can impose my ideas on you through the legeslative process

 

That's because the water is poisoned. Whether by design or by accident, it is poisoned with religious nonsense and psychobabble.

The government of the United States has no constitutional authority to tell a woman or any citizen what they may do with their body.

 

Good, looks like you just admitted you don't know anything about who has abortions.....that's a good start

 

That's not what viability means....you just admitted in another thread you didn't know everything about everything and you obviously don't know what viability means.

Viability means the feus can survive after leaving the women's body....it no longer needs to be attached to her or in her to survive...it will , for instance, be able to breathe on it's own..

 

You have not proven me wrong

 

WHO are they?

The HUMAN FETUS is what is killed in abortion and I have never said otherwise...

 

Surrrre, you saying so makes it true ?? No.

 

Being viable outside the womb is your standard

My standard is that unborn humans are not guilty of any crime and deserve to live as long as they are able to either inside or outside the womb

 

I looked it up and I was correct

https://thefrisky.com/study-finds-married-women-have-more-abortions-than-anyone-else/

 

I have noticed that states who believe all Americans have rights have started fighting back...

Vermont, law proposed to provide some of the strongest protections for abortion rights.

Utah, DA refuses to enforce law banning abortion after 18 weeks.

Wisconsin, governor will veto bill that Repugs support making it a felony for physicians to fail to care for terminal babies.

Michigan, governor will veto Repug's bill that would ban the most common second trimester abortion procedure.

Nevada even repealed a 1911 law against a woman terminating her own pregnancies...


Protesters all over the US, those who don't want to go back to legal slavery of women..

So , the list is starting...and will build...

 

In this special case the fetus is not entirely innocent in relation to the woman.

It is, in fact, threatening the woman's life, the fact that the woman (and the man) is responsible for it's being there in the first place is irrelevant. Your argument is like saying that women who cross a dangerous and delicate bridge have no right to grab the bridge and damage it if they slip while crossing. People have an absolute right to defend their lives, no matter how their lives came into jeopardy.

I get sick of this, if the man had the baby this would not even be under discussion, you know that and so do I.

 

This law is telling us what we may expect if Republicans stay in power. We HAVE to get rid of ALL of them or we WILL have a theocracy in this country. Watch "The Handmaid's Tale" or even better read the book. That is EXACTLY what the Republicans want for us and what you WILL get if you vote for them,

 

Using planned plunderhood sure is important to Democrats. The doctors of death love all the attention.

 

Libs are funny

We dont mention God and use only scientific evidence to argue for the unborn

So they have to drag God who they hate into the debate themselves

 

""""""""Of course women retaining the right to their own bodies makes them more powerful!

That's why Repubs want to take away that right"""""""""

 

If the baby is their body, then since it is shared, it is also the males body. I claim his right to save his child. In fact if her body wants to keep the body intruding on her, let the male wanting out of the deal out. And let him take her to the planned plunderhood doctor and tell the doctor to abort her body and pay no attention to her claims she wants a baby.

 

Science says that the fetus threatens the woman's life and that is indisputable. Women die from complications due to pregnancy or in childbirth every day and have from time immemorial.