As a guy, I don't have much of a preference. I guess if someone put an illegally-obtained gun to my head and said pick one, I'd probably go with brunette, although not by much. How hot a girl is and what color her eyes are are much more important to me. Hahah
This results from the fact that women have demonized the very nature of men. For us to appreciate certain features is "sexist". Of course the straw man is this: The ability to appreciate blonde hair or big boobs or long legs is not objectification. But many women want to define it as such. Objectification is to only see blonde hair or big boobs or long legs. The other straw man was to ask if you judge men this way. Well, no, unless you are attracted to men you probably haven't. The question shows a complete lack of ability to discern sexual attraction, from having a male friend. And this is because sexual attraction in men for women has been demonized and labeled objectification. This is all especially comical because we are supposed to appreciate women for who they are. It is all a part of the hypocrisy of feminism, mainly from the 70s - 90s And in a nutshell, this is why I prefer sugar babies to a "meaningful relationship" with a woman my age.
Here is another interesting bit of insight: A survey taken at a major dating site, not sure which one now, showed that on the average, women rated about 2/3 of men on the site to be below average. By definition, only 1/2 of the men could be below average.
@HereWeGoAgain Nice and thoughtful post! I really cannot see any reason for anyone to lose their head over this harmless and light-hearted topic. ChrisL is usually a very nice and composed poster who never uses slurs or other childish behaviours, but as soon as beauty is the topic, she starts taking things waaaaaay too seriously. She did the same in a previous thread ("is beauty objective?" or something like that). :/
Maybe I got you confused with someone else, but people are and do stereotype women based upon their hair color . . . obviously! It's silly though.
The middle one has a very distinct appearence indeed. Swedes will prolly recognise her from the film Lilja 4ever. I think she is really cute. I do agree that the one in the top picture is the most beautiful of the three, but I do not agree the bottom one is "too skinny"; I prefer skinny girls as I, myself am a skrony, skeletal bag of bones.
None of them are ugly. I've never seen the middle one before. I think the last one would look better if she gained a little weight.
Her name is Oksana Akinshina. She's a Russian actress. Apparently she had a role in Bourne Supremacy too (cannot recall that. ) Meeeeh.
Anyways, my nordicist preference for light skin, light eyes and light hair most likely is the result of being born and raised in Sweden. Perhaps it would have been different if I was from Southern Europe. In my world, Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish and Russian women are the most beautiful in the world.
Because she happens to be tanned on that picture. With "light skin" I mean that I am not much for the darker skin of Latinas, girls from MENA and other Sicilian-esque looking girls.
Well any woman that wants me to help with her Buttons. I'm in like Our Man Flint. That being said.....my first marriage was a blonde with Hazel/Green eyes. When she got angry her eyes would turn green. No kiddin. Mortgage Underwriter. But she used to be a brunette. She was also the mother of my two sons. Didn't last to long. 9 years/7 married. Then I met the Ole Lady.....Blond, blue eyes like Sapphires. Long legs. She is 5'8. 17 years together, 13 married. Teacher. Don't know what it is, although I am Sicilian and tan all year long. So I stand out better.
This is not true, it is just a myth that hazel-eyed people can change their eye colour. Depending on the lighting, their eyes can look green or brown or yellow-ish, but they don't really change colour per se.
[/QUOTE] HAHA! That's one of my favorite videos. The woman at 2:18 is almost identical to my second sugar baby.