Believer in the official version of 9/11 looking for hard proof of a conspiracy

See.. even YOu are getting close.

Blamed is an excellent choice of words.

I think we are coming closer to more revelations. Pleased to be able to help you on your journey to ungullibilitising yourself.

 

The only ones who embraced Saddam with 'huge arms deals' was the former Soviet Union...

 

Is it a nice place? The land of delusion?

Saddam was put in power by the US and was propped up with more US arms than he knew what to do with.

The US has a history of supporting horrific dictators.

 

And COMPLETELY wrong ... not least the gender !!!

I did quite clearly state that I was away abroad, which I regularly do, I spend time annually in Puerto Penasco and that I was a granny again ... so sorry 9/11, it was more that REAL LIFE got in the way than any fantasy of yours that I am in your (NOT MY) ebil gubmints employ.

WHY do you lot all think that there is some plot against you ... are you really that insignificant in the real world that you need "pretend" your ebil gubmint has need to spend time and money arguing against the mere handfuls of you on some small forum site ???

 

Yup PBL ... back again, so how many smelly socks is it this time now ...

PeaceBeautyLove, Michael Collins, RoryMac, PatrickPearse, mendoza, Bonardi, TheGreatGatsby, Controller, whistleblower, chimera ... there are a few I have missed out too ...

 

Is this at the same time as you were a banker in Milan ???

 

I love how truthers, when it is convenient for them, believe nothing should change including people. I am guessing it is because they have such limited personal interaction and when they do it isn't good. Just a theory.

 

More obvious bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lies from now a known, proven liar. Your heros, Al Qaeda, were responsible for far more deaths in the Middle East.

I noticed you ran from your last lie that Al Qaeda is never mentioned in Iraq. Most truthers run when they are confronted with obvious evidence they lied their ass off.

You're dismissed.

 

So because you're delusional and "think" it was allowed to happen that this is somehow proof it was allowed to happen? That is retarded!

And your point is? Still waiting for ANYTHING that actually backs up your bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

Kennedy's assassination could be done with a very limited number of people in on the conspiracy. According to truther theories, you would have to have thousands to tens of thousands of people involved in the planning, preparation, execution and coverup of the attack. More truths you will run from.

 

Because you're claims are based on pure lunacy! How is that not obvious to everyone? Oh wait. It is. Pretending everyone is really the same is just that. Pretending. You're proving your claims are nothing but delusional rants that are nothing but lies.

 

I watched it and you're right- hahahahaha- it's a joke. In other words, it is not to be taken seriously as I don't; neither do I take you.

 

So there were 10,000s of MUSLIMS involved in the planning, preparation, execution of 911?

Any reason why only ONE mentally backward little patsy has ever been charged with crimes relating to 911?

Strange that one.... don't you think?

Personally I believe that 911 could have been carried out with a very small number of senior military, CIA and government .. knowing the big picture.

 

I am fluent in French and Italian... However I prefer to converse in my mother tongue.. English.

Any chance you could accomodate me by writing in English?

Thanks.

 

Sure you are PBL ... sure you are !!!

 

Logical fallacy. A very small group can accomplish something when their enemy is not expecting it. It takes a massive group to pretend it was the small group and cover their tracks. This is simple common sense, but I'm not surprised it is over your head.

Strange that you would lie? No, you've proven time and time again you're perfectly willing to lie. One person has been convicted. Numerous people, including KSM who admits his and others' role in the attack, have been charged.

Uh huh. And your opinion isn't worth (*)(*)(*)(*) as you've already demonstrated. Could they carry it out? Yes. Could they cover it up? Not a snowball's chance in hell.

 

Nice way to completely avoid the point. I guess that was because you knew that once again you got your ass handed to you once it was pointed out that people change. Well, sucks to be you. Have fun talking to yourself in whatever language you next dream up you can speak.

 

Posted 02-22-2012, 06:15 AM

Times up.

 

Yes I am afraid I waited a reasonable amount of time in the middle of a 9/11 conspiracy thread to see there is no conspiracy. I dismiss the topic and was right in my initial estimation that there is no conspiracy.

 

Yeah, I think mollywhacker and I forget the most recent one.

He/She/It has a pretty recognizable writing style.

 

WHAT?!?! This can't be! You mean to tell me that despite the repeated claims of tons of evidence we never look at, not ONE piece of evidence was ever presented by a truther? Color me SHOCKED!

It must truly suck being a truther and knowing not one piece of real evidence actually exists to back up their bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims. To compound their misery, they still can't agree on any particular theory. They can't agree on who did it, what they did, how they did it, when they did it, or how they covered it up. Most truthers are so tired of getting their asses handed to them that they will no longer even state exacly what theory they believe in, and the few that stick with a theory eventually run away because they can't answer the hard questions that would have to have answers for their theories to be true. How pathetic is that?

As wrong as he was, I at least had a little respect for Scott because he at least stood up for what he believed in. He couldn't defend it. He had no evidence. But, until he ran away, he remained steadfast in his beliefs.

Look at suede and RWF's latest attempt. Everyone knows they don't think Flight 93 crashed there, but they know they can't even come close to proving that. So what do they do? They pretend they will have some small meaningless victory if they can prove the claim that part of Flight 93 was buried in the crater was wrong. Unfortunately for them, they can't even do that not so simple little task. The best they can do is claim that evidence good enough to convict a man to life in prison was not an engine from Flight 93. Their evidence? Their own retarded opinions.

Suede's utter failure at refuting Wally Miller's testimony was even more pathetic. He tried to pretend that if Wally Miller was in a position to see any plane parts in the hole, that it would have been reported since, according to him, reporters were hanging on Wally's every move, anxiously awaiting him to do something they could report on. That was his BEST attempt at discrediting Wally Miller's testimony.

Like I said. Pathetic.

 

Early cromagnon idiotic? Just like the rest of the truthers, he/she/it makes lots of claims he/she/it can't back up. I especially love how he/she/it pretends to have first hand knowledge that, of course, nobody could possibly verify.

 

Absolute BS. The very small group could have been "handled" by a similarly small group. Just like the CIA do all the time... for example when they invented AL QAEDA.

19 muslim dwarfs needed some serious assistance... and they got it.

 

Why not?

We are talking about a handful of people who knew the big picture.

Strange things happened to US defences on 911 and in the months leading up to it.

People were pulling strings.

The CIA "muslim dwarfs" were protected every step of the way.

 

Well at least you have not been waiting TEN YEARS... like myself and millions of other educated, non gullibles.. to be offered ONE piece of evidence to link a giant beardy bogeyman who lives in a cave...to 911.

You love to believe in bogeymen with ZERO evidence... is that because you are a FOx cartoon viewer by any chance?

 

More unsubstantiated bull(*)(*)(*)(*) from you. What.... we're just suppose to believe you after all the lies you've told already?

The really funny part is NOW you're claiming it was 19 muslims whereas before you were claiming there was no evidence of any muslims. Way to step all over yourself, genius. You can't even get your own lies straight.