[video=youtube;HOJubxHYt4Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOJubxHYt4Q[/video] [video=youtube;nxHgWNkN_TQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxHgWNkN_TQ[/video] [video=youtube;DU4rFi9v9Zs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU4rFi9v9Zs[/video] _
Bob and weave. I will show you how to directly answer a question again rather than your normal deflection... Yes the Muslims acted in a criminal manner by assaulting the jerks with signs. I specifically find fault with the throwing of objects because that is assault. See that was easy. Christian festivals commonly take over public property. Example: any Catholic festival that has a parade. So I will ask the question again... If this had been a group of Muslims protesting in the middle of a Christian festival holding signs saying Christian are going to burn in hell, would you stand up for the Muslims rights? Again...Tell me I am wrong If this group of Muslims in Dearborn had hung a gay person recently i think we would probably have seen those gay protesters you are requesting
Uhm, it is not just a parade, it is a party. It reacts the walking of Joseph and Mary at the time of Jesus Birth, ie the nativity scene.
Yes, I have read that report, if you want to call it that. It still does not negate the fact that what I said was true, unfortunately for you.
I have been trying to tell Americans who love this country that nothing short of armed resistance will work. Can't you see that?
Blacks and Muslims represent a serious threat to our country. But they have no idea what will happen when millions of armed citizens desend on them for a much needed ethnic cleansing. Give me freedom from diversity or give me death.
I really think you meant this as an attack on Right Wing sites, when in fact your comment is a condemnation of Left Wing sites.
A culture that allows it's institutions of learning to be overrun by cultural Stalinists (disguised as educators) so they can indoctrinate is horrible.
The bull horn was bit much, and it looked to me like they were looking for trouble by mocking the Islamo's. If you are going to poke a hornets nest you gotta expect to get stung. With that said, Islamo's always resort to violence. Always. Islam is a satanic murder cult no matter where they are, even in America.
Romney opposes a lot of things that Americans also oppose (affirmative action, Islamization, immigration, gun control, etc). If he just wasn't so hooked in with the rich, and refuses to hike their taxes, he'd have a great chance to win. Problem is, he won't give up that very unpopular stance, and older Americans are afraid of his typical anti-Social Security, Medicare, and other entitlement programs. I won't be voting for either of them, but at this point, I'm guessing we'll have another 4 years of Obama, and his scary coziness with the Muslim Brotherhood.
What? I suggest you stop panicking for non-existent inferences. I'm asking you to put up what "Jewish Terrorist Acts" you're attempting to put up against those cites by others in this thread.
I am getting real tired of doing your homework and correcting your mistakes. This thread is about an invalid claim. It has nothing to do with Jewish terrorism in the US. Since you asked. http://www.haaretz.com/print-editio...f-series-of-attacks-over-past-12-years-1.4973 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States The Jewish Defense League (JDL) was founded in 1969 by Rabbi Meir Kahane in New York City, with its declared purpose the protection of Jews from harassment and antisemitism.[8] FBI statistics show that, from 1980 to 1985, 15 terrorist attacks were attempted in the U.S. by JDL members.[9] The FBI’s Mary Doran described the JDL in 2004 Congressional testimony as "a proscribed terrorist group".
You're getting real tired of what again? I haven't made any mistakes in this thread. I responded to your post - the one which brought up the idea of Jewish Terrorist attacks in the US as being more prevalent than Islamic Terrorist attacks in the US - by asking for details on the types of attacks you're attempting to comparatively draw. You now say that this thread has nothing to do with Jewish Terrorism. So why did you bring it up? You have given me no answers, and you're the one making the claim, so supporting the claim isn't a matter of someone else "doing homework" for you in order to help make your case. Providing a link to a "Jewish Terrorist" in Israel has nothing to do with Jewish Terrorist acts in the US as you claimed, and a one-paragraph cite which speaks of terrorist plans and nothing else doesn't cut it. You don't appear able to back your claim - but your attempt to deflect from the point of the OP is noted. Pathetic.
Sucks to be wrong again, huh!!! Anyways, let me know when you find credible evidence to back up this thread, then when we discuss the validity of your bigotry.
I agree that the crowd becoming violent was wrong, however, I will admit that a part of me wanted such a reaction to happen to that church holding up signs that god is happy for dead soldiers. This group was no different, their only intent was to insult and enrage. Just imagine if muslims had shown up to a christain event and hoisted signs up about christians burning in hell.
Well, I guess if America chooses a community organizer with a failed presidential record over a successful business man with a plan to fix the mess we're in, they deserve what they get.
Being a successful business man and being a successful politician is like being a successful basketball player and being a successful basketball coach. They are mutually exclusive. The biggest problem for Mitt Romney as a politiician is that he does not stand for anything in the long run. That is what a successful businessman does. If the winds change to be more profitable, so will Romney. And Romney's economic policy is a deficit ridden policy that really does not solve the current problems, even you cut expenditures 10 to one. The revenues will never be there under those plans and the economy will not grow as you will predict because the average private consumer is still up to their eyeballs in debt.
What the hell are you talking about? I have made one comment in this thread, and that was to criticize your attempt to equate "Jewish Terrorism" in the US with Islamic Terrorism. I called you out to substantiate your claims by offering the exact nature of the supposed "Jewish Terrorism" in the US, so we can see if they're in any way comparable. You - predictably - utterly failed, while flailing about with limp histrionic wrist. How about you man up for once in your life and defend what you said? Credible evidence to back up this thread? THERE'S A FOCKING VIDEO RIGHT IN THE OP.