yeah, this said 30% republican, 20% democrat and 50% independent https://www.quora.com/Are-the-people-that-commit-mass-shooting-mass-murders-democrats-or-republicans
What a brilliant source. How did it come to this conclusion? So looking at that we know that white males are slightly more likely to be on the Republican side of things. Why do I even bother.
Factually incorrect. Their classification of being anti-gun is due to supporting firearm-related restrictions that make it more difficult for other people to legally own firearms.
I believe some might think that because of the countless times Right wingers bash left wingers as being anti gun. Don’t want people to think someone with a gun is right wing then maybe don’t keep claiming the left is anti gun. You reap what you sow.
You mean actual research instead of using this argument? All cows are brown. My dog is brown. Therefore my dog is a cow.
If they do not wish to be classified as anti-gun, they should not support greater firearm-related restrictions that do nothing but make it more difficult for an individually to legally own firearms.
I hear a benefit concert is being thrown for the moron. New far laft poster child? please let it be so
So you're saying all I need to do is search the parties in the family law court records, and cross reference them with either a phone book, facebook, or something like the tax rolls, and then cruise by their house with a gun and rob them blind since they'll be disarmed? Truly you are a member of the Brain Trust sir or maam.
Please provide evidence for the fact that CHL holders (the people legally carrying who commit much less crime on average the other poster referenced) commit the most mass shootings.
There's no debate here. Someone was supporting murder and right wingers simply jumped in to support it. And that is why American right wingers are deemed to be the ultimate extremists by the civilised world. God bless and good night.
It was not supporting murder. Murder would be an unjustified homicide. Here, the homicide was by all accounts apparently justified. Saying that could be the start of a new trend is supporting justifiable homicide in response to deadly force employed against oneself without legal excuse..... That's not "hate talk". I'm pretty sure the "civilised" (sic) world considers folks like Isis or Rodrigo Duterte to be far worse extremists but ymmv.
But please do remember this guy who pulled a gun on the cops was a left winger. I am not cheering his death but what did he expect when he pulled a gun on a cop trying to arrest him?
Its not about this fellow. It was about the 'one less lefty' comment. Its a shame that right wingers are so willing to embrace hate talk and see nothing wrong with it. I've made my point and I'm sure the authoritarians will ignore it. Bye
Are you a right winger? “And that is why American right wingers are deemed to be the ultimate extremists by the civilised world”.
uh huh....until somebody takes a knee during the national anthem then all that "freedom of speech" fly out the window. Even the president gets involved and suggest somebody should be fired over such.
so does the right, ask any republican if they think machine guns should be easier for teens to buy, no one wants a 18 year old high school student buying a machine gun but both sides will 100% support your right to own a gun some on both sides will support taking the right to own a gun away from ex-felons even after they have completed their sentence... so by your logic republicans are anti-gun
