Comer to invite Joe Biden to testify before Oversight Committee

Oh I just don't play the games.... "When did you stop beating your wife?"

 

.

 

Sorry but you absolutely can prove whether something is true or not

 

Comer does not have any particular star witness and never had one...


Bobulinski confirms what we all know. Nancy Mace: "Is Joe Biden lying when he says he did not interact with Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, their business partners or foreign interests?" Bobulinski: "Yes."

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1770546171947483427

 

In fact, he's had several "star" witnesses...
Alexander Smirnov...under arrest
"Mr. Bobulinski did not offer any evidence of wrongdoing by President Biden," Raskin said in his letter. "He also did not provide any evidence that President Biden was involved in his family's business dealings."
Jason Galanis who confirmed Joe biden was nothing but a voice on a cell phone.

Comer bragged about his witnesses then he sh*t the floor when they actually told the truth.

 

It is a lie.... not the truth... neither claim describes what a “weaponization” committee and the Republican impeachment committees were illegal unconstitutional committees really is... but we have a prime example with the Pelosi Committee... A committee that does not comply with it's own rules by a handpicked panel by Pelosi that all have already voted to impeach Trump... only a 9 member panel that should be 13... not by McCarthy choice, but by Pelosi's rule.

Let Alan explain why the J6 committee was unconstitutional...

Alan Dershowitz on Jan. 6 Committee's Trump criminal referral: This is unconstitutional

It violates 3 provisions of the constitution...

https://rumble.com/v21kvsw-alan-der...s-trump-criminal-referral-this-is-uncons.html

 

Alexander Smirnov was the FBI's witness... not Comer's.

Bobulinski and Galanis are what is called a first hand witness... propbably a strange terminology for the left after we had an impeachment hearing with only second and third hand hearsay witnesses... oh what, there was one first hand , Sondland, and he was only "presuming" quid pro quo...

 

So the FBI is in charge of the Oversight Committee?
The FBI forced Comer to use Smirnov?

" Bobulinski and Galanis are what is called a first hand witness..."
Who provided exactly zero evidence.

Keep dancing. Maybe someone will change the record for you.

 

The FBI lied to Congress... illegally lying to Congress and no one was held accountable... Smirnov is only one of many witnesses in their impeachment inquiry... Smirnov was never Comer's only link to the Biden family shady deals... there are pages and pages of bank records, emails, money laundering through the shell companies, pictures and testimony Comer has uncovered as evidence (in impeachment speak) or in "reasonable suspicion" which is the low bar for DOJ investigations...

Where are the DOJ investigations? What did Daddy Joe know and when did he know it?

Humor us.............
show us a link or copy of the 2023 declassified FD-1023 testimony of Smirnov... no one has produced that yet... that is what they indicted him on... after they lied to Congress...

 

I'm guessing you should expand your information sources...

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...-informants-biden-claims-not-be-corroborated/

 

Everyone who has passed intro to logic has proven a negative. Negatives are proven all of the time.

 

Keep spinning... ain't playing this game..

 

Holy ****, that's a cool pic!

 

Galanis and Bobulinski provided first hand evidence as witnesses.. Testimony is a kind of evidence, and it is often the only evidence that a judge has when deciding a case. So combining the many pages of documents evidence (in impeachment inquiry speak ) and the "reasonable suspicion" for the start of the DOJ investigations.. along with the testimonies... adds up to more than enough to implicate Joe Biden..

What did Joe know and when did he know it... The DOJ has had this for years, where is their investigation?

I ask AGAIN..
Humor us.............
show us a link or copy of the 2023 declassified FD-1023 testimony of Smirnov... no one has produced that yet... that is what they indicted him on... after they lied to Congress...

 

You're confusing Comer with Pot Hole Pete or Kamala Harris.

 

Interesting Tony Bobulinski’s interview...

Q. So anyone, any politician or any elected official who goes out and peddles that Joe Biden’s not involved with Hunter Biden’s business, they’re peddling false information, correct?

A. They’re lying. It’s a blatant lie. You have stacks of evidence that Joe Biden showed up at meetings, shook hands, participated in phone calls, all the way back to last summer.

Imagine Devon Archer going in front of the world, facing jail time, a Democrat lifetimer, whatever ‑‑ I don’t know his political affiliation, but, you know, he was business partners with, you know, the Bidens for years ‑‑ comes out and tells the world that Joe Biden was on 20‑plus phone calls?

But what was he calling for? Why? He was calling to demonstrate the Biden brand to whoever was in that meeting, whether it was the Ukrainians, the Romanians, the Russians, Colombians, Chinese, whoever it was. That’s all he had to do. He didn’t have to say, “Well, hey, what about that deal? Where are we getting the money to fund that?” Just him being on the phone is evidence of involvement and enabling the transaction. And any statement otherwise is an absurd statement.


https://oversight.house.gov/blog/key-excerpts-from-tony-bobulinskis-transcribed-interview/

 

If Bobulinski is lying then democrats will make a criminal referral to Garland for lying to congress, right?

 

I’m thinking Comer should subpoena Biden’s grandkids and ask them what products and services they sold n order to get Chinese money.

 

All he has to do to shut them up is tell them what goods and services his family provided in exchange for millions of dollars from foreign Nations.

Unless of course he doesn't have a legitimate reason to have been receiving such monies

 

Gee FB, you broke this down so simply that I’m sure even libs and Biden can understand it. Let’s see what their response is.

 

Give it up bro (ETTD), flogging a dead horse won't make it run. It's already dead, dead as a door nail. Shoot it just for good measure if it helps you to realize this cause gas lite itself into oblivion.

 

Comer and Gym along with all the other House GOP know they don't have ****. If they did, they would call a vote to impeach. This is all political theater for their mindless mango base.

Again, if I were Hunter, I'd tell them to go **** themselves with their invitation, they don't have the sack to hold an impeachment vote, let alone the votes as well.

 

Trump showed no President EVER has to do that again, so it will never happen, left or right

 

And that evidence amounted to...

 

None whatsoever.
I'm just applying @popscott 's standard. What's good for one side is good for the other , no ?

Again, what possible purpose would be served by Biden testifying ? Other than to let partisan Republicans on a political hit job to try and take free shots at their opposition. Why don't they call Trump to testify ? Clear up all that Insurrection talk and get some testimony on record. Maybe the DC case will go away if he
can explain it.