Climate Activist Greta

Some science is settled - sans getting into existential mindlessness - That said -... all of climate science is not part of the "settled" part.

 

"Does not" what ? Different organizations have different perspectives. Sure we can state that climate is changing with a good degree of certainty. .. OK .. so what ?

I would also claim that the vast majority of Scientists would claim that human activity is affecting climate - to some degree ... so what ?

This talk is all nonsense unless some relative perspective is added.

 

Not the republicans. They just sound like you.

 

Don’t try to explain yourself. It just gets worse.

 

Why are you posting gibberish ?

 

A post that again, indicates poster doesn’t even know what man made climate change is about.

 

More gibberish .. what in my post do you think shows that I don't know what man made climate change is about ?

 

The IPCC is a government created and funded body to specifically bolster the CO2 hypothesis.

 

“sans getting into existential mindlessness ”
If you don’t know what woo woo is, this quote exemplifies it perfectly.

 

It’s what you don’t say because you don’t get it.

 

That comment had nothing to do with climate change. It was addressing a comment stating that settled science does not exist.

What in my post shows that I do not know what man made climate change is about ?

 

You have a reference for this unfounded tripe.

 

I get it ... like how Polling is done.A Poll is taken knowing what they
want and need to spew or con the public about and then the poll is tweeked.
Same technique used in writing a Headline at The Washington Post or
New York Times.The Headline is made and then the needed smear
or negativity is filled in later.No 2 confirmed sources needed.No Journalist
reporting or proven facts necessary.

 

You continue to blubber unintelligible nonsense.. what is it that I "don't say". Part of my post was that I don't know what you are trying to argue ... and you certainly have not clarified in the post after. Just engaged in pointless name calling and you won't even state what part of my post offended you or what you are offended about.

 

How about the College of Preventive Medicine for one.

 

If you knew anything about the IPCC you would already know this.

 

You totally omit that climate change us about the acceleration in the rate change and effect on the evolution of each species affected by it. If all it was, is just about the climate changing, there would be no cause for alarm. Dah.

 

That’s pretty easy. There are hundreds of diseases that preventative medicine is dealing with that are exacerbated by climate change. This is just one.
https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/health/case_studies/lyme_disease.html

https://www.healthline.com/health/lyme-disease

 

I mean, of course it wasn't. But let's imagine that really was the secret nefarious purpose, and they really are the boogeyman working against the oil industry. They operate on a budget of like $10 million. The koch brothers alone have donated over $100 million.

 

LOL, sure. Of course that cannot be proven and especially since temperatures in the US have not changed for two decades but hey, everything is blamed on climate change today.

 

Uh, do you know what IPCC stands for? Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 100 million the Koch brothers donated when to many things and is a drop in the bucket compared to what the US has spent on it. Of course that is the usual tactic of the true believers that nefarious scientists are producing inconvenient science because of some conspiracy.

 

Congratulations, you just made my point. You don’t care about facts, you’re only interested in remaining a Republican tool.

 

Huh ?
“Science is never 100% settled - science is about narrowing uncertainty.”

 

That would be a quote from the OP (the topic being discussed)

 

I asked that some relative statement be given .. as one had not. Since I had no clue what you were trying to get at .. how could I omit something. You accusation makes zero sense.

You then make some dumb statements "if this was just about climate change - there would be no cause for alarm".. Of course climate change could be cause for alarm. What on earth are you talking about. If we had another ice age hit tomorrow .. would this not be cause for alarm ?

I agree that climate change appears to be accelerating .. what you omit is any reference to why you think this is the case. It is you who appears not to know what you are talking about.

I have written numerous posts in threads relating to climate explaining some facets of how climate change is measured and how it is accelerating.