CNN's Joe Lockhart attacks Sandmann as 'snot nose entitled kid' after network's defamation suit

You mean the guy that disgraced his heritage by lying about his military service claiming to be a Vietnam Vet Marine Recon Ranger? Yeah, real stand up guy.


Phillips continued, his voice breaking. “You know, I’m from Vietnam times. I’m what they call a recon ranger. That was my role. So I thank you for taking that point position for me.”
https://www.vogue.com/projects/13542941/return-to-standing-rock/

"The Native American tribal elder who became the focus of a viral social media controversy over the weekend is not a Vietnam veteran, the U.S. Marine Corps confirmed Wednesday.
Nathan Phillips, 64, spent four years in the Marine Corps Reserve and left in 1976 with the rank of private, or E-1, the Marines said in a statement providing his personal releasable information."
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...-not-a-vietnam-veteran-military-records-show/

How does a guy spend 4 years in the service and get out as an E-1? He's a dirt bag. Not only is he a dirt bag, he's a lying dirt bag.

 

NO PROOF of that (whatsoever).

Regardless of what Sandy got, rubbing CNN's nose in their own sh*t is PRICELESS.

So is making Joe Lockhart cry...



Losers Gonna Lose...

 

By the same token, no one has any idea what he actually got.

Thus, any sort of default assumption like "he got millions" is supremely misguided.

That said, I may change my mind when I see Nick and his new girlfriend (Margot Robbie) driving around in Twin Lamborghinis.

I might change my tune then.

 

Sandmann is just another thing that triggers the lefties. It just galls them to know he is winning his suits.
I would have loved to watch the expressions of the CNN crew when at the end of his speech,

 

LOL - By being a Marine Corps "recon ranger".

 

He's giving credit where credit is due. That's what adults do.

 

The same expression every TDS Sufferer gets when a Trumpeteer puts on a MAGA hat...

 

Any reporting on how much CNN settled for? I doubt it was much. Certainly not the millions the kid’s family was after.

 

Gonna sue CNN again for definition of character?

 

I’m not offended in the slightest.
I just doubt that the kid’s family has a compelling argument for much in the way of monetary damages. I’d be surprised if he cleared more than 100k after all cases are settled.

 

Sour grapes whiney little brats that didn't get their way! CNN is the absolute worst of them!!

And I bet that settlement was at least in the 6 figures if not 7 or 8 figures! Crush the libs with their own constant failures! Oh wait, they seem to crush themselves!

I wonder if they will all be crying on air when Trump gets re-elected?

 

Actually the lady won the suit against McDonald's because the coffee was served at a much higher temperature then it was supposed to be. And if I remember right they didn't even give her a coffee holder with it so it was to hot for her to hold when she grabbed it which resulted in her dropping it.

And you're free to provide a clip of what exactly Sandman did wrong. Did he do something other then smile and not back down or is that what you're crying about?

 

Why??? Anybody watching the full video could see this kid did no provocation...even the liberals who did a lot of backtracking.

 

LOL, you should throw on a MAGA hate and go be obnoxious. Maybe you’ll be the next to win the sue happy lottery.

 

Sandmann is a Trump supporter, something Mandelus can't stand. He is all tied up in criticizing American politics for some reason.

 

You first!

 

Lordy! Looks like even my low ball was likely overplaying this kid’s settlement.

“”“If you believe this kid got anything more than a nuisance fee settlement, you’re dreaming,” said national security law attorney Bradley P. Moss.”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/lawand...ed-away-from-media-lawsuits-with-peanuts/amp/

 

Nah, I’m not one to degrade myself to make a quick buck.

 

Do adults also grab Women by the ***** and give other adults childish nicknames?

Do you do any of the 2 I mentioned above?

 

You sound certain. Perhaps you have your own citation that underpins your certainly. I mean, certainly you have something that corroborates your assertion... right? no?

 

He's gonna pour himself a bucket of Leftist tears.

Hope he's thirsty...

 

Was Bradley a part of the team that defended CNN? And if he was, didn't he just break his confidentiality clause by saying the above? Oh wait... He wasn't actually on the case, and he has literally no idea. And since this isn't his area of expertise, why is he credible in your mind?

 

From the same article:

““Those with zero legal experience (as far as I can tell) should not be conjecturing on lawsuits they know nothing about,” said attorney Mark Zaid. “What kind of journalism is that?”

“I’ve litigated defamation cases. Sandman was undoubtedly paid nuisance value settlement & nothing more,” he added.“

People with actual legal expertise seem to think the kid got jack and squat. I’ll take their informed opinions offer the gleeful hyperventilating I’m seeing in this thread.

 

Ummm.....how do you think men become fathers, Walter?

At least Trump ain't grabbin' little girls...



What did Michelle Obama call Paleo Joe - a "profoundly decent man"?

MO got jokes...

 

Had to come back and say this gave me a chuckle.