Alabama’s Draconian Abortion Ban Has Women On Twitter Ready To Fight

Welcome back. I am sure MZ is relieved.

 

I am able to connect dots and read between the lines, and I'm not a child. I know very well, and so do you, that the emotional foundation for anti-abortion laws derives from religious dogma and superstition.

Yes, the laws in question are state laws, no doubt, but by way of the 14th Amendment a woman's right to choose is protected by federal law. They all admit their goal is to have Roe overturned, and with the religious on the court, that will likely succeed.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So you think women should be punished for taking a risk, like every other human on earth does at some time or another.

If a person lives in tornado alley I guess you think they have to stand outside in a tornado because they took a risk living there and NOT get any aid if they're injured or lose their belongings…or not have the CHOICE to move... how odd..

No, you have no point.





So? That DOES NOT mean you can't FIX the "bad things" that happen....

One risks a lot mountain climbing but that doesn't mean if they fall and are injured they should just lay there and die...that would be stupid.
Click to expand...

SO?

It's legal and it is a fix...and I schooled you in what "risk" means...and women have a right to fix the results of their risks just like everyone else

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So you think women should be punished for taking a risk, like every other human on earth does at some time or another.

If a person lives in tornado alley I guess you think they have to stand outside in a tornado because they took a risk living there and NOT get any aid if they're injured or lose their belongings…or not have the CHOICE to move... how odd..

No, you have no point.





So? That DOES NOT mean you can't FIX the "bad things" that happen....

One risks a lot mountain climbing but that doesn't mean if they fall and are injured they should just lay there and die...that would be stupid.

WHERE did I mention my mother? And why are you mentioning my mother?

Do you have a "mommy" problem?

Or a deep seated need to make everything personal..

Oh do go on now, it's you cue to yak about all your wives and kids and screwing around with your friends wife and all those other oft repeated but GEE DARN So interesting stories of your fascinating life of marrying and having sex with all those women and how your life was as if there was anything whatosever of interest that happened in it with your bikini clad daughter that you wanted everyone on the internet to see...why didn't you show her nude photo you seem to LIKE her so much...yes, please tell us more about you "fascinating life" and how it never has anything to do with the topic...……….





Clearly you made it to this forum. Some mother saved you by the bell.[/QUOTE]

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
********************************

….and says more than your posts …..like this one.. …

 

You introduced the Bible as part of your argument.

And Christian beliefs are not the topic here either

Even though you obviously want it to be

 

Yes, ALL pregnancies harm the woman's body and cause pain and suffering and ALL have the risk of death BUT Anti-Choicers say " Hey ,It's only a few women who die so that's no big deal.""...

With the FACT that pregnancy harms ALL women and causes pain and suffering FORCING them to gestate is ASSAULT.

It's also cruel and unusual punishment..

I sure wish Dem politicians would start speaking up about that.....

 

I am sure you see that as a cute remark on a rather serious subject, but people who see abortion as covered by the Ninth Amendment aren't Christians as a general rule. I suppose some are, but Christians are more likely to be pro-life.

 

If you don't know the difference between the State of Alabama and the United State of America, then something has gone wrong with your "education."

 

If you are arguing against abortion at any point of development I’m ok with that

But I think you want abortion at any and all stages

 

You are a thpical lib who wants to ignore science and argue religion instead

 

I do know the difference sir, very well. And I know the spirit and letter of the 14th Amendment.

 

Yep!

LOL - No, you can't have it both ways, no matter how desperately hard you try. You're either for legalized abortion or you're not.

Was that idiotic remark directed at me? I'm an Agnostic who supports a woman's right to obtain an abortion. Furthermore, unlike a lot of atheistic "progressive" hypocrites, I don't think a person's right to control their bodies and healthcare decisions ends at the womb.

 

It doesn't sound like it. Read your posts again.

 

Really?

No line in the sand for me

I support both the alabama and georgia law

But I think only one of them will get past the unelected demigods on the SC

So I am quite flexible on the abortion question

 

Being pro-choice is not "having it both ways." It is a matter of recognizing that there is valid room for disagreement about the status of a developing fetus, and concluding that one's personal opinion on this should not be imposed on others. My impression is that the other side actually denies there is valid room for disagreement. This seems a religious, or quasi-religious, position. All devout believers think THEIR religion is the truest.

 

I am claiming that what liberals cold bloodedly refer to as a fetus is a buman being with dna distinctive to itself

 

Based on what?

That we do not want to allow liberal women to kill their unborn children?

 

What does "distinctive DNA" have to do with anything? Identical twins don't have distinctive DNA.

 

Because its morally wrong to kill n innocent human being

 

It means a lot

That makes the unborn child an individual human being in its own rite

 

Yet your neglect of humans already born kills humans every day.

 

But the existence of identical twins demonstrates that having a specific set of DNA does not equate to being a unique individual. While the production of a zygote is a developmental milestone, the fact that a zygote can become anywhere from 0-4 individuals, and this implies that a zygote cannot be considered an individual human being. That being the case, there is no specific point in development that is unequivocally and undeniably the point of demarcation. So although you are free to believe whatever you like, that will merely be opinion - and an opinion that you have no right to impose on others.

 

YOU do NOT dictate what's moral and what is not. to others.

 

So from that can I take it you don't care if conservative women "kill their unborn children" ?