Are directed energy weapons real?

Why? I gave you useful info in rebuttal you asked for and ignored. Do you do this to deliberately annoy people?

Why don't YOU go through that page and detail what "we know" and using proper scientific rationale debunk your own crap?

 

I have no technical background so I can't opine on this.
https://www.misterrobots.com/lasers

There seem to be some posters here who have some technical background and I wanted them to see your analysis.

All I can do is look a the circumstantial evidence.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...d-energy-weapons-real.612934/#post-1074403476
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/are-directed-energy-weapons-real.612934/#post-1

If we look at who benefited, it seems to be the rich people who wanted to buy the land but couldn't and now can. It the story about the policeman stopping cars with people trying to escape turns out to be true, that fits the scenario; if the owners are dead, it's easier for those rich people to get the land.
If the satellite theory turns out to be wrong, there are plenty of other plausible scenarios that would explain how the fires started. Right now I'm sitting on the fence.

 

What the hell stops you from educating yourself!?

Well, my analysis is accurate and nobody has called it into question.

Nonsense! You can educate yourself and then look at ALL evidence, not the idiotic selective crap that is cherry-picked poor speculation!

Hogwash. What stopped a simple match from lighting it! The land doesn't miraculously become purchasable once burnt. Insurance companies now have to pay out and recover property.

An utterly moronic claim....involving the police now to murder innocent fellow residents? You missed the truly simple reply I gave, "maybe they knew something" that the foolish video maker didn't!

It's been proven wrong. Your claim is absurd, surely you can work out time and motion here - simple math that a child could understand.

Starting with the official and totally obviously correct account. Or a team of crazy arsonists! Or a five year old with a magnifying glass - all uncontrollable despite your claim!

A shame the satellite isn't above it to set it on fire!

 

That issue is dealt with in this video. Watch it from the the 4:43 time mark to the 6:15 time mark.

A HAWAIIAN HOLOCAUST
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Xeg03bATIPZU/

Start watching the above video at the 6:15 time mark.

 

No.

No.

What the hell stops you from detailing the damn thing yourself. I am sick to death of this "watch meh video"! You keep ignoring large posts with your silly irrelevant cherry-picking responses with no analysis, or commentary.

So? Why don't you!? Do you do this to deliberately annoy people? Do you? If not, what is your excuse?

There's my analysis, where's your damn rebuttal! It takes very little thought to see why option 3 in the first list is a show stopper to this truly batshit claim about a laser burning everything!

 

Here's some more info...

Are Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) and HAARP Experiments Being Ratcheted Up Worldwide?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/direc...urce=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

Video: Maui Wildfires: Evidence of Direct Energy Weapon?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video...urce=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

 

Disgraceful! You just dump one batshit post after another and fail every time to defend or debate responses!

You dump up videos: What the hell stops you from detailing the damn thing yourself. I am sick to death of this "watch meh video"! You keep ignoring large posts with your silly irrelevant cherry-picking responses with no analysis, or commentary.

I gave you useful info in rebuttal you asked for and ignored. Do you do this to deliberately annoy people?
Why don't YOU go through that page and detail what "we know" and using proper scientific rationale debunk your own crap?

Do you do this to deliberately annoy people? Do you? If not, what is your excuse?

Regarding my analysis: where's your damn rebuttal! It takes very little thought to see why option 3 in the first list is a show stopper to this truly batshit claim about a laser burning everything!

 

Watch the last fifteen seconds of this video.

Why Laser Weapons Didn't Work, But Are Now Coming Back

 

I was peripherally involved with Directed Energy years ago. There were a variety of weapons at that time under development which included, but were not limited to :
- Stingray - A man-portable weapon which scanned an area with a low power laser. When a reflection from optics or an eyeball (like the light reflected in the proverbial "headlights in a deer's eyes") was encountered, the laser focused down with the object of boiling the fluid in the enemy eyeball and blinding him.
- CCLAW - Close Combat Laser Assault Weapon - A higher power version of Stingray, vehicular mounted, that could "score" enemy optics, rendering them opaque.
- CHAMP - A non-nuclear EMP generator which could be programmed to cover a city block or much greater areas, rendering enemy microcircuits inoperable,

 

No, why? You don't bother debating responses, so what would be the point?