Confronting the Gun Carnage in the US

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Natty Bumpo, Sep 6, 2019.

  1. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,498
    Likes Received:
    14,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To be clear, I do not share your opinion that anyone should be able to sell or give an arsenal of AR-15s to a known felon, convicted of multiple shootings and, after serving his incarceration, is still making death threats against the public.
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2019
  2. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,498
    Likes Received:
    14,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can dismiss a child killing himself with his father's gun if you want to.

    I am talking about firearm fatalities, and it is one example of an inordinately high number that occur in the US.
     
  3. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,284
    Likes Received:
    11,148
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why make stuff up? I have never said anything resembling that.

    Again. State in simple terms how you lower run death rates. Universal background checks won't do it. Elimination of AR-15s and the NRA won't do it.
     
  4. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,498
    Likes Received:
    14,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
  5. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,284
    Likes Received:
    11,148
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Natty Bumpo. Was there supposed to be an answer there?
     
  6. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,498
    Likes Received:
    14,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps I was confused by your repeated refusal to answer the question. I'll try once more:

    "If you oppose universal background checks, do you think that it should it be perfectly legit for anyone to sell or give an arsenal of AR-15s to a known felon, convicted of multiple shootings and after serving his incarceration, but still making death threats against the public?
    You have expressed your opinion that universal background checks, supported by the vast majority of Americans, are futile. We shall know whether you are correct, of course, after they have been legislated.

    I think that this is illustrative of why so many mayors, police chiefs, and others concerned for public safety - including the American public - are supportive of such background checks being mandatory and universal:
    Also, you seemed eager to dismiss the vast difference in firearm fatalities in some states compared to others. You may want to take a look at how state laws and firearm-per-capita rates in the states with the highest firearm fatality rates differ so widely from those with the lowest.

    The difference is quite striking:

    1. Alaska - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 23.0 per 100,000
    2. Alabama - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 21.4 per 100,000

    3. Louisiana - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 21.2 per 100,000

    4. Mississippi - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 19.8 per 100,000

    5. Oklahoma - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 19.6 per 100,000

    6. Montana - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 19.0 per 100,000

    7. Missouri - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 18.8 per 100,000

    8. New Mexico - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 18.2 per 100,000

    9. Arkansas - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 17.7 per 100,000

    10. South Carolina - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 17.7 per 100,000


    ... and the states with the least:


    50. Massachusetts - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 3.4 per 100,000

    49. Rhode Island - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 4.0 per 100,000

    48. New York - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 4.4 per 100,000

    47. Hawaii - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 4.5 per 100,000

    46. Connecticut - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 4.6 per 100,000

    45. New Jersey - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 5.5 per 100,000

    44. Minnesota - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 7.6 per 100,000

    43. California - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 7.9 per 100,000

    42. Maine - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 8.2 per 100,000

    41. Washington - Firearm deaths per 100,000 people: 9.0 per 100,000

    https://247wallst.com/special-report/2018/02/20/states-with-the-most-gun-violence-2/
    Objectively assessing empirical data is preferable to expressing an ideological bias.

     
  7. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,284
    Likes Received:
    11,148
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is a rather stupid remark. I oppose universal background checks for the simple reason that they will be impossible to accomplish effectively. You have failed to show where I am wrong.
    Because buried within those statistics, there are further statistics that deaths per state brush over.

    Within most, if not all, of those low gun death states as well as the high gun death states, there are extremely high gun death areas. You can google about any city and they will be identified. The high gun death rates are not spread evenly across states. They tend to be localized. Some areas in the low gun death states are dangerous and some areas in the high gun death states are safe. The state itself means virtually nothing.
     
  8. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,498
    Likes Received:
    14,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your belief would result in it being perfectly legit for anyone to sell or give an arsenal of AR-15s to a known felon, convicted of multiple shootings and after serving his incarceration, but still making death threats against the public.

    The vast majority of Americans do not share your belief that such a sale or gift should be legal.


