Another take on the vaccines

Please comprehend what you read.....I said IF. Explain any other conclusions your think the reader should take from your posts.

I refer to the commitment you and others on this thread have taken to be PR reps and advocates for medications that are being falsely represented to the public and the questionable procedures and declarations that the pharmaceutical companies in conjunction with the FDA are pushing.

I notice you ignored my example. Simple research will corroborate my story. Similar situation is now happening with Covid.

 

Anti-vaxxer.

 

translation: Our laughing LangelyMan can't logically or rationally defend his position anymore, so he sputters this childish retort as if that's an answer.

He's done, and I'm done wasting time on him.

 

It's actually a factual statement that makes you quite uncomfortable.

You are effectively defending censorship, and maybe having trouble trying to rationalize that awkward position.

 

But I'm not done commenting on your BS when I see it. To wit...

"I refer to the commitment you and others on this thread have taken to be PR reps and advocates for medications that are being falsely represented to the public and the questionable procedures and declarations that the pharmaceutical companies in conjunction with the FDA are pushing."​

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/another-take-on-the-vaccines.586146/page-9#post-1072535310

 

No, the comment is propaganda.

 

Not my protocols this is minimum standard for scientific or even just academic standard. If that was an assignment submitted to a first year class at a tertiary institute it would get an Fminus

 

Link does not work