Brutal jewish child-killer still living in New York — and shows no remorse

I've only seen one of his threads...the one I saw was immediately turned into a Jew bashing thread, and some even said they as Christians were "superior".

Generally, there seem to be far more white male conservative Christian racists on this forum than any other demographic...I was even informed of that by someone here...this is "their" turf.

But if Guno is just doing the same thing in reverse as Forum Poster, than that's just as bad.

So where is your indignation in this and all the other Forum Poster threads?

 

I'd say a few take the time to condemn you and your posts, a few unfortunately take the time to support your posts...

but it seems most simply ignore...and I can see why....these threads of yours are just a trash bin of hate and stupidity....

I suppose I'll ignore, too, although I think letting this kind of hate exist at all...the way the world seems to be heading starting with Trump....doesn't seem like a good idea...

 

Really? Is that why my thread "Non-Jews should not be allowed to live in Israel - Israel's Chief Rabbi" has 649 replies and 27,448 views? Is that why my thread "They won't admit it in Stockholm, but Donald Trump is right about immigration in Sweden" has 461 replies and 9,451 views?

No, you won't. We both know that.

 

Tell you what, Brewskier. Tomorrow, I'll go through the most recent 5 pages of Latest US & World News, Current Events and Political Opinions & Beliefs. I'll look at the threads created by Guno vs the threads created by ForumPoster and compare how many are explicitly anti-white vs explicitly anti-Jewish. I'll also look at their individual profiles for the first five pages of their most recent activity and do the same. I'll let you know how it goes.

 

Regardless of your ability to recall things, this is actually the 3rd thread of his you've participated in. Here are the other two:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...mmunity-service.471114/page-2#post-1066572173

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/jewish-professor-jews-try-to-weaken-america-by-moral-subversion.505304/page-2#post-1067918812

That last one was only last week. I would think you would have remembered something so recent.

 

Why wait?

Going back to September 1st ForumPoster has created 12 threads that are about Jews or Israel. I count 64 threads created that are either anti-white or anti-Christian since September 1st from Guno (there may be more). You participated in 3 of the 12 threads ForumPoster created, and exactly 0 of the threads that Guno created.

Could it be possible that, as a Jew, you take more offense to so-called "anti-Semitic" threads created by non-Jews, and give threads created by Jews that are critical of whites and Christianity a complete pass? Because that seems to be what is happening in your thread history. It's OK to have a bias. What I don't like is the fake claims of neutrality.

 

I've already explained at least half a dozen times that I don't care about criticizing religion. Criticize Judaism all you want. I. Don't. Care. I do it too. I've criticized the Jewish scriptures more than I've criticized any other religious text. But you need to muddy the waters I guess.

I went to both of their profiles and looked at five pages of their posts, and there is no rational comparison. No honest, thinking human being can come away from that thinking that Guno is as anti-white as ForumPoster is anti-Jewish. And "so-called"? Really? ForumPoster has tagged his own threads as anti-semitic . . . using the literal tag "anti-semitism." No intellectually honest human being can bury their head far enough into the sand to pretend that his primary purpose on the site isn't to preach anti-semitism. That's his right, and I haven't seen him breaking any forum rules while doing it, but pretending it is anything less than that is abject insanity.

As far as your armchair psychology goes, most of my heritage is German and Scottish. If Guno honestly has a categorical problem with white people as a whole, he has a problem with me.

 

Oh really? I just showed that in the last 3 months Guno has posted easily 5 times more threads against whites than ForumPoster has against Jews. Even if I removed the very few threads where Guno refers to JUST Christians, and not specifically "white Christians", he is posting far, far more anti-white threads than ForumPoster is posting anti-Jewish threads. It's not even comparable. Even if we take just the last 5 pages as an example, that takes it back just a few weeks in time. ForumPoster has posted exactly 6 threads on his subject, while Guno has 13 specifically anti-white threads. And, unlike ForumPoster, Guno will commonly appear in other people's threads as well, not just his own. He has made over 100 comments since November 1st in different threads about whites.

I'll have to let him answer for himself as to why he includes specific tags on his threads. My guess is that it's a way for others to find his content, since "anti-Semitism" is going to be a popular and controversial term that might be searched for often. Whether he agrees with the accusation that he is pushing "anti-Semitism" or not, I have no idea.

No, I don't think he does, for the reason I cited.

 

No, you didn't. You just asserted it.

I think this probably has something to do with your bar for what constitutes "anti-white."

Specifically about the white population or just about people who are white?