    The striking disparities between state firearm laws and stark differences in their firearm fatality rates should be objectively assessed, not summarily dismissed by those with ideological biases.
     
  9. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,284
    Likes Received:
    11,148
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The vast majority of Americans do not understand the ramifications. And you still have not shown me where I am wrong.
    Objectively evaluated means the underlying causes should be investigated and that means more than just lumping a state as if the state is homogeneous.
     
  10. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gun carnage is a bunch of baloney. Lefties want power without resistance. Sorry lefties, not happening.
     
    Josh77 likes this.
  11. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The question is whether or not government is the answer. Society produces lunatics that shoot folks and now a bloated organization is supposed to step in and correct it? Not gonna happen.
     
    Josh77 likes this.
  12. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CDC Causes of Death 2014

    Heart Disease

    Number of deaths: 614,348
    Deaths per 100,000 population: 192.7
    Cause of death rank: 1

    Cigarette smoking

    Cigarette smoking is responsible for more than 480,000 deaths per year in the United States, including more than 41,000 deaths resulting from secondhand smoke exposure. This is about one in five deaths annually, or 1,300 deaths every day.*

    All injury deaths

    Number of deaths: 199,752
    Deaths per 100,000 population: 62.6

    All poisoning deaths

    Number of deaths: 51,966
    Deaths per 100,000 population: 16.3

    Death rates for drug poisoning and drug poisoning involving opioid analgesics and heroin**

    Number of deaths: 50,000 (approx)
    Deaths per 100,000 population: 16.3


    Motor vehicle traffic deaths

    Number of deaths: 33,736
    Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.6

    Alcohol Use

    Number of alcoholic liver disease deaths: 19,388
    Number of alcohol-induced deaths, excluding accidents and homicides: 30,722

    Firearm homicides

    Number of deaths: 11,008
    Deaths per 100,000 population: 3.5

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/default.htm
    *https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/index.htm
    **https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2016/027.pdf
     
  13. Belch

    Belch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2015
    Messages:
    16,275
    Likes Received:
    4,479
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why the focus upon firearms fatalities? You know that this number includes all sorts of things like suicides and people using guns to protect themselves.

    You know that conservatives like myself look at this clumping everybody who died because of a gun into the same basket isn't going to ruffle any skirts, so...

    Why continue conflating all of these firearm deaths together, and refusing to include all of those deaths that aren't firearms related?

    Personally, I think you're just lying because you don't like people having guns, so you conflate everything you can, and leave everything out that you can because... well, lefty.
     
  14. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,498
    Likes Received:
    14,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why are so many Americans determined to address the firearm carnage from suicides, homicides, and accidental shootings that far exceed the rate of all other advanced nations? Because they believe that many of those deaths are preventable and want to prevent them. (I have no figures concerning fatalities resulting from "people using guns to protect themselves," but would be happy to see any empirical data that you can cite.)

    If your impotence in confronting the majority of Americans hoping to reduce the inordinate level of firearm carnage in America makes you lash out with such ad hominem attacks, that is what you will do.

    Most Americans, including gun owners, support sensible legislation to reduce the firearm carnage.

    Some gun-dependent nervous nellies have been infected with a paranoidal delusion of a Big Blue Meanie taking all their shooties away, but it's not a rational fear. Otherwise, you would not see so many gun owners supporting sensible legislation.

    Screen Shot 2019-09-15 at 7.45.00 AM.png Screen Shot 2019-09-15 at 7.43.42 AM.png

     
  15. Adfundum

    Adfundum Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,698
    Likes Received:
    4,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Pessimist...
    You just aren't trying hard enough.
     
  16. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,618
    Likes Received:
    7,699
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which has nothing to do with firearm crime
     
  17. Josh77

    Josh77 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    10,337
    Likes Received:
    7,022
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It looks to me like you just hate fat people, judging from the photo.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2019
  18. Robert E Allen

    Robert E Allen Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,041
    Likes Received:
    5,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Maybe we should teach kids. Not to steal, lie kill or cheat,
    Oh wait, we used to but it was deemed a violation of church and state
     

Share This Page