Appeals court judges push back at request to dismiss Michael Flynn case

Tell me what you say Rule 48A is all about, specifically, the words.......'leave of the Court.'

 

You may want to look further. Judge throws out guilty verdict against Michael Flynn's lobbying partner Bijan Kian

This just shows that you are not getting all the information but think that you have enough to make judgements. That's common for those that have already made up their mind and are too stubborn to look further.

And yet it is a part of the dismissal argument. As such it obviously wasn't waived.

 

yep...the illegal appointment of Gleesom was why Flynn asked for a Writ

 

Trump can (and will) pardon Flynn before he leaves office on January 20th, since I don't expect this will be resolved in the courts by then.

Make book on the first part of that anyway...

 

It was withheld. Especially the agents' original 302, which is still missing. Along with other notes and materials we now know exist. 40 categories of Brady material were requested in Powell's filing, which was after they withdrew the guilty plea. So, whatever Flynn swore to while his son was being threatened by the FBI (they spied on his son, too), is irrelevant.

 

why? even if biden magically wins and his DOJ does a 180, and withdraws this motion no jury would convicted based on the evidence we know now. There was no crime.

 

No doubt. Flynn's first set of lawyers were horrible, too. Sydney rocks, though!

 

Or colluded with the special counsel to cover its own tracks. Even from the "Protect Mueller" crowd, that level of corruption should be worth an investigation

 

Flynn actually has cause to sue them. Why Flynn thought he'd get adequate representation from a firm that hired Eric Holder is beyond me.

 

Wait, so Flynn hired a democratic lawyer ?

hahahahahahahahahahahahahha

Yeah, those career prosecutors quit because of a democrat lawyer ?

 

..deleted

 

Ok, that's weird, the text in my last post is not showing up. I'll try redoing it here...
Edit: Had to undo some of the quote tags. Not sure why but this was the only way I could get everything to show up.

If Sullivan had followed precedent then yes I would know. But he's not. So no I don't.

Did you read what 21bronco wrote? I'll quote it for you as what he says is true and I've no need to repeat what has already been stated.

21bronco said:

 

Perhaps you can explain then why he has not sued them?

 

Yes I read what Bronco said and gave it the attention it warranted.

 

Mention is again emerging of this allegation that Flynn's plea of guilty was involuntary as a consequence of an FBI investigation into his Son Yet when Flyn was under oath before Judge Sullivan, he insisted that his plea was totally voluntary. Appalling lies being told somewhere by someone. At best, at this stage, that is merely an allegation, and it is not known for example whether Flynn himself made a dropping of that investigation a condition of HIS plea deal. It is also unknown if that investigation had any impact on the plea at all. All I have seen is an allegation that the Son was being investigated, and of course, the innuendo of linkage between that investigation and the plea has been allowed, by default, to flourish ~ uncommented upon by even Wilson.

 

In other words none. IE: You couldn't dispute it so ignored it.

Tell me, do you think it would be illegal for an attorney to lie to the court?

 

because the criminal case hasn’t been dismissed.

but according to Flynn and now the DOJ, the Mueller team violates his Civil Rights...he has grown a to die sue

 

Well, his current case is not over yet. The liberal judge is trying to play prosecutor.

 

Please don't be putting words in my mouth. Bronco is merely parroting.

Absolutely.

 

Parroting what, exactly?

You've yet to post a single fact.

 

So, why does he not sue?

 

Explained already. But perhaps you should email his current attorney, Sidney Powell.

 

Making stupid statement (parroting) is pointless. Sullivan appointed Amicus to take a role akin to Prosecutor, but not the same as Prosecutor.

 

Stupid? Bwahahahha!! The prosecution filed a motion to drop the case and now the judge is wanting a hearing to challenge the prosecution and deny their motion.

Give it a rest.