ANALYSIS: Democrats have a Colonel Vindman problem

Just goes along with Trump's history.

 

A lot of you just don’t get it. Remember when Schumer said you don’t go against the intelligence community? You are seeing that in action and supporting the corrupt deep state.

Flynn did the same. He wanted a complete audit of the intelligence community. It hasn’t been done since 1975.

The useful idiots are easy to manipulate.

 

Is that what Rush and Hannity said? Well then it must be gospel truth. Sorry, I have not yet been Hannitized or become a Ditto Head. Schumer makes an off hand comment, Sean’s copywriters sieze on it and it becomes a giant conspiracy involving 10s of thousands of people whose sole objective is to pick on Donny Trump. Talk about useful idiots who are easy to control.

 

Prove me wrong instead of your childish rant.

 

The ongoing Deep State investigations will be over shortly which will settle this once and for all.

What exactly did Schumer mean by his statement?

 

That's an interesting proposition.

I'd love to hear your game plan on how a guy who broke both his oath as a military officer, and undermined the POTUS foreign policies is going to do that.

 

I was just using their own methods against them there.

And yeah, even the Marines had our 10%.

 

No, because unlike a leftist, I don't think what the headline tells me to think.

Nice self own there.

 

You're welcome to take that however you'd like, and I pared it down as far as I could for you.

If you're still not getting it, then stumble on your way.

 

So when you make a claim, fail to support it, insults follow? Very Trumpian.

 

It's not my fault you don't see it.

You go ahead and attribute it to whatever makes you feel better.

 

At this point, it appears your posts are simply lashing out because I am not buying your unsupported claim.

Let me tell you something young man or woman, letting you in on a secret.

When I ask someone if they have a link for something, it is because I know they don't, that what they claimed, like what you claimed, is untrue. I do this because I enjoy feeling like the smartest *********ker in the room, and I like watching folks twist, spin, and distort followed by a series of juvenile insults **** towards me.

Ever see Searching for Bobby Fisher? Let me give you a tip. If I ask for a link, take the *********king draw and walk away. I have already won, and you just don't know it.

 

Womp womp.

I gave you the link.

I bolded the line in the link that contained as few words as possible to help you.

Let me give you a tip: I don't give a ****. If you want to ignore the obvious, or just don't understand it, that's your problem. Go live as best you are able.

 

Obviously you do care as you are sitting here claiming that which is untrue.

 

Like I said, you're free to believe whatever you'd like.

If you can't or won't see the bolded sentence published by the NYT, that's your problem.

 

Excellent. I will then allow that to be the final word on the matter, and we are through.

 

He no doubt meant that when you start trashing FBI and CIA operatives that they have or can gain access into any shady dealings you are or ever have been involved in and dig deeper if they find reason to. Careful who you mess with, especially if you are living in a glass house or have skeletons in your closet.

 

He has not been charged with any crimes by either the DOJ or the US Military. Unfortunately for you, being smeared and accused by Sean Hannity and all of his Hannitized imbecile brigade carries no weight in the real world.

 

That doesn't mean he failed to obey the orders of the POTUS and undermined US foreign policy.

 

You mean the order not to cooperate with the Congressional inquiry? That’s an illegal order and could end up being an article of impeachment for obstruction of justice. Ask Dick Nixon.

 

Almost every administration pushes back on congressional overreach, even George Washington ignored a congressional subpoena. The courts often settle these disagreements. You're hoping for a process crime like Mueller specializes in with no underlying crime.

 

Right, because you think Congress has power over the Executive branch.

That's just an opinion based on a lack of civics knowledge.