'Blatantly unconstitutional': 78 members of Congress go to court against Biden

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by XXJefferson#51, May 10, 2021.

  1. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Seventy-eight members of Congress have gone to court to say that President Biden's "American Rescue Plan" is "blatantly unconstitutional" because it purports to control the decisions states make regarding their own taxes.

    The friend-of-the-court brief was filed by the American Center for Law and Justiceon behalf of the members of Congress in a case already pending that was brought by 13 attorneys general.




    https://www.wnd.com/2021/05/78-members-congress-tell-court-biden-doesnt-control-state-taxes/






    It is great to see the states standing up for their rights under our constitution. This bill is a clear federal over reach of its powers. That some of the federal leaders are siding with the states is a positive development. I expect that the courts will side with the states on this one.
     
    ButterBalls, glitch and JET3534 like this.
  2. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I am glad that the ACLJ is getting involved. They have a very good case about Congress over stepping constitutional bounds relating to the states in crafting this legislation.
     
    ButterBalls and JET3534 like this.
  3. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, sure they do. Why don't you explain it to us.
     
    Indlib likes this.
  4. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,316
    Likes Received:
    39,261
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yep the States need to exert their authority over their own matters. States have sovereignty the Federal Government can only involve itself it those matters the States allow it to.

    Another reason we need to repeal the 17th Amendment and give the States back their voice in the Congress so they can stop this nonsense.
     
    ButterBalls and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  5. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I wouldn’t need to do that for anyone who actually read the rest of the linked article. It’s all there.
     
    ButterBalls and JET3534 like this.
  6. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,039
    Likes Received:
    63,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ""it may not impose conditions so intrusive that it amounts to coercing the states to do its will.""

    funny, I remember republicans forcing my state to raise the age to buy alcohol or the fed would deny money for our roads

    now I will agree it's wrong of the fed to do this, but this is business as normal for republicans it seems

    it's ironic that later they elected Bush, a drunk driver to be their President
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2021
  7. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The feds have been using federal highway funds to persuade states on certain driving related issues for at least 50 years. From the national 55 mph speed limit to seatbelt laws to motor cycle helmets, to drunk driving fighting measures like you mentioned. Those though don’t commandeer state resources or fiscal decisions. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not compel states to spend money on Obamacare Medicaid expansion. Telling states they can’t cut taxes for four years is another such overreach.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  8. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol. Good ol' Jeff. I don't care about the article. I want to see if you do. You don't either, obviously.
     
  9. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree with the article on this issue completely. It states things clearly enough so that me adding my 2 cents worth beyond what I already said couldn’t make it any more clear.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  10. Darth Gravus

    Darth Gravus Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2021
    Messages:
    10,715
    Likes Received:
    8,017
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So, the Fed Govt is giving the states money and they are telling them what they cannot use that money for.

    How is that different than anything else the Feds do?
     

Share This Page