Clinton’s advisers tell her to prep for a landslide

Who here honestly believes that Hillary wants to "get the money out of politics"?

She is the most repulsive political candidate in my memory. Worse than Nixon.

 

NO! She is indeed uneducated having testified to FBI that she was not taught to recognize and to deal with classified messages. So, at least in this case, you are wrong.

As for Hillary being congenial liar, I stand corrected, she's not congenial liar, just an inhospitable, unfriedly, disagreeble, unpleasant, unlikable liar. You're correct.

 

You are splitting hairs; factually she has at least two or more college degrees, so she is "educated"; your position that she is "uneducated" is strictly an opinion because she may be lacking in one area is just that; an opinion.

Thank you.

 

The fact that Hitlery is even being allowed to run shows anyone paying attention that we live in a banana republic. She was promised this job back in 2008 at the Bilderburg meeting in Chantilly Virginia if you would drop out of the race. She is thicker than thieves with the very banking oligarchs and Wall Street crowd that the Fabian socialist left claims to have such disdain for. She will be the next CEO of USA.INC and the little sheeple will jump up and down while this skank and thief is flying all over the country telling people that they need to curb their carbon footprint. This country is a friggin' Greek tragedy and it is filled with idiots...seriously. It is populated by a dumbed down public that has no clue about how the monetary system works, they have no clue about the real puppet masters that pull the strings. It's really hard to not be a snob knowing the things I do.

 

Splitting hair I am not, uneducated indeed she is. Look up the meaning of the word. But I'll give you a concession - she has not been educated in an area of confidential communication handling. Would that be better?

Which is a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing lie on her part, but we have already agreed she's a liar, haven't we?

 

Nice assessment of the current situation; you're absolutely correct on most points. Hopefully, the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing baggage she's carrying around will do her in before she's erected into the White House. Hopefully...

 

Because she is the only sane candidate running for President from a major party.

 

OK I will do the decent thing and ask you who you think are the puppet masters that pull the strings.

 

Of course it's a banana republic. It's been that way since, perhaps Nixon. Sorry, but you can't be completely corrupt and still remain the leader unless you are in a banana republic.

The fact that we've got another Clinton on the ticket is no different from the philippines having another Marcos on the ticket, or north korea having another kim in office.

 

That's much better and factual. Thank you.

 

How about the ones that control every central bank, the IMF (International Monetary Fund because I doubt that you understand what IMF stands for) the BIS (Bank of International Settlements because I doubt you know what "BIS" stands for) and the World Bank (that one is easy and self explanatory). The banking oligarchs that pull the stings, control politics and they control Hitlery . Are you familiar with the CFR? (Council on On Foreign Relations) and it's formation after the "League Of Nations failed and how that ties into the United Nations that was started after WWII? If not, you have some studying and research to do......let me know how I can help. I specialize on this topic.

 

Ahh, yeah, she just forgot the particular days the FBI was asking about.

Which is really convenient for her, isn't it?

You still didn't answer my question.

 

I don't blame her.

Pander to the dumbest you can. Claim everything is racist and everythingis bigoted and everything is unfair and tell people it's not their fault, but the fault of evil Republicans and every white person who doesn't feel ashamed for things they have nothing to do with.

No, you're right, that's the way to go. I don't blame her one bit. With a propaganda machine called news, and wealthy puppeteers that run the world finances, there was no chance she'd lose.

- - - Updated - - -

So you can't vote for Johnson cause he's not from a major party? Solid logic.

Had to work real hard for your vote. Lol

"Hillary, what's your platform?"

"I am part of a major party."

"Sold."

 

Why would anyone vote for Clinton? Because the alternative is the election of Donald Trump.

 

If you knew anything about US politics, you would realize that all successful runs for the Presidency for the last fifty years have been run by smart, tough operatives who concentrate on the ground game in key states. Clinton's campaign is being run by professionals. Trump's is being run by rank amateurs. If he had hired the right people after his amazing win in the primaries, he would be 10 points up at this point. The country is definitely ready for change but Trump and his team have not presented itself as a reasonable alternative. Too whacky and unpredictable.

 

If Trump were to win...I'd certainly be disappointed.

I do not "enrage."

I think American voters are too intelligent to give a majority to Donald Trump. But...it could happen.

 

Sorry but anyone who has been breathing for the last seventy years knows that unfortunatly voting for a third party candidate is just a waste of effort. Might as well stay home. Sorry it is that way but it just is. Now if they would put " None of the Above " on the ballot it might be actually possible to make a statement by voting without voting for a major party candidate.

 

Under the current circumstances it's impossible not to mention Trump's name when talking about why anyone would vote for Clinton. There simply are considerable amounts of people who consider everything Trump has said and stands for to be worse than anything Clinton has ever done or said. Of course lots of others feel the opposite, but it just is what it is.

 

What does he stand for that you dislike so much? And what could he stand for that's so bad and which Clinton hasn't already done? Almost every criticism launched at Trump backfires because Clinton probably did the same thing or worse while in office.

 

That's easy.

Donald Trump stands for Donald Trump........and nothing else.

That should be all you need to know.

 

He stands for ignorance.
There's not one single sentence that's come out of that guy's mouth to indicate that he's even remotely intellectual or knowledgeable about anything besides buying and selling real estate.

Hell, I'd sooner vote for Captain Kangaroo if he were the main opposition candidate against Trump.

 

Yes a landslide defeat for HER.
Get used to saying President Trump.

 

What exactly is it that you hate so much about the previous Clinton administration?

Was it the Peace or the Prosperity?

 

Hillary has nothing by way of a message than cries of racism and promises of freebies.

Other than that she's carrying the same rhetoric that Obama did, which she can do because he didn't fulfill any of it during his reign.

But more importantly, what Hilary does have is millions of clueless inept voters who simply don't care that she's a crooked corrupt criminal elitist Wall Street big bank 1%er who has spent her entire political career opposing eveything the Dems have spent the last eight years crying about.

Hillary isn't good for America she's just in a position to harness mass stupidity and the fetish that her voters having for the "D".

 

Promises of freebies=The Wall. It's the same thing. Only it appeals to a much larger segment of "the growing population"(inspite of the decline of the birth rate. How Liberals can POSSIBLY deny their desire for illegal immigration is beyond me. The statistics bare what we all know: They're using illegals for a political purpose.)

I think it'll take us 10-30 years to reverse a trend along the same timeline of the treason of the Democratic Party. Can Trump jumpstart the process? I don't know. I sure know Hillary has no interest in doing so.