BOB GOODLATTE FULL ONE-ON-ONE INTERVIEW WITH SEAN HANNITY (1/25/2018)

Rush has been a notable liar. Again, if you wish to trust him fine, but if you take what he says as truth you are straying from reality.

 

JW is suing too.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press...update-judicial-watch-sues-fbi-text-messages/

 

Republicans are going to do just that despite Democrats objections

 

In other words you can't actually tell us any Rush lies but you know he's a liar because everyone on the left says so

 

But you refused to prove it when I offered up a simple opportunity to do so.

How many more times do you want to show yourself to be both ignorant and incapable?

If you don't want to substantiate your claim then be on your way son.

You've lost, just accept it and move on.

 

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rush-limbaugh/
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rush-limbaugh/statements/byruling/barely-true/

This is from a really quick Google, so take your time.

 

I wonder if Strzok & Co. will be offered deals because spoliation of evidence is appears to have occurred and that means felony charges for people who don't have the political muscle that Hillary did.

 

This is from a really quick Google, so take your time

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapo...n-under-obamacare-it-rated-true/#30bace67c144

http://thefederalist.com/2016/12/16/running-data-politifact-shows-bias-conservatives/

 

Brilliant analysis.

 

"all mostly false statements involving rush Limbaugh"

Total of 10 from 2009-2017.

The guys on the radio 5 days a week, not to mention other appearances, books, misc publications.

So out of what is potentially hundreds of thousands or even millions of statements, politifact found 10 that are "mostly false".

By the numbers that's a nearly perfect record.

And then I look at some of these and I see three opinions, and so I don't know how one could rule true/false opinion so technically it should be at 7, right?

 

I know he is a liar because years ago I listened to him and figured that out. Also most people know rush lives in his own little juiced up world of oxy paranoia and hallucinations. That has been true for decades and has not changed. If he has something that is correct then let him show the actual source and not describe it to us. I can do without the drama.

 

You need to take more time and peruse the second link. You are welcome.

 

Care to point me in the right direction?

I see 10 line items, "page 1 of 1".

What am I missing?

 

Rush Limbaugh is not a reliable source. It's like using Alex Jones.

 

Rush is not the guy to be relying on for fair and balanced. Find a better source and transcript. You don't get to propagandize here with those who know better.

 

We're on a subject.

I suggested a poster check out some radio shows to hear more on the subject.

The poster said "nah its all lies that dumb people believe".

I said "ok here's a transcript of a segment on the subject, can you highlight the lies.

The poser refused multiple times.

I didn't "propagandize" anything.

I made my point with supporting materials and asked somebody who had a different opinion to make their point with the same, they didn't want to.

 

The left here have been taught by George Soros to attack the source to put out stories against their side.

 

I'm well aware of these left wing fact checks sites and their convoluted processes in deeming opinions as lies.

 

This is the Fox News effect in full force.

You now claim as fact some conspiracy theory that Obama somehow changed the rules and spied on everyone, and has everyeon listening to the current administration and spying on them.

Hols sh1tballs batgirl. The crazy on the right has reached new levels.

 

Seems like Trump was George Soros' best student if that is the case.

 

I'm glad you recognize Rush, Hannity, etc. are trash Opinion shows and not reliable sourcing.

 

Yeah, discrediting every institition of our government to stop a story was Soros idea........bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You may want to reference the Nunes memo for clarity on your position.....

 

The subject was a San hannity interview though. An interview with a named source as opposed to all the left wing media so called news with anonymous sources.

 

Neither claims to be news shows and both say they have opinions and a political bias. I'll take that over left wing opinion and bias fake news shows masquerading as hard unbiased news.

 

Yup its classic mental warfare.

Convince your people they are "educated and informed" if they accept what ABC is telling them.

Then attack what XYZ is saying and convince your people that the ones who are listening to XYZ are "uneducated and uninformed".

They'll develop ego driven behavior that seeks out the gratification you provide (almost like a drug addiction) while simultaneously also developing gratification from mimicking your example in attacking XYZ which in turn creates a knowledge vacuum.

End result: Your people have been brainwashed into thinking that the rejecting of information is how one becomes informed.