Biden Calls on Congress to Strengthen Gun Ownership Rules

It always amuses me when people talk about a safe neighborhood. In most cases "safe neighborhood" or "safe school" is a code phrase if you get my drift and I think you do.

And secondly wealthy homes in "good neighborhoods" are subject to some pretty violent home invasions.

But what the [deleted] please continue to live in "condition white". But don't ask me to.

 

Do you even live in the US? I don't think so because every FFL purchase in the US requires a NICS check.

 

Yes, obviously. What's your point? It's one background check, as I clearly showed with the link you provided. You said two. It's not two.

 

Not a Trump supporter. I don't speak in code. Whites are a minority in my neighborhood, which is working class. I've lived here for 14 years, so I think I'm qualified to know whether it's safe. I've never seen the cops called. Of course I'm at work 3 and 4 days a week, but in 14 years, you'd think I'd see a squad car at some point. Don't lock my doors. Don't lock my vehicles. You can call that "the most dangerous hood the world has ever seen" if you like. I live here. You don't.

 

As I understand the Biden proposal people who had a Background check when they bought a semi-auto rifle will require a 2nd (and additional) background check and registration of the weapon ($200 per weapon) according to NFA requirements that currently exist for full auto firearms.

You may think you will never need a semi-auto rifle and I hope you never do. But it is better to have one and not need it than need it and not have it.

 

The liberal authorities will selectively enforce the proposed laws based on the liberal authority's identity politics. These gentlemen will get a pass, because they happen to belong to a liberal-approved identity group.

 

are you forgetting about the Girandoni "assault" rifle that Thomas Jefferson had? It was a .46 caliber held 22 shots and you could shoot all 22 shots before a musket could get its second shot off.. The founding fathers knew about assault rifles

 

So basically, you (as is usual) don't have jack **** to contribute when you realize the agenda you align with has zero logic and makes no sense in reality.

So you retort some snide remark, deflect from the original conversation, and pretend to yourself that you validated your backwards illogical political ideology.

Got it.

 

You're whining about the process. Nobody is forcing you to do this. Stop whining, and I won't make snide remarks. You sound like a big baby. Hence, the 12 year old comment. All very logical.

I don't have an agenda. What I have is a P38. Nobody is coming for it. I don't whine about the laws I have to follow to keep it.

 

The 19th century Gatling gun was the best. I think you got my point.

 

That's a common phrase that most gun-grabbing liberals say quite often about this subject.

When you are more "schooled" on the subject, perhaps that's when you will be able to make an intelligent comment on the subject.

 

Bizarre post.

I have a Walther P38. I support the 2nd Amendment. Not a liberal.

I think you're late for class.

 

There must be something about "inalienable rights granted by our creator" that is too difficult for you to understand?

Are those 6 words confusing?

Is "shall not be infringed"... do you want me to break down each word meaning?

And now, Constitutional Rights can be impeded and taken away through "processes".

Oh bullshit. You're one of the biggest liberals on this site, pretending to be a moderate.

You can dismiss my issues as whinning, or dismiss the original story all you want. Quite honestly, it just makes you look like an ass. If you're just going to dismiss everybody that expresses concerns, why not just be quiet? Do you think calling people names and being dismissive proves something?

Nobody is suddenly like "well, he said it was a non issue, so I guess he is right and I'll just move along". Nobody.

You're not really contributing, you're pretty much just being an ass.

 

LMAO

yes, sir. You are a liberal. You couldn't make it any clearer since your short time on this forum.

Owning a weapon original manufactured before WWII doesn't suddenly lend credibility to your position.

I can see your really struggling with this "debate" concept. Sticking your fingers in your ears, screaming "im right! And you're stupid" just makes you look unintelligent.

Do better.

 

Stop. Don't bring my parents into it, and just stop. I don't care that you don't like it. I don't like waiting either. Nobody does. The adults among us deal and move on, like adults do. You're crying like a baby because you have to wait. Just stop.

 

The government has no right to prevent me from my constitutional right to carry my weapon on my belt as I see fit.

What if it was 2 years, 20 years?

Just process right? Follow the rules that violate the constitution.

 

More inanity. I got the gun in 1978, for a song. Your opinion of it, like your opinion of anything else, is not something I care about.

All you know about me is that I oppose Trump. To you, that means I'm a communist. So, we get in a thread about the 2nd Amendment, which I've always supported, which is not a communist position, and what? I'm lying? I'm really a gun grabber incognito? Because of the model of my luger? How pitifully pathetic. Just ignore my posts, k?

 

Lol.

You support the 2nd amendment, so long as you follow the rules of government that infringes ability to own a weapon.

Really?

 

No truer words have ever been posted on the internet.

 

Will these bans on these “weapons of war” include cops or are we just calling them “weapons of war” but really mean “firepower we only want the state to have over civilians to better keep people in line and unable to fight back against brutality.”

 

So when I refuse to register or hand over my already purchased property (so called “weapons of war”), no cops armed with those very same “weapons of war” (because you lie about them “only belonging in war” by allowing the same cops you protest for killing people to keep guns the left regularly claim are just for killing people) and take my expensive property (assuming they can find it, as we don’t have registration in Missouri or a law that says we need to records when or if we sold those guns we may or may not still have privately (Womp Womp Womp can’t prove we keep them and buried them somewhere else)?

 

If you want a reply you're going to have to whittle that down. Makes no sense as written.

 

"Weapons of war" is political rhetoric. It's meaningless in a discussion like this.

I'd prefer police be less militarized, but I see no problem with cops having guns. Whether their guns are more "warlike" seems irrelevant to their numbers, which is their strength.

 

Anyone smart enough to live in a state that has no registration already and no need to provide proof of sale in private sales should immediately decide which guns will be their official guns and which will be their off home property stored guns.

Even if the ATF goes through all the gun store forms filled out, they can’t prove your “I sold them” story wrong and you can’t be locked up for contempt because you can’t prove a negative.

“Dang it, I wanted to hand over my semiautomatic weapons and be at the mercy of a better armed state that gets protested for police brutality, but I up and sold them all. Dang it.”

Plus, it is an insurance policy against red flag laws. The left writes them so loosely that you get disarmed (guilty until proven innocent), by any hearsay accusation some anti gun person makes up. This way, they show up unannounced and only get what you left in the house. Fooled them.

 

Sounds like no one but you (Meaning no one in local, state, or federal guberment) knows that you bought/own/possess that weapon. You're good with what you have so others should be as well. Hell, if you lived in the ****ed-up state I live in, you currently don't even qualify to go out and legally purchase ammunition for that little pea-shooter that you have. We have a right to decide what we want and/or need in a firearm(s) and the guberment does not. It says so in the U.S. Constitution.

No one who has seen your posts would say that you're not a Communist.
Communists own guns as well. Like in the old Soviet Union. They had guns. Just not those that may be necessary to protect you and/or your family or others. Europeans and Australians own guns as well. See what happens to most of them when they try to use them when their house is getting invaded.
And, yes. You are a liberal and a gun grabber. But you're not incognito or lying. You just don't know what you're talking about and can't see that you're like that.
Pitifully pathetic for sure.