In what alternate reality would his posts not constitute anti-antisemitism?

The reason you cited was self-contradictory. If he has a problem with white people as a whole, he has a problem with me. It isn't even a complex observation . . . it is a tautology.

 

That's because it's easily verifiable to anyone who wants to check it themselves. Go into the profiles of each poster and click the "information" tab. Then click the "find all threads by" link. It lists them all, from most recent to oldest. Go back to whatever date you want. At no point is your argument correct.

I would consider a thread "anti-white" if it is specifically made against just white people and is negative towards them. What is your bar?

I realize you're trying to obfuscate, but what's the difference?

Here's a small collection from just the last couple of weeks. Feel free to find comments from ForumPoster that are this inflammatory.

I'll let him speak for himself on this question.

He has a problem with you, yet you have yet to post in any of his threads and confront him about it? You're now trying to identify as white, but in previous threads you've identified as a Jew, and you're clearly upset about ForumPoster making references to Jews on this forum, which is why you've confronted him about it in several threads. Guno does this far more often to your "mostly white" ancestry, and you've given him a pass. Why?

You're not being honest about your motivations, and you're not objective. I'm pointing out this obvious truth.

 

do you think new york has a powerful jewish lobby which protects jewish criminals?

some of the richest jews, catholics, and protestants live there.

 

Or I could use the forum's search function. I search for how many posts Guno has made about "white christian" and I get 6 pages of results. I search for how many "Jewish" posts FP has made and I get 18 pages of results . . . three times as many, and that's with Guno being active on the forums for longer than FP has been active. For even more fun, try for all of the threads created with the "jew" or "jewish" tags . . . more than 90% of these threads were created by FP.

I think that's a pretty good bar, if the express purpose is to be negative toward them as a whole.

It is the difference a post being explicitly anti-white and a post that says something negative about a white individual without highlighting their race as a factor. Kind of like the difference between posting negative things about the black population vs posting something negative about Jessie Jackson without so much as mentioning his race.

Thanks for bringing those to my attention I guess.

You realize he has an entire thread devoting to insulting the appearance of Jewish women, yes?

Cool, then since what someone posts doesn't matter, I'll just ask Guno directly if he hates white people and then just dismiss everything you've said if he says "no." Dude, if you can read, you can see he's being anti-semitic.

I've never been in a thread where he has expressed any problem with me. Guess I'll just have to ask him. Which is it, are people's posts evidence enough or do we just let them tell us whether they are being racist or not? The double standard thing is a little too much, so please make up your mind.

And in previous threads I've identified as white. Because I am part white and part Jewish. It isn't complicated. In fact, you tried using my whiteness against me in an argument in the past when it came to my religion

"Referencing" Jews? Dude, you've just taken double speak to a whole new plane of existence.

I only see two threads where I have.

Nice try, but no, he hasn't.

Why did I engage QChan in his anti-white rants, both in the forums and in PMs, and help get him banned?

You are pointing out your armchair psychology. Now, please feel free to choose: are we going to judge people based on their posts or let them tell us whether or not they are anti-X and then accept their answer unquestioningly?

 

Another movement of the goal posts. You originally wanted to look up how many threads each of them have created on their respective topics, and now you're going by the number of posts they have made.

But your methodology is flawed, regardless. Searching for "white Christian" will only bring up posts where those two words are written right next to each other, in that order. If you switched the words around to "Christian white", it would only bring up 2 posts. You'd get 18 pages if you searched for just "white", 16 pages for "Christian", and these aren't even including all of the slurs he has used. Over 20 uses of "cracka/cracker" that haven't been deleted (many have). 2 pages of "goy/goyim".

Here's a good one:

Again, feel free to find a similar post like this from ForumPoster against Jews. Use that search feature and show us, since you're such a master at it.

And another problem with your methodology is that it doesn't necessarily show how many times the posters have used the specific word you are searching for. Take this post, for instance:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ls-chief-rabbi.455694/page-28#post-1067414896

It comes up when searching for ForumPoster's usage of the word "Jewish", yet there is not a single use of the word "Jewish" in that post. Because of the tags associated with the thread itself, every post he makes in the thread will count as "Jewish", even when he isn't using the word.

That's only because he is one of the very few posters on this forum that consistently use the tags feature in the first place. I don't use them, and I've created more threads than he has. Just because more than 90% of the "tagged" threads on Jews are his doesn't mean he is creating over 90% of the threads on Jews.

Another qualifier? So if he is excluding a few whites from his thread, we can say the thread is not anti-white? Is that your next move?

