Conservatives Upset ‘The Good Fight’ Wants You To Punch Nazis

This is just more bizarre deflecting btw.

You are more concerned with insulting me and my "wit", and calling me out for being "disingenuous"?

I've never seen such lack of "wit" or disingenuousness. Well I have, but it never ceases to amaze.

 

I'm referring to your suggestion that if people don't like the fallout from holding a particular philosophical position, they should just stop holding that philosophical position. YOUR SUGGESTION, not mine.

 

They do exist. Like I said, there are about 16 of them.

 

Do you think all Nazis kill Jews?

Do you 'hate' all Nazis?

 

Wow, being extremely sensitive are you?
Are you worried if one punches a nazi?

Do you remember at a tRUMP rally where tRUMP specifically told people in the crowd to punch someone? And he'd pay their expenses for doing so?

And do you know how fragile tRUMPers are? They get incited real easy. It's why RW terrorism is tops in the USA. tRUMP gives the nutters a platform.

 

Oh, for crying out loud. Stop the horseshit.

Nobody is being mistaken for a Nazi. They are being intentionally and willfully slandered.

 

Well. If we ignore the fact that it was a direct response to something in your post, and if we ignore the fact that colleges are punch a Nazi central (just the kind of place that such hateful messages are aimed at), if we're willing to ignore that it is on point and on topic, then we might lie and call it a deflection.

 

Dodge.

 

No one should be hitting anyone, period!!!

 

Here’s a thought. Suppose it was the Nazi’s mother, or sister, or wife, or lover that heard him speaking such vile? Wouldn’t it be appropriate for those good people who love him to smack him one upside the head? Just to remind him that Nazism is pain? I’d give them a pass—you know, sometimes a good smack upside the head can get ya thinking. Kinda like a kick in the pants.

 

The Berkeley incident wasn't because Yiannopoulos was labeled a Nazi. The college Republican party chose Milo to speak knowing fully well how incendiary his comments were. Even countries including our ally, Australia have banned the Republican from speaking.

 

You know ... there was a time when being a Milo (controversial, 'incendiary', rebellious, outrageous, irreverent, etc) was applauded by young Leftists. Imagine that!

 

It's sad that people are so determined to live lies that truth must be labeled 'incindiary' and rioted against.

 

Republicans, the alt-right, NATSOC... it's all the same in the progressive mind. And anyways, there's simply no excuse or justification for what happened at Berkeley.

 

It was ever thus. The difference being that it was always Conservatives who engaged in resistance to rebellion and challenge. The Left were the ones shouting 'anything goes .. tolerance is all!'. We used to call Conservatives a pack of old fuddy duddies, starched shirts, squares, etc because they couldn't cope with challenges to their dogma. We insisted that rebellion and controversy were the way forward, the way to break down expired stereotypes and systems. We were the ones who insisted that all rebellion was potentially important, because we were philosophical atheists. It was Conservatives who insisted on a single iteration, all others being 'of the devil'. They were the ones who treated politics like religion, not us.

Hard to believe it was only 20 years ago

 

There's no excuse for the violence and damage. I'm sure the police arrested rioters. Universities, knowing the cost for security have asked college Republicans to cover the expense if they select individuals like Milo. I was incorrect to assume that Yiannopoulos was not a Nazi.

"Yiannopoulos had repeatedly solicited neo-Nazi and white supremacist figures on the alt-right for feedback and story ideas in his work for the website Breitbart."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milo_Yiannopoulos

 

Er... Wikipedia forms your opinions?

 

OMG. Are you aware that he is Jewish? He's also married to a black man.

The desperation to cling to old tropes is hilarious, and revolting.

 

Read and weep that your hero is a Nazi sympathizer:

"Association with Neo-Nazism and the alt-right

Much of the work at Breitbart which brought Yiannopoulos to national attention was inspired by the ideas of neo-Nazis and white nationalists. In October 2017, leaked emails revealed that Yiannopoulos had repeatedly solicited neo-Nazi and white supremacist figures on the alt-right for feedback and story ideas in his work for the website Breitbart. The leaked emails also showed that his book, Dangerous, and many of his Breitbart articles were ghost-written by a Breitbart colleague.[45]

Yiannopoulos is commonly associated with the alt-right. In a November 2016 interview with Channel 4, Yiannopoulos talked about his relationship with the movement – "We're fellow travellers on some issues. But I'm very pro-Iraq, I'm very pro-Israel. There are all sorts of points of difference, I think."[46]

In a Breitbart article, Yiannopoulos and a co-author described the alt-right movement as "dangerously bright". The Tablet stated that many of these intellectual backers write for publications it describes as racist and antisemitic, such as VDARE and American Renaissance. The Breitbart article was criticised by opponents of the alt-right for excusing the extremist elements of the movement, and also by the neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer which holds that racism and antisemitism are pillars of the alt-right.[47]

The Anti-Defamation League classifies Yiannopoulos as part of the alt-lite; a term used to distinguish individuals sometimes associated with the alt-right from those who are openly white nationalist and anti-semitic.[48]These accusations, as well as Yiannopoulos's support for Trump, have contributed to a feud between Yiannopoulos and Ben Shapiro, a Jewish conservative political commentator who refused to support Trump in the 2016 election. Shapiro accused Yiannopoulos, his followers, and other Trump supporters of racist and anti-Semitic behaviour. He criticized Yiannopoulos's attempts to distinguish between real racist or bigoted behaviour and trolling, stating that "words have meaning" and that the distinction that Yiannopoulos was attempting to make "simply doesn’t exist in objective reality".[49]

In October 2016, during an interview with BBC, Yiannopoulos argued that the alt-right was primarily concerned with "immigration, trade and political correctness and free speech generally". He suggested that the alt-right takes a number of different forms, from "classical-liberals, disaffected leftists, ordinary conservatives, and this new young very energised, trolly, mischievous youthful contingent that has suddenly become interested in politics again, and that's the wing that I am most closely associated with, because that's the most exciting bit". He described this contingent of the alt-right as "sort of unstoppable at the moment" and "the bit of the movement that will win".[50]"

 

But that proves nothing!!!

 

A lot of words that really don't say much.

Hell, even Joe Rogan is in danger of being designated as a nazi.

 

Hey Stephen Miller is also Jewish but as extreme as Milo.

 

Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Gad Saad... all Jewish Nazis!

 

Of course. He's bound to secretly harbour a hatred of Jews and a love of the Aryan archetype. This Greek Jew/black loving thing is all a ruse to hide his Nazism. I married a black man for the same reason. To hide my KKKy-ness. I even made three black babies for extra protection from detection!

 

Facetious?