Clue to Jews: The Left Hates You

Nobody likes Jews...

The Christian Right need God to dictate to support them no matter what. What does that tell you when it takes God to get people to like you?

 

Ann Coulter is pro-Israel. She is not anti-Jewish. She is on the side of the Jewish people.

A person shouldn't dismiss someone who fights for them. That is rude.

 

LOL, it is funny to see you say this while ignoring the left on this thread bashing Jews. Funny? Not really. Sad is more like it.

It is also the left that continues to concentrate dividing races through fomenting hatred. If you haven't learned by now, the left is all about hate and intolerance.

The right is Israel's biggest defender and the left generally thinks Jews are behind all the world's ills. Wake up dude.

 

Well.. you might look at the motives of the Christian Zionists and Dominionists ... (Conservatives)






http://www.politicalforum.com/science-technology/238065-elephants-arabia-7-million-years-ago.html

 

How do you know the right-wing doesn't hate Jews ?


Palin's "blood libel" charge ignites firestorm

Jan 12, 2011

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/12/us-usa-shooting-palin-idUSTRE70B3W320110112



Prominent Republican Sarah Palin defended her fiery rhetoric on Wednesday but ignited a fresh controversy by accusing critics of "blood libel" in linking her to a deadly Arizona shooting spree.

A defiant Palin, leaping into a roaring debate on the consequences of overheated political rhetoric, said her critics had been irresponsible in rushing to blame Saturday's gun rampage on vitriolic campaign speech.

"Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn," Palin, a potential 2012 White House contender, said in a video posted to her Facebook page.



Palin's reference to "blood libel," a false, centuries-old allegation that Jews were killing children to use their blood in religious rituals, launched a new round of criticism of Palin's rhetoric.

"We wish that Palin had used another phrase, instead of one so fraught with pain in Jewish history," said Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League.



The accusation of "blood libel" has been employed for centuries to justify the killing or expulsion of Jews.

The phrase had been used by other conservative commentators, including a Wall Street Journal column, since the shooting of Representative Gabrielle Giffords, who is Jewish.


"Perhaps Palin honestly does not know what a blood libel is, or does not know of their horrific history -- that is perhaps the most charitable explanation we can arrive at," said David Harris, president of the National Jewish Democratic Council.

Suspected Arizona gunman Jared Lee Loughner faces five federal charges in the weekend attack, including the attempted assassination of Giffords, who is in critical condition after being shot in the head while talking to constituents outside a Tucson supermarket.



The rampage fueled a growing debate about whether the heated partisan rhetoric featured in recent U.S. political campaigns can lead to violence, and politicians in both parties have suggested cooling the tone of discourse in Washington.

"Palin's invocation of a 'blood libel' charge against her perceived enemies is hardly a step in the right direction," Harris said.




FOCUS OF CRITICISM

Palin has been a focus of criticism from the left since the shootings for urging followers to "reload," not retreat, after the healthcare debate and publishing an electoral map identifying vulnerable Democratic congressional districts, including Giffords,' with rifle cross-hairs.


The 2008 vice presidential candidate, a favorite of Tea Party conservatives but a lightning rod for liberal critics, has hinted at a presidential run but polls show her trailing many possible Republican rivals and President Barack Obama.



Seated before a fireplace and an American flag, Palin said in the video it was reprehensible for critics to say political rhetoric was to blame for the shootings.

"They claim political debate has somehow gotten more heated just recently. But when was it less heated?
Back in those 'calm days' when political figures literally settled their differences with dueling pistols?" she asked.

Blame for the shooting should not rest "with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle," she said.

Palin had been silent on the shooting for days since posting a message of sympathy for the victims on her Facebook page, even as other Republican presidential contenders spoke out about them.

Former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty was the only potential Republican contender to distance himself from Palin, although subtly.

He told The New York Times the crosshairs map was "not a device I would have used."



Palin's comments came on the day Obama headed to Arizona to attend a memorial service for the dead, who included a federal judge, a 9-year-old girl and one of Giffords' young aides. Her colleagues in Congress put most of their work on hold and held a bipartisan prayer service.



Palin was not the only conservative voice to defend campaign rhetoric from the right.

Losing Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle, a Tea Party favorite, condemned criticism of her call during the campaign for "Second Amendment remedies" -- a reference to the constitutional amendment on the right to bear arms.

"Inappropriately attributing blame of a singular tragedy to achieve a political agenda is contrary to civil discourse, and is a media ploy to which I refuse to belong," Angle said in a statement.



Sad.

 

Don't you love the left for calling Palin stupid but now she is so smart she is using "code words" that the left loves to interpret?

Yet direct derogatory words by the left about Jews are proof that they love them. Go figure.

 

"Blood Libel" is hardly a code word.



The term, while not widely used in America, has particular resonance with Jews, many of whom find it deeply offensive.

The allegations behind blood libel originate in the Middle Ages when Jews were falsely accused of ritualised murder, in particular the murder of children. The allegations were used to justify violence against Jews.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12176503

 

That's how Palin wants you to think ... can she have her hook, line & sinker back now ?

 

Yeah, and Palin is so smart that she knew that when almost no one else did. LOL You guys are precious.

 

Are you saying that you never heard of Blood Libel before?

And NO, Sarah Palin is NOT smart.. and her use of the term was to paint herself as falsely accused.. a victim... "like the European Jews".

 

I never knew what blood libel stood for, so since you seem to think Palin is dumb, what makes you think she knew?

When I saw the article you showed as some kind of "code", I see typical whining from the left, looking for problems. For as many accusations the left had for Palin, none of them ever stuck so that should be a clue for you.

 

Do you know what a Domioninist is or what the means to conservative and largely uneducated Christians?

 

*facepalm*

 

I have been following politics a long time...and Palin's remark was the first time I had EVER heard the phrase "blood libel".

 

anti-Semantic???

Carter speaks very well.

Fundamentalist Christians, Dominionists and Christian Zionists think that all Jews must return to Israel.. and 2/3rds of them must die before Jesus can return..

Its bad theology and developed among the rural and uneducated poor during the 1930s.

 

You're kidding?

It always shows up when Zionists or Israelis get exercised.. They talk about Blood Libel, Protocols of Elders of Zion and all that tommy rot.

Its all BS.. about Jews killing Christian babies, blah, blah , blah.

 

It will most likely occur during chaos and civil war, and with the emergence of the 12th Imam. It is quite amazing how crazed religious notions from two belief systems that are often pitted against each another are quite similar.

 

Oh yeah.

The Jews are, and have been, brought up to fear the Christians because their people lived in Europe under the Universal Christianity that did some bad stuff to them.
This did not go away.

They feel safer with the liberal atheistic sexually promiscuous pagans who, as you say, were the substance of culture that ushered in the Nazi regime.

Jews need to be educated in the history of 1933 and see the correspondences with what the Leftist liberal democratic machine is doing.
They need remember that Hitler was a villent pro-union leader who grasped the reigns of power in a social climate of sexual promiscuity and over borrowing by the Government.