Definitely the former is the case, here.

"I guess" there is no other response to these? Just trying to skate past them?

Wait, didn't you just say the "bar" is whether negativity is directed against an overall group and not just an individual? The thread I'm seeing of his that I believe you are referring to is the title of an article written in the Jewish Chronicle, a Jewish newspaper. The story is of a single Jewish woman who is debating whether or not to get surgery done because of the stereotype of Jewish features being ugly in the West.

Contrast that with the dozens of threads by Guno celebrating the decline of whites in the West (keeping those quotes I posted in mind as context). I ask again, which one is more inflammatory?

I'm sure ForumPoster has specific reason on why he posts these threads, but I won't attempt to answer for him. He likely will answer your questions directly, if he hasn't already.

He doesn't have a problem with you because you're Jewish, lol. Not hard to figure out at all.

That's before I knew you were Jewish. Before then your posts weren't making sense.

How is that double speak? ForumPoster talks a lot about Jews, that's no secret.

3. This one, and the two others I posted. 1+2=3.

I proved otherwise. See above.

I've never even heard of this person, and when searching for his posts, I find a lot of anti-homosexual posts from a Christian religious viewpoint. I suspect your opposition to him was based mostly on this and other social justice related issues, instead of his alleged anti-whiteness. We've already seen in this thread with your defense of Guno that anti-whiteness doesn't really bother you.

You can call it armchair psychology if you want. It doesn't keep me from building my case. Your mask slips a little more in every one of these exchanges.

 

When did I say that?

And we can find more from FP if we look up "Jews" instead of "Jewish." You were the one wanting to focus on the whole "white christian" thing. Also, when we look up just "white," it also brings up any posts about the "White House."

Lol, sorry dude, but you've dismissed me every time I've brought up deleted posts, so this isn't going to fly.

See previous observation about FP having an entire thread about ridiculing the appearance of Jewish women.

1) He's the one assigning those tags you are complaining about 2) . . . you are seriously going to sit here and pretend that "Jews" and "Jewish" are unrelated concepts? I mean, really?

Lol, and the fact that he started using these tags when virtually no one else did doesn't tell you anything about his obsession at all? Once again . . . really? Like, really really?

Look, if you really couldn't understand that last post, I'm not sure what else I can do to help you. Criticizing one white person is not a criticism of the entire white race. For yet another time, do you really not understand that? Like, really really?

That depends. Do we judge writers based on their posts or do we take a pass and just say we will suspend judgement and let them speak for themselves? I asked you this in my last post and you avoided it like the plague.

Read the rest of the thread and see what FP posts. Look at the tags he's assigned. Still think it is just about one woman? Like, really really?

That depends: do we let them answer for themselves or judge them based on the words they've already written? How long are you going to continue avoiding this question?

But you are eager to answer for me and Guno. Funny, that.

Ah, so you are saying we shouldn't judge him by what he has written and instead just let him speak for himself . . . which you refuse to do in the case of myself and Guno.

Part Jewish and part white. There's your contradiction again.

I told you at the time that I was only part white, but you chose to focus on that because it was convenient for your argument at the time. You've never shied away from speaking for other forumites in the past; why do you suddenly shy away when the subject is a blatant anti-Semite?

What is the secret is how you manage to not notice those posts, taken as a whole, are anti-Semitic.

And yet again you confuse your assertions with "proof."

Qchan was explicitly anti-white. But you've obviously chosen a different cherry to pick.

You claim to have such insight . . . but can't identify a blatantly anti-semitic post even when its author uses tags like "blood libel" and "anti-semitism". The contradictions are baffling.

 

Right here:

Which has absolutely nothing to do with my criticism of your methodology of using the specific search term for "white Christian". The point is that he has made many posts against whites, Christians, and white Christians that were not included in your search for "white Christian".

Which are in the minority of posts he has made while using the term "white".

Feel free to search for "cracka" and "cracker" in his search history. Over 20 uses. No surprise you tried to bypass this. My point about the deleted posts is only that he has used the term far more than 20 times. How many uses of this slur are you willing to give him a pass on?

Already addressed. But even assuming FP believes Jewish women are ugly, is that really just as bad, or worse, than actively celebrating a group in society dying and becoming a minority? Can you even answer that honestly, I wonder?

1) I'm not complaining about the tags. 2) I'm doing no such thing, and I have no clue how you jumped to that conclusion. I am pointing out why your "I'll just use the search engine" method is not effective in making the arguments you are trying to make. You claimed FP used the term "Jewish" more than Guno uses the term "White Christian", and the fact that FP uses tags in his threads causes every single post in those threads to come up with a separate instance of "Jewish". That's a problem in your methodology that harms your ability to make your argument. That's all I'm pointing out.

