Good news is beginning to trickle in while the country is still twelve months away from changing presidents, and the US Senate. Some of the best news involves education. Michelle Malkin reports: Colorado voters have rejected an attempt to raise state income and sales taxes to fund education, The Denver Post has declared. Colorado bellwether: Voters reject statewide tax increases By Michelle Malkin November 1, 2011 10:46 PM http://michellemalkin.com/2011/11/01/colorado-bellwether-voters-reject-statewide-tax-increases/ Another brief article informs us that teachers are not underpaid as they always claim: Are Public-School Teachers Underpaid? By Andrew G. Biggs Posted on November 01, 2011 11:03 AM http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/281846/are-public-school-teachers-underpaid-andrew-g-biggs I remember former school teacher, former first lady, Laura Bush, saying teachers were not paid enough. Perhaps that explains why her husband allowed Ted Kennedy to write an education bill. In fact, teachers have not been underpaid since Ichabod Crane lusted after Katrina Van Tassel and free meals. Finally, New Jerseys governor, Chris Christie, disappeared in the medias vast abyss after announcing he would not enter the race for the Republican nomination; nevertheless, it was Christie who started the avalanche that is now rolling over teachers unions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=rpfK9QkReXI The following article in two parts is the best news of all because it goes a long way toward explaining the strangling ties binding unemployment, education, and the economy. Like the rest of the government, the education bubble is too big to fail, which means that by the time it fails, so will the whole country. The Education Bubble Daniel Greenfield Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Flip through enough of the 99 percent signs and you realize that the majority of that demographic arent complaining about the lack of financial regulation or income inequalities, so much as theyre upset that they took on loans to pay for college degrees to get jobs that dont actually exist. The fault here isnt Wall Streets, its a policymaking apparatus that decided the way to deal with the loss of manufacturing jobs was to get as many college graduates out there as possible to create the industries of tomorrow. This was Clintons platform and its Obamas Winning the Future platform, pump enough money into education and the jobs will create themselves. The Dot Com boom in the nineties seemed to back up that policy with entirely new companies springing to life with valuations in the hundreds of millions and twenty somethings at the helm. But a good deal of those companies were nothing more than the foam on another bubbleand more problematically the cream of the tech companies were created by college dropouts. Even more problematically, the tech companies liked to save money by importing Chinese and Pakistani employees on H1-B visas as cheap labor, while their lobbies insisted that this would protect American innovation. But the real problem was that swapping manufacturing for college degree jobs solved nothing. American companies that manufacture anything become the tip of an outsourced iceberg. All the companies with the shiny logos depend on Chinese manufacturing and raw materials. They cant create anything that the Peoples Republic of China cant take away from them when the time is right. American companies arent outsourcing labor to China, China is outsourcing design and marketing to them and allowing them to serve as middlemen between Chinese manufacturers and American consumers, until a Chinese company decides to buy their product unit or its reverse engineered copies of their products are good enough that they invest the money in a marketing campaign to establish their own trusted brand. And yet the tech industry is the closest to a college degree success story that we have. The failures are legion. The problem with the college degrees for everyone approach is that creating more college graduates does not proportionally create more jobs, it creates more unemployed college graduates and devalues the worth of a college diploma. Too many college graduates mean that employers will look for higher degree levels. High school diplomas used to be a certificate of competence, then that was devalued through promotion in a system where teachers were expected to move students up to the next class no matter what. When college became the new high school, it was devalued in the same way. There are city and state colleges with students who are barely literate, not in the kids these days use too many abbreviations way, but in the functionally illiterate way. If the goal is to move everyone to the highest level of education possible, the result will not be a more educated population, but an educational system with lower standards and a population that is less educated than ever because actual education becomes more inaccessible as the standards are lowered. Make sure that everyone can afford to take out college loans and the marketplace will compete for students with traditional universities offering a large buffet of educational choices, most of which are not educational or represent any kind of career path outside academia, and private colleges offering useful sounding degrees that no employer will look twice at. For the liberal politicians its a triple score. Money pours into academia which they can use as their own think tanks. The educational system gets four years or more to process students through more sophisticated indoctrination mechanisms. And then the students who cant find jobs join the ranks of the usefully disaffected because somebody must be to blame and it cant possibly be the people pulling the strings of the people shouting at them through megaphones. Clinton told working class voters that the manufacturing jobs were gone, but their kids would all have college degrees. Obama went one better by telling working class voters that they would be retrained to hold down Green Jobs, even as theyre falling faster than the Green companies and their sweetheart government pork. Those lies are what make the class warfare rhetoric out of DC so doubly despicable. Politicians have never honestly talked to voters about what happened to the American economy, instead they fell back on the same mantra of opening up new markets through globalization and creating new jobs through education. None of this is new. The country with the highest degree rate in the world is Russia. The USSR ran its citizens through its educational system at a rate that Elizabeth Warren could only gasp in awe at. But what was its education actually worth? About as much as American degrees are becoming worth. If you throw enough money and manpower at the educational system, you will have a really big educational system. What you will not have is anything of worth to go with it. Only one country that has a higher degree rate than the United States has a higher per capita income and that country has its own oil industry. The usual handwringing that liberal pundits and politicians engage in over how the American educational system is failing compared to countries with higher degree ratios is wasted noise. These same statistics are trotted out to justify dumping more money into the black hole of an educational system under the pretext of job creation. But do the statistics even matter? According to the OECD (another useless globalization organization wrapped around a WW2 fossil) the Israeli educational system is a hopeless failure. In its 2009 evaluation claimed that Israeli students were behind Turkey, Dubai and Russia in math and science. Yet peculiarly enough Israel keeps collecting Nobel prizes and turning out minor things like instant messaging, drones and Kinect. When reality contradicts statistics, its wise to go with reality. Thats a skill most politicians havent learned, but its a rather valuable one. The universalization of education is not about remaining competitive in a global marketplace or any of that other nonsense piously repeated by politicians with their hands in more pockets than a thieving octopusits about promoting the homogeneity of ideas across a population. Which is why the importance placed on universal education increases as a country becomes more culturally diverse or internally divided. The original Department of Education was created two years after the Civil War. The Kalamazoo School Case, which set the precedent for forcing taxpayers to fund public education and created the entire system of property tax school robbery we live under today, took place during the same period. As was the National Education Association whose Committee of Ten played a key role in the standardization of the national curriculum. A better name for universal education is federalized education, and there is very little difference between the two in the United States. The growing federal control of education is a mechanism for maintaining control of increasingly divided populations. It may be a failed mechanism, but like the rest of the governments boondoggles, it long ago created a class of people who depend on the system and have a vested interest in its expansion.