Court turns away lawsuit over Obama eligibility

And Congress did- just as it did for Bush, Clinton, Reagan, etc. Congress without a single objection confirmed Obama's election.

"Congress failed to do its job and there is no excuse. When McCain's citizenship was in question, Congress promptly looked into it and verified he was a natural born citizen even though he was born in the Panama Canal Zone."

No, Congress did no investigation. They passed a non-binding resolution stating their opinion because there were legitimate doubts about whether a person borne outside the United States could be a Natural born citizen. In Obama's case- Congress voted without a single objection to confirm him as a natural born citizen.

So every single Congressman and Congresswoman was corrupted?
The Supreme Court?
The State of Hawaii?
80 some judges.
The Electoral College?

And lets not forget almost 70 million voters.

The Conspiracy theory runs strong with you....

 

Not that its relevant, but of course thats not true.

 

LOL... Let me guess... Where you went to law school, Orly Taitz was the Dean?

LOL... With regard to voting for him, that's a political issue. I didn't vote for him.

With regard to his Constitutional eligibility to hold the office, only an idiot could think that a person could rise to the level of President of the United States, the most scrutinized and examined position on the face of the Earth, while hiding their birth origins. And only a clinically insane idiot could still think that after the State of Hawaii certified on numerous occasions as the official keeper of Obama's birth records that Obama was absolutely, positively, born in Hawaii.

What job would you suggest they should have done? Please state specific actions they should have taken.

Also, please show any actions they took for any prior President-elect, and explain why you think those were sufficient, or explain why no actions were needed with any prior President if none were taken.

 

Another judge takes a bribe. America is as corrupt as mexico.

 

Having dealt with you before, I know there's no actual hope of you proving this, but, do you have any proof whatsoever of any Supreme Court Justice taking a bribe with respect to this case?

It's pretty asinine to accuse people of criminal activity without proof.

 

There is little doubt that that is part of the reason. And it is a very, very good reason.

Well, you are confabulating two completely different ideas here, but that is actually neither here nor there. Congress is constitutionally assigned the role of acting on the eligibility of a President-elect, but not the role of determining that eligibility. No one is assigned the role... for very good historical reasons. How (in 1787) would it even have been possible to do so?

The anachronistic fascination by Birthers with birth certificates is a bit droll, given that of our 43 different presidents, at least 35 did not have one. So, how would a "vetting process" have conceivably been managed in 1790? Or 1890? The same way it is managed now... by an election.

The entire purpose of competitive elections is to allow the examination of the candidates in detail, and especially to expose them to the attention of contest. If there was any genuine evidence that a candidate was ineligible, then tit would have been revealed during the campaign. These are not secrets that can be kept. And this is the key point to which Birthers remain oblivious:

There is no evidence that Obama is ineligible.

Even after three plus years, Birthism has never risen above the level of flaccid Internet rumor.

And this is a perfect example of the system working perfectly. McCain was not born on US soil. There is no way that could have been kept secret. And so it was addressed.

But not, by the way, by Congress "looking into it." There were never any hearings. There was no investigation. No documentation was requested and none was proffered. The Senate merely passed a non-binding resolution.

Sometimes you lose because there is corruption. Other times, you lose because you are wrong.

In this case, you are simply wrong.

 

Except of course his wife and children, and every relative in the Dunham side of the family. To include Dick Cheney.

 

You have no idea how the Supreme Court works, do you?

Hint #1: There's not just one of them.