I don't see how using tags somehow makes someone more obsessive than someone who doesn't use tags.

You said it would be anti-white if he referred to white people "as a whole". That opens the door for you to say "well, he isn't including this white person, or these white people, so it's not the "whole" group". That's exactly the kind of hedging that I would expect.

Predictable dodge. You can't (openly) defend those posts of his and respond without acknowledging that I am correct, so you just avoid them and move on to the next point.

So FP thinking most Jewish women are unattractive is more offensive and inflammatory than what I've shown from Guno? Yes or no?

Another dodge. You've already judged him so what would it matter? What you haven't done yet is rendered an opinion on Guno and the multiple anti-white posts that I've presented. Why are you continuing to dodge those? You initially tried to act like they weren't explicitly anti-white, but now that you see that they are, what are you thoughts about them?

You've already judged him, as I just explained. Why are you ignoring Guno's posts? Surely you must have some opinion on them?

It's not a contradiction at all.

I'm not shying away from it, I'm inviting him to explain himself, here in his own thread. I'm interested in seeing what he has to say. From what I remember he has never really shied away from explaining himself when asked. Guno has been asked to explain himself many times and hasn't, so we can only come up with our own conclusions as to his motivation. I think it's pretty clearly anti-white and anti-Christian, but what do you think? You don't seem able to make a decision one way or the other. Why is that?

But how was what I said "double speak"?

I've shown that Guno creates more anti-white threads than FP creates anti-Jewish threads, which is the exact opposite of your argument. This is easily verifiable using the methodology I posted, but not the methodology you posted (which is flawed, as I have shown).

Guno is explicitly anti-white, and you haven't ever called him out on it. QChan may or may not have been anti-white, but he was explicitly anti-homosexual, and explicitly a Christian, based on the several posts of his I looked up. If you want, I can find some posts of yours that are pro-homosexual and anti-Christian, which should be enough to cause a reasonable person to suspect that those are the issues you took issue with him on, not his anti-whiteness.

Again, I don't know why he uses tags in his threads in this way. I suspect it's so he can more easily find them in the future (as you said, 90% of them are his), but I would want him to answer that specific question for himself.

 

Yardmeat seems to assume that if a poster starts threads about news stories that involve jews, they're automatically "antisemitic". Well, I disagree. I have never used racial/ethnic slurs against jews on this forum, I have never advocated violence against them, and I have never claimed that all the jews in the entire world are evil, crooked, perverted, etc. I simply post excerpts from well-known jewish newspapers and news sites, like Haaretz, Times of Israel, The Jewish Week, etc., and then ask my fellow PF members a few questions about that particular news story to get a discussion going.

Now, compare that to the behavior of my pro-jewish opponents. These people show up in my legitimate threads and post off topic garbage and hurl foul insults at me, like calling me "ignorant racist scum", "a pile of excrement", "an antisemitic swine", "a poor excuse for a human being", etc., and saying that I'm a closet homosexual, that I have sex with goats and that I was molested by my parents. I have never done that to my opponents, yet Yardmeat seems to believe that I'm worse than they are. How does one respond to such nonsense? Seriously?

Bobby Joe wrote:

Guno often hurls racial slurs at white/non-jewish people, and he insults/trolls other PF members. I have never done that. So no, we're definitely not doing the same thing.

Yardmeat wrote:

Brewskier already explained that:

"My guess is that it's a way for others to find his content, since "anti-Semitism" is going to be a popular and controversial term that might be searched for often."

That's what tags are for, Yardmeat.

Yardmeat wrote:

The thread that you're referring to is about an article from a well-known jewish newspaper in which a jewish journalist talks about the antisemitism she feels she encounters in society because of her jewish appearance, which she believes is ugly. If you have a problem with that topic, you should contact the journalist who wrote the article, Katie Grant, and complain to her. I'm sure that you can find her email address on the internet.

 

So we can't criticize groups that have created things? Why do you and Guno create so many threads against white people and Christians, then? How are you even able to do that on a computer if you're staying consistent with yourself?

 

.
Here's an article from People Magazine in which they mention that the killer was a jew, and the victim a Christian:

http://people.com/archive/cover-story-a-childs-death-a-mothers-torment-vol-34-no-8/

Oy gevalt, how dare they point that out! The journalists at People Magazine must be antisemites!